G-CIVP
Topic Author
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 6:38 am

In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 11:18 am

Further to the previous question regarding picture styles for a Canon body, we have a follow up question.

Should a photographer ever adjust in camera sharpness (in picture styles) or set it to zero and adjust in post photo processing? I'm aware that if shooting RAW this is immaterial but for jpeg users this will be different.

I'm just interested to see what photographers' opinions are and whether there is a consensus.
 
User avatar
yerbol
Crew
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:18 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 12:26 pm

I always keep my in-camera sharpness on default settings and do all post processing with sharpness afterwards.
With best regards from Almaty
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 1:18 pm

Turn it off.
Why? Because it will sharpen things that should not be sharpened, such as the sky.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 1:48 pm

Quoting G-CIVP (Thread starter):
Should a photographer ever adjust in camera sharpness (in picture styles) or set it to zero and adjust in post photo processing?

I always keep it to the default setting. In my opinion, sharpening is better done in post rather than letting the camera do it. You can't reduce it once the camera has applied sharpening but you can sharpen as much or as little as you want in post, and most importantly, selectively.

Quoting viv (Reply 2):
Why? Because it will sharpen things that should not be sharpened, such as the sky.

I couldn't agree more.

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
RCoulter
Posts: 456
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:02 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 2:58 pm

I shoot RAW so I actually have mine set at the highest setting, I find it helps me weed out photos on the camera easier by showing blur better on the cameras LCD.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11766
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 5:52 pm

On my Rebel XS, I left it at default (3). On my 50D, I have it set at 4.

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 3):
I always keep it to the default setting.
Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 3):
Quoting viv (Reply 2):
Why? Because it will sharpen things that should not be sharpened, such as the sky.

I couldn't agree more.

But the default setting on the cameras I've used isn't zero....

I don't find the slight sharpening it may apply to the sky to be an issue, ever. I actually find the reduced sharpening I have to give it after resizing is more of a benefit.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 6:32 pm

Quoting RCoulter (Reply 4):

I shoot RAW so I actually have mine set at the highest setting, I find it helps me weed out photos on the camera easier by showing blur better on the cameras LCD.


     THIS! For LCD viewing purposes, I crank in camera sharpening all the way up. Since I open photos in ACR, all in camera parameters don't apply anyway since ACR has it's own defaults, giving me a clean slate.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
G-CIVP
Topic Author
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 6:38 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:30 pm

Interesting discussion. One emerging issue is the definition of 'default'. As vikkyvik notes, the default setting on Canon cameras isn't necessarily '0' (zero) but set at '3' for standard picture style on a 60D, which has preciptated the question. So as Dazbo5 suggests, should this be dialled down to '0'?

For anyone wishes to contribute further I would be interested to read your thoughts, then I will share my conclusions.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11766
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:35 pm

Quoting G-CIVP (Reply 7):
So as Dazbo5 suggests, should this be dialled down to '0'?

There's really no "this should" or "this shouldn't". It's whatever works for you. I found I had to dial up sharpness a bit when I got the 50D, so I did. Works for me.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Sun Jul 21, 2013 11:05 pm

Yes, the default sharpening is not 0 - partly, I suspect, to avoid people being put off by soft images on the LCD (and haven't read the manual).

I think there is some debate as to whether or not it is possible to turn sharpening completely off (ie. many claim even if set at 0, a small amount of sharpening occurs). Again this may be camera specific and possibly related to the strength of the anit-aliasing filter (which varies between models).

In general I'd advocate using the weakest setting on the principle that sharpening can be added, not removed. However, if the object is to avoid post-processing, then the default setting is probably better. With zooms which may be soft at the long end, increasing the strength may be worthwhile.

If post processing is not an issue, then I would ask why not shoot RAW?

Cheers,

Colin
Colin K. Work, Pixstel
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:09 am

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 8):
There's really no "this should" or "this shouldn't". It's whatever works for you.

That's the real key, it's whatever works for you. I'm sure everyone here does things slightly different, but it's the end results that really matters. That's where experience comes in, play around with the settings and use what works best for your personal needs.

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
sulman
Posts: 1963
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:09 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:44 pm

Funnily enough, a lot of newer workflow and 'digital asset management' (bleurgh) software is doing essentially the same thing these days; even ACR tries to sneak in a little sharpening; one has to remember to switch it off.

Canon DPP is interesting for this as you can effectively experiment with those same presets and see exactly what they do.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:31 pm

Quoting sulman (Reply 11):
Canon DPP is interesting for this as you can effectively experiment with those same presets and see exactly what they do.

For Canon, your in camera setting when shooting RAW are only relevant to your post process if you're starting your edit using Canon's DPP because it handles the file exactly as it was shot in camera. Otherwise programs apply their own base settings to your files unless set up otherwise.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
coninpa
Crew
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 3:36 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Wed Jul 24, 2013 9:40 am

Quoting viv (Reply 2):
Turn it off.
Why? Because it will sharpen things that should not be sharpened, such as the sky.

Perfectly agree. In addition, if a wing or stabilizer is oversharpened in-camera, it's very hard to impossible to recover in post-processing.

As a personal taste, I shoot only in RAW and sharpen in post processing.
Patrick De Coninck
 
G-CIVP
Topic Author
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 6:38 am

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Fri Aug 02, 2013 2:02 pm

Just a short note to thank everyone for their contributions. The main conclusion is to turn off in camera sharpening and shoot in RAW if you don't mind post photo processing. The other issue which hasn't been mentioned is the quality of lens which may have a bearing on whether the final image is sharp.
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:45 pm

Quoting G-CIVP (Reply 14):
The main conclusion is to turn off in camera sharpening and shoot in RAW

   Shooting in RAW is plenty reason to turn ON in camera sharpening because it can be altered or removed in post!

 
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11766
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: In Camera Sharpness

Fri Aug 02, 2013 4:08 pm

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 15):
Shooting in RAW is plenty reason to turn ON in camera sharpening because it can be altered or removed in post!

Or turn it off because it can be added in post.

    
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests