User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:39 am

I agree with Len's point. The red dye seems OS other parts look ok to me.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Aug 17, 2017 11:47 am

The tail flag edges are a bit sharp, but I wouldn't reject that for oversharpened. If anything, the front & titles seem a little soft.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:53 pm

thanks all, will fix it.
 
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:45 pm

The whole fuselage & tail could use an extra kick of sharpening. The reflection likely make it a bit softer than usual.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:21 pm

airkas1 wrote:
The whole fuselage & tail could use an extra kick of sharpening. The reflection likely make it a bit softer than usual.

Excellent, thanks a lot!
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:44 pm

Hello, this one was rejected for oversharpened. I have some difficulties seeing the jaggies. Please help me with this, thanks

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 166a7f9037
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:22 pm

Actually, i don't see obvious jaggies here.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
jelpee
Screener
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:56 pm

I don't see any over-sharpening. There is a slight yellow cast though which can be easily fixed.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Sep 23, 2017 6:23 pm

Thank you, it was accepted after the appeal.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:24 am

Hi there, this one was just rejected for too much contrast and soft. Regarding contrast I did nothing special while editing and perhaps it has more to do with the dark background. Do you agree on the rejection? And where should I sharpen more? Greetings Stefan

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... b7c1d9e6df
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:05 pm

I think the contrast indeed could be reduced a little bit. And for me, the nose part , cockpit, the surroundings around first door looks bit of soft to me i think, the tail AND the title also seem bit of but not bad. Besides, i think it also is bit of underexposed to me. It could be brighter i think.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:08 pm

Hi Stefan,

I agree with Harry that the shot looks a bit dark in total and too contrasty. I would lighten up the midtones on that one.
Otherwise it could Overall do with a pass of sharpening.

Julien
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:42 pm

The nose looks a bit marginal and I also agree that the darks are a bit dark. Sharpening is passable for me.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:57 am

Thanks all! Will re-edit and try again.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 22, 2017 8:19 am

This one was rejected for unbalanced crop. I wonder how I should crop better then? I can cut more off the right side but to me it doesn`t really matter. Please advice me, thanks

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d712460d84
 
User avatar
jelpee
Screener
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:44 pm

I would crop closer to the tail. As it is, it looks like the horizontal stabilizer was cropped prematurely. I would also crop closer to the nose thereby eliminating the winglet. A "nose to tail" crop usually looks balanced. I'm not too excited about the quality of the image though. At 1400 pixels, the sky looks noisy. I'd try it at 1024 pixels or 1200 pixels (max).

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:58 pm

Thanks Jehan, good feedback as always.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:54 pm

Hello there, this one was rejected for soft, blurry and too much contrast. The original is really sharp so I was a bit surspised it got a blurry rejection. Can someone help me out. And agreed on the hight contrast too? It was strange contrasty light en sky that day....Thanks Stefan

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f0157c514c
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 29, 2017 7:03 pm

I don't really see it as blurry/soft (that's most likely the light playing tricks on the eyes), but I do agree on 'contrast', although I'd call it dark instead of contrast. Especially towards the front.
 
len90
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:03 pm

It just looks like the nose fell out of the sunlight. Do you have another shot from the sequence?

Not sure if you can really brighten that up and salvage the nose without compromising the rest of the fuselage.
Len90
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:10 am

Kas en Len great stuff, thanks. Indeed the plane is with his head in the clouds so maybe better to leave it. I will try to brighten a bit and we`ll see. There`s no other shot of this one unfortunately. I have another question about a rejected shot

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4ed1db1557

I am trying to get it accepted but after a few HQ`s it is again rejected for underexposed. And now is high contrast added too. Any opinions if I really should brighten more? I don`t want it to look unnatural, there was not much sunlight at the time and it`s a nice shot so I don`t want it to leave it. Thanks
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:11 pm

Hi,
The contrast of it looks indeed bit of high could be reduced a little bit. Besides, the exposure i think also could be increased a little bit although it looks ok to me. Increasing a little bit woule be more confortable for me and i don't think it will lead to unnatural.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:01 pm

A quick edit seems to indicate that it can sustain at least +0.30 of brightness. This will likely also solve the contrast issue.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Dec 04, 2017 7:25 pm

Thanks Harry and Kas! I reedited and will try again.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:36 am

A new edit of the MD11 cargo was again rejected for underexposed. Think I still need to brighten more? I added some brightness I thought but probably not enough. Agree or should I appeal now?

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... bd9b91d603

Thanks a lot
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:06 pm

Uh.... to be honest , it the exposure looks not bad to me. But the noise seems more obvious than last time but also ok to me i think.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Dec 07, 2017 9:12 pm

Thanks Harry, it was just accepted after appeal. Greets!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos