Pre-screening ---Harry

HarryLi · Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:00 am

Hi every one ,
I uploaded some photos to A.net recently but some of them i am not sure if it can accept hope u guys can give some advice.

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

And finally is window view , also is my first time.

Thank u for all of your valuable time !

Cheers,
HarryLi

vikkyvik · Sat Jan 28, 2017 5:11 am

HarryLi wrote:
First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Overexposed, soft, high in frame.

HarryLi wrote:
Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

The overexposed outside really detracts from the photo in my opinion. I don't know how A.net will see it, as they sometimes allow that.

HarryLi wrote:
And finally is window view , also is my first time

Wing is overexposed. Looks OK to me otherwise.

HarryLi · Sat Jan 28, 2017 8:47 am

And here is another one.This one i am not sure about the sharpeness.

vikkyvik · Sat Jan 28, 2017 9:51 pm

HarryLi wrote:
And here is another one.This one i am not sure about the sharpeness.

A touch soft if anything, but OK for me. However, much of the fuse is blown out.

HarryLi · Sat Jan 28, 2017 9:55 pm

And here is the latest Special Livery of Hai nan Airlines.What do u think about this ?

airkas1 · Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:20 pm

CZ A380: looks passable.
Cockpit: outside OE and the center console & steering columns look a litte blurry.
Wingview: I think the exposure of the wing is passable, although the ground below could be a bit brighter maybe.
Malaysian: titles & tail look a little jaggy.
Hainan: looks ok.

HarryLi · Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:19 pm

airkas1 wrote:
CZ A380: looks passable.
Cockpit: outside OE and the center console & steering columns look a litte blurry.
Wingview: I think the exposure of the wing is passable, although the ground below could be a bit brighter maybe.
Malaysian: titles & tail look a little jaggy.
Hainan: looks ok.

Ok， thank you for your comment Kas. So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

HarryLi · Sun Jan 29, 2017 11:21 pm

vikkyvik wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Overexposed, soft, high in frame.

HarryLi wrote:
Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

The overexposed outside really detracts from the photo in my opinion. I don't know how A.net will see it, as they sometimes allow that.

HarryLi wrote:
And finally is window view , also is my first time

Wing is overexposed. Looks OK to me otherwise.

Thank you for your comment too Vik.

airkas1 · Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:01 am

HarryLi wrote:
So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

Correct.

HarryLi · Wed Feb 01, 2017 4:57 am

airkas1 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

Correct.

What about now ?

HarryLi · Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

HarryLi · Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:33 pm

HarryLi wrote:
Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

.0.0. Hi again. I want to have a try to upload a big size photo (1500*1000).And here is . This is my first time upload such a big photo to A.net.Hope you guys can give some opinions! Thank you very much.

HarryLi · Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:48 am

HarryLi wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

.0.0. Hi again. I want to have a try to upload a big size photo (1500*1000).And here is . This is my first time upload such a big photo to A.net.Hope you guys can give some opinions! Thank you very much.

Is it passable for screener?

airkas1 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:33 am

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

HarryLi · Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:02 am

airkas1 wrote:
The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

Ok, thanks.But ..i don't consider that the level problem is very serious.Can it be passable if i don't change it ?Because if i fix the level i think i should start the whole photo again.

HarryLi · Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:13 am

airkas1 wrote:
The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

AND the road of here is not 100% level so the pole mane not 100% vertical so maybe can not make a standard with the pole

HarryLi · Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:30 am

airkas1 wrote:
The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

I circled the title area and sharpened it again carefully.How's look now ?

HarryLi · Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:16 pm

Hi everyone ,
I got a Kuwait Air force C-130J this afternoon and it is very rare to see C-130 in Guangzhou also this is the Kuwait Air Force C130 first time come to Guangzhou.So i very hope this photo can be accepted by screener in other word your opinion also very important for me.I don't know if this can be passable ?

Cheers,
Junjie Li

HarryLi · Sun Feb 05, 2017 2:40 pm

HarryLi wrote:
Hi everyone ,
I got a Kuwait Air force C-130J this afternoon and it is very rare to see C-130 in Guangzhou also this is the Kuwait Air Force C130 first time come to Guangzhou.So i very hope this photo can be accepted by screener in other word your opinion also very important for me.I don't know if this can be passable ?

Cheers,
Junjie Li

Sorry guys i changed something in this photo and the following is the correct photo.

airkas1 · Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:59 pm

CZ A330: Could be a little sharpend ideally, but I probably wouldn't reject it for it as it currently us. However, in my opinion it still needs CCW.
C-130: Looks a little OS at the front & titles. Perhaps a little blurryish, but I'd say passable.

Small note in general; please don't quote full pictures. It clutters the thread, which makes it a little hard to get a good oversight.

HarryLi · Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:41 pm

airkas1 wrote:
CZ A330: Could be a little sharpend ideally, but I probably wouldn't reject it for it as it currently us. However, in my opinion it still needs CCW.
C-130: Looks a little OS at the front & titles. Perhaps a little blurryish, but I'd say passable.

Small note in general; please don't quote full pictures. It clutters the thread, which makes it a little hard to get a good oversight.

Ok I will not quote the whole pic next time. But I have to say i have check my original photo with 100% view I can not see any blurry.

HarryLi · Sat Feb 11, 2017 4:44 pm

Hi guys , i got a GEC MD-11F this afternoon and i uploaded it to A.net just now would you please helpme have look if it can be passable ? Thank you for your valuable time.
Best wishes,
Junjie Li

airkas1 · Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:08 pm

Looks somewhat hazed. Titles, tail, registration look a bit jaggy.

HarryLi · Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:12 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Looks somewhat hazed. Titles, tail, registration look a bit jaggy.

Oh , really ? So maybe I should use eraser to clean them out ?

airkas1 · Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:38 pm

Yeah, give that a try.

HarryLi · Sun Feb 12, 2017 3:16 am

airkas1 wrote:
Yeah, give that a try.

Hello Kas ,
I have used the eraser to clean the jaggy . What about now ? Is it better than before and passable ? :roll:

Cheers,
Junjie Li

airkas1 · Sun Feb 12, 2017 10:24 am

I don't know, you didn't link it

(Just posting the link will be sufficient)

HarryLi · Sun Feb 12, 2017 10:49 am

airkas1 wrote:
I don't know, you didn't link it
(Just posting the link will be sufficient)

Oh jesus ! Very sorry about that .It seems that my network is not very kind today.Here is the link.

airkas1 · Sun Feb 12, 2017 11:57 am

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

HarryLi · Sun Feb 12, 2017 12:20 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

Yes ! I think so I didn't feel any changes I don't know why. I use it with the following steps:
1. Open the picture and copy a layer
2. Use eraser to clean the jaggy in the layer ( Hard:100% Size :10)
3. Combine the layers.
4. Finished and saved.
I don't know where is the problem hope u can help me. Thank you very much !

HarryLi · Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:07 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

Hey Kas , here is my new upload photo hope your advice.

airkas1 · Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:47 pm

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

HarryLi · Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:06 pm

airkas1 wrote:
It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

All right , that's ok maybe I can just make it become a collection. Anyway thanks.
Cheers,
Junjie Lee

HarryLi · Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:27 pm

airkas1 wrote:
It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

Hi , Kas
I finished three photos today and uploaded them to the website.Uh....would you please give me some opinions on it ? Thanks. :shock:

Mahan Air A346

Cheers ,
Junjie Lee

HarryLi · Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:04 pm

airkas1 wrote:
It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

And here is the photo that i uploaded today. :bouncy:

airkas1 · Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:35 pm

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

HarryLi · Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:15 pm

airkas1 wrote:
All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

Hi , Kas thank you very much.But i think the China Airlines color can be better and i changed the color with the same photo.The following are the 2 photos that i have changed . Which is better ?

Cheers ,
Junjie Lee

HarryLi · Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:37 pm

airkas1 wrote:
All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

airkas1 · Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:49 pm

HarryLi wrote:
Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

HarryLi wrote:
I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

HarryLi · Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:17 pm

airkas1 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

You mean the first one in 37# or the first photo in 36# ? I prefer the first one in 37# actually because i took this photo in the sunset so the airplane body has a little yellow...not nature i think.So i revise the color to be more white...What do you think ?
HarryLi wrote:
I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

You mean the first one in 37# or the first photo in 36# ? I prefer the first one in 37# actually because i took this photo in the sunset so the airplane body has a little yellow...not nature i think.So i revise the color to be more white...What do you think ? :roll:

Oops , i think the high contrast problem might be resulted by my Mode choice because i took this photo 2 years ago and i used "Landscape" Mode with JPEG instead of RAW. :snooty:

HarryLi · Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:26 pm

airkas1 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

HarryLi wrote:
I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

And i think that the first pic in 36# the BG color a little green or what ? I think it's strange

airkas1 · Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:41 pm

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

HarryLi · Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:44 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Got it ! Thank you very much :spin:

!

HarryLi · Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:50 am

airkas1 wrote:
Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Hi Kas,
I uploaded a Thai B744 today and here is the photo how's that ?

HarryLi · Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:41 am

airkas1 wrote:
Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

And here is a rejected photo that i revised just now .The headscreener Rejected me with one reason----Harsh Contrast too high.And then i low it down is it passable now ?

HarryLi · Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:47 pm

HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:
Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Hi Kas,
I uploaded a Thai B744 today and here is the photo how's that ?

aH...I think this one is better than the other .

airkas1 · Sat Feb 18, 2017 1:57 pm

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

HarryLi · Sat Feb 18, 2017 2:24 pm

airkas1 wrote:
QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

Ok , i will revise the QF later . Uh...i finished a B-2056 just now ... i took it many years ago..and uploaded today...Is it passable ? :roll:

I took it at dawn so ... i chose dawn

HarryLi · Sat Feb 18, 2017 2:36 pm

airkas1 wrote:
QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

All right , here is the QF that i revised just now.

Is it better and acceptable ?

airkas1 · Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:47 pm

CZ: quite yellow, otherwise passable
QF: better

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net