Hi every one ,
I uploaded some photos to A.net recently but some of them i am not sure if it can accept hope u guys can give some advice.

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :


Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :


And finally is window view , also is my first time.


Thank u for all of your valuable time !
Cheers,
HarryLi

HarryLi wrote:

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Overexposed, soft, high in frame.

HarryLi wrote:

Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

The overexposed outside really detracts from the photo in my opinion. I don't know how A.net will see it, as they sometimes allow that.

HarryLi wrote:

And finally is window view , also is my first time

Wing is overexposed. Looks OK to me otherwise.

And here is another one.This one i am not sure about the sharpeness.

HarryLi wrote:

And here is another one.This one i am not sure about the sharpeness.

A touch soft if anything, but OK for me. However, much of the fuse is blown out.

And here is the latest Special Livery of Hai nan Airlines.What do u think about this ?

CZ A380: looks passable.
Cockpit: outside OE and the center console & steering columns look a litte blurry.
Wingview: I think the exposure of the wing is passable, although the ground below could be a bit brighter maybe.
Malaysian: titles & tail look a little jaggy.
Hainan: looks ok.

airkas1 wrote:

CZ A380: looks passable.
Cockpit: outside OE and the center console & steering columns look a litte blurry.
Wingview: I think the exposure of the wing is passable, although the ground below could be a bit brighter maybe.
Malaysian: titles & tail look a little jaggy.
Hainan: looks ok.

Ok， thank you for your comment Kas. So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

vikkyvik wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Overexposed, soft, high in frame.

HarryLi wrote:

Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

The overexposed outside really detracts from the photo in my opinion. I don't know how A.net will see it, as they sometimes allow that.

HarryLi wrote:

And finally is window view , also is my first time

Wing is overexposed. Looks OK to me otherwise.

Thank you for your comment too Vik.

HarryLi wrote:

So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

Correct.

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

Correct.

What about now ?

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

HarryLi wrote:

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

.0.0. Hi again. I want to have a try to upload a big size photo (1500*1000).And here is . This is my first time upload such a big photo to A.net.Hope you guys can give some opinions! Thank you very much.

HarryLi wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

.0.0. Hi again. I want to have a try to upload a big size photo (1500*1000).And here is . This is my first time upload such a big photo to A.net.Hope you guys can give some opinions! Thank you very much.

Is it passable for screener?

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

Ok, thanks.But ..i don't consider that the level problem is very serious.Can it be passable if i don't change it ?Because if i fix the level i think i should start the whole photo again.

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

AND the road of here is not 100% level so the pole mane not 100% vertical so maybe can not make a standard with the pole

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

I circled the title area and sharpened it again carefully.How's look now ?

Hi everyone ,
I got a Kuwait Air force C-130J this afternoon and it is very rare to see C-130 in Guangzhou also this is the Kuwait Air Force C130 first time come to Guangzhou.So i very hope this photo can be accepted by screener in other word your opinion also very important for me.I don't know if this can be passable ?

Cheers,
Junjie Li

HarryLi wrote:

Hi everyone ,
I got a Kuwait Air force C-130J this afternoon and it is very rare to see C-130 in Guangzhou also this is the Kuwait Air Force C130 first time come to Guangzhou.So i very hope this photo can be accepted by screener in other word your opinion also very important for me.I don't know if this can be passable ?

Cheers,
Junjie Li

Sorry guys i changed something in this photo and the following is the correct photo.

CZ A330: Could be a little sharpend ideally, but I probably wouldn't reject it for it as it currently us. However, in my opinion it still needs CCW.
C-130: Looks a little OS at the front & titles. Perhaps a little blurryish, but I'd say passable.

Small note in general; please don't quote full pictures. It clutters the thread, which makes it a little hard to get a good oversight.

airkas1 wrote:

CZ A330: Could be a little sharpend ideally, but I probably wouldn't reject it for it as it currently us. However, in my opinion it still needs CCW.
C-130: Looks a little OS at the front & titles. Perhaps a little blurryish, but I'd say passable.

Small note in general; please don't quote full pictures. It clutters the thread, which makes it a little hard to get a good oversight.

Ok I will not quote the whole pic next time. But I have to say i have check my original photo with 100% view I can not see any blurry.

Hi guys , i got a GEC MD-11F this afternoon and i uploaded it to A.net just now would you please helpme have look if it can be passable ? Thank you for your valuable time.
Best wishes,
Junjie Li

Looks somewhat hazed. Titles, tail, registration look a bit jaggy.

airkas1 wrote:

Looks somewhat hazed. Titles, tail, registration look a bit jaggy.

Oh , really ? So maybe I should use eraser to clean them out ?

Yeah, give that a try.

airkas1 wrote:

Yeah, give that a try.

Hello Kas ,
I have used the eraser to clean the jaggy . What about now ? Is it better than before and passable ?
Cheers,
Junjie Li

I don't know, you didn't link it
(Just posting the link will be sufficient)

airkas1 wrote:

I don't know, you didn't link it
(Just posting the link will be sufficient)

Oh jesus ! Very sorry about that .It seems that my network is not very kind today.Here is the link.

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

airkas1 wrote:

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

Yes ! I think so I didn't feel any changes I don't know why. I use it with the following steps:
1. Open the picture and copy a layer
2. Use eraser to clean the jaggy in the layer ( Hard:100% Size :10)
3. Combine the layers.
4. Finished and saved.
I don't know where is the problem hope u can help me. Thank you very much !

airkas1 wrote:

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

Hey Kas , here is my new upload photo hope your advice.

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

All right , that's ok maybe I can just make it become a collection. Anyway thanks.
Cheers,
Junjie Lee

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

Hi , Kas
I finished three photos today and uploaded them to the website.Uh....would you please give me some opinions on it ? Thanks.
Mahan Air A346



Cheers ,
Junjie Lee

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

And here is the photo that i uploaded today.

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

airkas1 wrote:

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

Hi , Kas thank you very much.But i think the China Airlines color can be better and i changed the color with the same photo.The following are the 2 photos that i have changed . Which is better ?



Cheers ,
Junjie Lee

airkas1 wrote:

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

You mean the first one in 37# or the first photo in 36# ? I prefer the first one in 37# actually because i took this photo in the sunset so the airplane body has a little yellow...not nature i think.So i revise the color to be more white...What do you think ?

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

You mean the first one in 37# or the first photo in 36# ? I prefer the first one in 37# actually because i took this photo in the sunset so the airplane body has a little yellow...not nature i think.So i revise the color to be more white...What do you think ?

Oops , i think the high contrast problem might be resulted by my Mode choice because i took this photo 2 years ago and i used "Landscape" Mode with JPEG instead of RAW.

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

And i think that the first pic in 36# the BG color a little green or what ? I think it's strange

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Got it ! Thank you very much !

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Hi Kas,
I uploaded a Thai B744 today and here is the photo how's that ?

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

And here is a rejected photo that i revised just now .The headscreener Rejected me with one reason----Harsh Contrast too high.And then i low it down is it passable now ?

HarryLi wrote:

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Hi Kas,
I uploaded a Thai B744 today and here is the photo how's that ?

aH...I think this one is better than the other .

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

airkas1 wrote:

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

Ok , i will revise the QF later . Uh...i finished a B-2056 just now ... i took it many years ago..and uploaded today...Is it passable ?

I took it at dawn so ... i chose dawn

airkas1 wrote:

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

All right , here is the QF that i revised just now. Is it better and acceptable ?

CZ: quite yellow, otherwise passable
QF: better