seajet001
Topic Author
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:49 am

Post Screening: Motive

Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:58 pm

This was rejected for Motive, and previously rejected for contrast before that.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncanmonk/6944659308/in/photostream

A few days after this was rejected another photographers shot from the side showing just the boom and none of the aircraft was accepted. Confused!

Thoughts?

Thanks

Dunk
seajet001
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Post Screening: Motive

Wed Apr 18, 2012 4:10 pm

I would refer to the comments left with the rejection. If you did not receive them, let me know, and I can pass them along.
 
seajet001
Topic Author
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:49 am

RE: Post Screening: Motive

Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:41 am

Yes the comments would be helpful, than you.
seajet001
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Post Screening: Motive

Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:59 pm

Quoting seajet001 (Reply 2):
Yes the comments would be helpful, than you.

I'll assume that wasn't meant to be a sarcastic reply (would be MORE helpful than you), but just a missing 'k' (thanK you)  

The comments given with the rejection were "motive, too tight crop". If you compare yours to the other taken at the same time you alluded to (I'm assuming you were referring to Mr. Gould's), then it should make a bit more sense now.
 
seajet001
Topic Author
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 2:49 am

RE: Post Screening: Motive

Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:41 pm

Hi

Thanks for posting the rejection comments, duly noted.

Yes the 'K' was missed off, apologies , it does read sarcastic without the 'K' doesnt it!

Regards

Dunk
seajet001

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests