User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:16 pm

Hello, I got the following photo rejected due to level, CCW is needed acc. screener and head screener. Yes, it's maybe a very lil bit unleveled round 0.5mm from left to right. I leveled along the other runway far in the picture.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20728_q1342693196.425403hs-tld.jpg

I compared a similar picture from the same position and found out it's the same "unlevel" (search for HS-TLD at Munich MUC/EDDM). That's why I don't understand the reject.

Same reason also for this picture: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20720_c1341983582.294214b-6076.jpg

I guess they wish the level along the field in the back, but unfortunatly the distance at the left side between fence and trees is half the way on the right side so it's not possible to level there.

[Edited 2012-07-29 12:19:53]
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:30 pm

On the first photo, I would level by the smokestack or whatever that tower is in the distance. It's leaning to the right, which is likely why you got the rejection.

On the 2nd, it was rejected needing CCW also? Or CW?

In general, if possible, you want to level by verticals near the center of the photo.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
Tomskii
Posts: 451
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 10:42 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:48 pm

First needs a bit of CCW as said by vikky (reference should be that tower in the distance)

Second one needs CW and also base yourself on the tower in the distance.
Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:53 pm

Yes, I've already saw it's a bit unlevel but what I don't understand, that another picture from the same position got accepted although it's also unlevel the same like mine.

The other shown (Air China) needs CW rotation.

In the last time I heard from many spotter friends that there are some strange rejects at airliners.net in the moment they don't understand.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:04 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 3):
Yes, I've already saw it's a bit unlevel but what I don't understand, that another picture from the same position got accepted although it's also unlevel the same like mine.

If you agree it's unlevel, then just fix it and re-upload. Don't worry about other people's shots. I've found that's the best (and easiest) way to look at things.

If you look hard enough, you're bound to find photos that break rules. It's pretty inevitable with over 2 million photos here.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Jul 29, 2012 9:48 pm

Re-upload is already done. Will see what the result is.

Yes that's true. I know, the screeners also are humans and humans sometimes make mistakes   But in this case another screener told me the picture is level so yes  
 
Tomskii
Posts: 451
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 10:42 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:48 pm

And don't forget that human factor is variable, one spotter might see the level as acceptable, whilst others want it totally perfect.  
Nikon D90 + Nikkor f4.5-5.6 18-105mm + Tamron f4-5.6 70-300mm
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Aug 13, 2012 3:34 pm

The Thai picture with a rework is now avail in the data base, thanks for your help.

Now I got two pictures rejected with "high contrast". I'm not often take shots with the planes in front of the blue sky, normally I prefer ground shots. So I don't have so much experience in the correct editing with such pictures. In my opinion they look like it real was at that time.

Visit here and here.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Aug 13, 2012 5:43 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 7):
Now I got two pictures rejected with "high contrast". I'm not often take shots with the planes in front of the blue sky, normally I prefer ground shots. So I don't have so much experience in the correct editing with such pictures. In my opinion they look like it real was at that time.

They're not bad - contrast may be just a bit strong. Should be a quick and easy fix.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:18 pm

Today I would like to hear your opinion concerning following picture in the queue:

D-ABFK

Do you guys guess this one will have a chance to get accepted? Or is it a problem that one not can see the full landing gear due to the lower taxiway compared to the runway?
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:02 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 9):
oday I would like to hear your opinion concerning following picture

Yes, gear being cut will be a problem as it looks like it was avoidable if you had waited a bit longer.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:22 pm

No, it wasn't avoidable because the A380 in the back was moving and the A320 holding two minutes longer.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:43 pm

Could someone please tell me what's not ok with the quality? Reason is 'heat hazes'. Do they mean the jet blast?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...lename=w1345993615.83914yr-bgi.jpg
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:38 pm

No, as stated many times before, heat haze and jet wash are two different things. Heat haze is usually visible when shooting subjects from a distance, and/or when climatic conditions are right (different temperature gradients in the air). You can notice it on the leading edges of the wings of the aircraft in your image (which should be straight, hard edges but are not), and around the nose. Shooting at a distance on a warm day is a typical cause of this problem.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:49 pm

Well, now I have again a question to you all.

I got a picture of Etihad's beautiful Formula 1 A340 twice rejected, first time as soft, second time as yellow colour cast and oversharpened although I used about 5 per cent more sharpness than the first trial. Now I uploaded the pic a third time, again reworked. Do you think it's now ok to get accepted? Editing is like ballancing on a knife I feel here at airliners  http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/q1367239055.412907_a6-ehj.jpg

And I have another question concerning an A330 of South African arriving in the early morning. I'm not sure if the picture is too dark, but with the light it wasn't possible to take it in a different way and all spotters in our local forum really like this picture, also my screener friends.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/h1367047360.387403zs-sxz.jpg

Greetings
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:35 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 14):
I got a picture of Etihad's beautiful Formula 1 A340

Sharpening still borderline, but maybe passable

Quoting moddin (Reply 14):
And I have another question concerning an A330 of South African arriving in the early morning.

Backlighting is somewhat effective, but the white balance looks quite warm.

Quoting moddin (Reply 14):
all spotters in our local forum really like this picture, also my screener friends.

I'm sure you realize that will have no effect on its chances of acceptance.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:06 pm

Ok thank you Dana.

Will have a look for the result  
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun May 05, 2013 4:29 pm

Hi!

On Friday we had a really great highlight at my home airport Munich unfortunately in bad weather conditions but I tried to make the best out of it. Know I have the feeling it's a bit dark, but if I lighten up it, it seems to be overexposed. Would like to hear your opinion to the picture, thank you.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/k1367614475.9358049k-gba.jpg
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun May 05, 2013 11:40 pm

A bit blue and could use a smidge of contrast. Exposure looks OK. Looks slightly oversharpened, too, but might be OK.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:41 pm

Well, again all uploaded pictures except of two got rejected the last days (one of the two accepted I already got rejected two months ago, doesn't changed anything and now got accepted!?). Most of the others are already rejected ones I improved, but every time the same reason plus one new additional. And all got grainy rejections.

Now some questions: what's wrong with the contrast? Halos and oversharpening I can see. But grain I cannot see. Maybe someone could explain where. Or does it appear while sizing it down?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ename=w1369415286.119603zs-sxz.jpg

Also grainy and now low contrast (before only grainy, no changes with the contrast)

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...name=p1369414890.672614d-abuia.jpg

I don't know what to do that you accept the pictures although there are so many bad ones in the data base  
 
angad84
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:21 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 19):
one of the two accepted I already got rejected two months ago, doesn't changed anything and now got accepted

While this is indeed unusual, you can get a warning/ban if you re-upload shots without changing anything. Still, something for the screeners to look into, standards-wise.

Can't help with the images, unfortunately. To my untrained eye the second looks ok and I can't spot grain in the first.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:46 am

Hello. Again me.
Just got this approach shot rejected with corners little too dark and land little too soft.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ename=c1375644258.737105anflug.jpg

Can someone tell me how I could get the corners brighter? And why should I sharpen the landscape more? In natura it never is sharp. It can't be sharp.

Rgds
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:28 am

Quoting moddin (Reply 19):
Well, again all uploaded pictures except of two got rejected the last days (one of the two accepted I already got rejected two months ago, doesn't changed anything and now got accepted!?)

There have been some modifications to screening criteria recently - you can read about them in the Photography forum.

With that said, if you think some of your previously-rejected shots would be acceptable per the modified criteria, it's wise to put a note to that effect in the "message to screeners" box. Otherwise, it can lead to a warning/ban, as Angad stated.

Quoting moddin (Reply 21):
Can someone tell me how I could get the corners brighter? And why should I sharpen the landscape more? In natura it never is sharp. It can't be sharp.

The wing is soft too, and overall quality doesn't look great - would be better at a smaller size. Given that the wing only occupies a small portion of the image, the landscape is part of the subject.

For the corners (vignetting), I think Photoshop has an anti-vignetting feature....can't remember for sure though.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:11 pm

Well, I searched for another wing shots in flight, and nearly all have those dark corners, mostly darker than in my case.

The reason why the wing only occupies a small portion of the image is that we made a right turn so if the wing would be in the middle you mostly see water and clouds and no Teide (highest mountain in Spain, highest volcano in Europe) and only a part of the capital. If I made the picture smaller, the details will miss.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11799
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:41 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 23):
The reason why the wing only occupies a small portion of the image is that we made a right turn so if the wing would be in the middle you mostly see water and clouds and no Teide (highest mountain in Spain, highest volcano in Europe) and only a part of the capital. If I made the picture smaller, the details will miss.

I know that, and that's fine, but then the landscape has to be sharp, being the focus of the image.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:55 pm

Ok thank you. I reworked it and will later upload if I have again free space in the queue.
Rgds
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:09 pm

Hi, again questions for two rejects.

First one in this CRJ in front of the Queen: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...0824_t1376314381.213320_d-ackh.jpg

Isn't it too sharp? Got it rejected with soft. Due the angle the letters look so sharp, also in the original image on the cam. Is this also the fact for the other reason compression? Is it possible to get this image in an acceptable way for the data base?

And here the second reject I'm a bit confused: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...30824_v1376314161.189919d-aidg.jpg

Well, one reject reason, the spot, I can confirm. Don't know how it could happen that I didn't see this big spot. It's a bit unbelievable although I know that there is a spot in my cam. But what you mean with the editing reject (comment from screener: "do not oversaturate colours in post"). For taking this picture (also another round 15 planes) I used manual settings in my cam so that it was already a very orange sky and black silhouette of the plane on my cam. I only added a little bit of more contrast, nothing more changed. So don't know what's wrong with the editing as this was the real light conditions at this time.

PS: those comments from the screeners are very helpful, thanks for that  
 
mjgbtv
Posts: 877
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:18 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:16 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 26):
First one in this CRJ in front of the Queen:

I don't really see anything soft here. Maybe the wrong box was checked? Not sure about the compression either. I think that oversharpening and sharpening artifacts can appear as compression, and I would agree that the RJ looks a bit oversharpened. Being much smaller than normal in the image probably emphasizes that.

Quoting moddin (Reply 26):
And here the second reject I'm a bit confused:

I am not sure how accurately these colors reflect a sunset viewed live, but it does appear that cameras (or at least digital cameras) tend to produce them, and you can easily find other images that look similar to yours in the db.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:48 am

Thank you mjgbtv for your response. Maybe I will try them after reworking again during the cold winter season.

I now have another one for you, as pre-screening this time. Yesterday we had a beautiful autumn day here at Munich with great colors. But I'm not sure with this picture: http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/e1382477172.107314_zz330.jpg

I have the feeling it's blurry but not sure about. What do you think?
 
mjgbtv
Posts: 877
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:18 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:32 pm

I would not say blurry. Maybe a bit soft and low contrast? The one exception is the port horizontal stabilizer, which does look blurry, but since nothing else looks the same I am thinking it might just be in the jetwash.
 
RCoulter
Posts: 456
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:02 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:58 pm

The whole plane looks blurry to me to be honest...
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:14 pm

Hello, just got this picture of an Emirates whale rejected with 'oversharpened'

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...name=n1386826899.944107_a6-edv.jpg

Well, now I'm searching for signs of oversharpening but I cannot see any stairs or white lines next to the borders. Can someone help me before I appeal? Just appealed another picture which is sharper than this but got it twice rejected with soft, so I'm not sure what's going on right now with my monitor.

Thank you in advance.
 
User avatar
alevik
Crew
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:50 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Fri Dec 20, 2013 5:23 pm

Hi Martin;

The Emirates A380 doesn't look oversharpened to me. Perhaps some soft areas near the rear, hard for me to tell as I'm not at my regular screening station. Probably worth an appeal from what I can see.

Pete
Improvise, adapt, overcome.
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Dec 22, 2013 1:53 pm

Hi Pete,

thank you. So I will try it. I don't like to use the appeal function too much.

Martin
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:37 am

Hi. Another problem: http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ename=f1388431068.024903_zh887.jpg

How shall I center the C130 correctly? Got it rejected with high in frame although it (the fuselage) is exactly in the middle of the picture.
 
powwwiii
Crew
Posts: 366
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 4:41 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:31 pm

Because of the tall tail, I would put the center line at about the middle of #4 engine.
 
angad84
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:02 pm

Quoting powwwiii (Reply 35):
Because of the tall tail, I would put the center line at about the middle of #4 engine.

yep, sounds about right.

Great shot by the way!

Cheers
Angad
 
User avatar
moddin
Topic Author
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:48 pm

Hi again.

Can you help me in advance with these three pictures as my recent uploads of the last three weeks all got rejected and I'm now a bit frustrated about this.

All pictures are taken with the Canon EOS600D in the AV mode and my not loved Tamron 18-270mm lense.

The Thai was taken at 7.15am some minutes after sunrise. After the upload to airliners it looks much softer than I've edited it in Photoshop.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/o1425845802.977703_hs-tgw.jpg

For this Aeroflot I need your help with the contrast and the sharpness as well (as this is my most reject reason).

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/u1425846843.737112_vp-bdk.jpg

With the SAA I'm not getting warm with the colors but I don't know how to get them better. I've tried several versions but this is the best one. Unfortunately the sun was behind a thin layer of clouds but still was visible so the light was really strange.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/v1425847075.237915_zs-sni.jpg

Thank you in advance, Martin
 
User avatar
kann123air
Posts: 1495
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:35 am

RE: Pre-/Post-Screening Moddin

Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:26 pm

Quoting moddin (Reply 37):
For this Aeroflot I need your help with the contrast and the sharpness as well (as this is my most reject reason).

I think the contrast is fine. It looks a bit oversharpened to me, particularly on the titles and tail.

South African looks fine to me but maybe a little soft towards the front (nose gear and Mandela sticker). Be careful though as the titles and the rest of the plane look perfectly sharpened if not borderline OS. Also it might need some CCW.

Amrit
Now more than ever, moving forward with the new American.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests