Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

Screening - Gasman

Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:50 am

Hi everyone

Is this worth submitting? Previously rejected for being too soft around the nose. Cheers.

 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:35 am

Quoting gasman (Thread starter):
Is this worth submitting?

Don't think so. Looks soft (maybe a bit blurry) all over, and oversharpened to compensate.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:30 pm

I was wondering if this one was worth a shot. Too much noise?

Cheers.

 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:43 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 2):
Too much noise?

Unfortunately, yes.

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 2:52 am

Thanks. How about now?

 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:21 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 4):
How about now?

That appears to be the same image. It is also flat and dirty, in addition to noisy.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:41 am

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 5):
That appears to be the same image. It is also flat and dirty, in addition to noisy.

Thanks. The difference between the two was some tweaking with noise reduction and sharpening in LR4 - obviously not enough!

I can see what you mean by "flat", but by "dirty" do you mean sensor dirt? Not sure I can see this...

Thanks again.  
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 3:49 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 6):
but by "dirty" do you mean sensor dirt?

Yes, in the sky above the titles.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:19 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 6):
do you mean sensor dirt? Not sure I can see this...

Use the "equalise" function in photoshop and it should highlight this for you.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:23 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 8):
Use the "equalise" function in photoshop and it should highlight this for you.

Thanks...... although could one argue if the dirt can't be seen on the "unequalised" JPEG, it kind of doesn't matter?



Trying again.......... this one is actually a different frame.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:30 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 9):
Thanks...... although could one argue if the dirt can't be seen on the "unequalised" JPEG, it kind of doesn't matter?

Not to you, but if we can see it without equalizing, it does. Equalizing is not part of the screening process.

Quoting gasman (Reply 9):
Trying again.......... this one is actually a different frame.

Still flat, noisy, and dirty.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:17 am

Any chance? Cheers.


Nope. Soft. Am discovering it's easier to see flaws with the blue background of a.net than it is in Lightroom. Intriguing.

[Edited 2012-09-11 00:36:59]

Better now?

Big version: Width: 1050 Height: 700 File size: 540kb


[Edited 2012-09-11 00:47:56]
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:49 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 11):
Better now?

Soft, flat, and dirty.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:33 am

Thanks. While my editing skills are far from perfect, I suspect the RAW file which was underexposed by about a stop isn't ressurectable. Would it also be fair to say that not many a.net photos are shot on heavily overcast days?
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:41 am

Heavily overcast days can make it harder.. But it's still not impossible. Do you use the levels function for contrast? If not, play around with that until you get a greener grass (and more 'body' to the plane), eg:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Nicholas Young



Move the right slider up to where the histogram shows values and move the left slider up to the start of the histogram and tinker with the middle one until you get a decent constrast.

RAWs are much easier to brighten up - I don't think it's as much of an issue here compared with the soft/contrast issues.

[Edited 2012-09-11 04:56:47]
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:41 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 13):
Would it also be fair to say that not many a.net photos are shot on heavily overcast days?

It doesn't preclude images from being accepted, just makes it a lot more difficult. Any particular reason you have for wanting the above image accepted? If not, just forget it, and go back and do more shooting with better light.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:57 pm

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 14):
Heavily overcast days can make it harder.. But it's still not impossible. Do you use the levels function for contrast?

I'm using Lightroom 4 at the moment, which doesn't use levels. "Supposedly" the white/black sliders on LR do the job better for RAW files. Something to do with gamma encoded vs. linear images, way too technical for me, and I always considered myself a geek  

Also, while there are many photos on a.net taken on equipment way inferior to my 30D; I'm starting to suspect that could be a factor too. Noise is definitely an issue at ISO 400 and the pictures become almost unusable any higher. Scanning through a.net, the "bar" has definitely lifted over even the last five years.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:46 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 16):
I'm using Lightroom 4 at the moment, which doesn't use levels

I process in LR4 and then open it up in PS to finish it off - add extra sharpening, levels, dust spots etc. I can't seem to work the black/white sliders too well on LR and find that levels suits me much better.

Quoting gasman (Reply 16):
Scanning through a.net, the "bar" has definitely lifted over even the last five years.

Well you won't be wrong about that.. I look at pics I uploaded here from a couple of years back which are quite similar to the ones you posted here.. Though maybe slightly more contrasted. Even so, shooting at AKL during the day shouldn't really require ISO400 but I suppose you chose a dull day for it. A day like today would likely yield pretty nice results - cool weather reducing haze and very little cloud around.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:34 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 17):
A day like today would likely yield pretty nice results

Now it's funny you should say that............... shot about 2 hours ago  
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:16 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 18):

Nice to see you finally got some good weather!

I still think you need to use photoshop too.. There are a few things which remain soft - most notably the winglet. I'd be inclined to decrease brightness a touch. The sky seems a little grainy too. But a far better chance with this image compared to the earlier ones.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:51 am

Yes, soft and a little bright. You've also got the dust spot in about the same place as with the NZ 777.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:12 am

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 20):
Yes, soft

Arrgh! 1/1250 sec, panned, IS on L series lens, shot in RAW at ISO 100 and not cropped. And yes, it is still slightly soft.

Time for a full frame sensor and more megapixels - unless anyone has any other ideas...

Thanks for all the help NZ107 & dlowwa.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:19 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 21):
Time for a full frame sensor and more megapixels - unless anyone has any other ideas...

None of my images here were taken with a full-frame sensor camera, and I would say the same goes for 90% of the images on this site. A good number of mine were taken with a camera comparable to your 30D. I don't think the tools are the issue here. You're either expecting too much, or not getting the full potential out of your equipment/images. A 30D with a decent lens should be more than enough to get acceptable images for here, unless you're pushing the limits by doing something like shooting from a distance and cropping a lot.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:51 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 21):
1/1250 sec

Hmm.. Seems a bit fast.. I was there for a few mins on Sunday and had pics at f/8 with 1/800sec. But anyway, I would still recommend the use of photoshop after the initial touch ups in LR.

Quoting gasman (Reply 21):

Time for a full frame sensor and more megapixels - unless anyone has any other ideas...

Well I don't know how much more advanced a 40D is.. But I'm doing fine with that at the moment (need a change soon as it's not good enough for low light shots which I've wanted to do for ages and the buffer isn't big enough sometimes). Gonna start saving up for a 5DIII I think but that's just me.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:34 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 21):
Arrgh! 1/1250 sec, panned, IS on L series lens, shot in RAW at ISO 100 and not cropped. And yes, it is still slightly soft.

What was the aperture? Maybe you can stop it down a litte as most lenses are sharper between f/8-10. With a shutter speed that fast, you can afford to lose a little and close the aperture.

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:57 pm

Quoting dazbo5 (Reply 24):
What was the aperture?

Wide open (f5.6). I take your point, but I was thinking that on a Canon L series it shouldn't matter so much. Maybe it does..............
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:11 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 25):
Wide open (f5.6). I take your point, but I was thinking that on a Canon L series it shouldn't matter so much. Maybe it does..............

It depends on the model. Primes it matters less but on a 100-400 for example, it's like most others and is slightly sharper stopped down. That explains the probable shallow depth of field. Good equipment helps, but you still need to get the technique right. It's a little 'overexposed' for this site as well, -1/3 exposure compensation would probably have done the trick.

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:06 pm

How about this?

 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:28 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 25):
I take your point, but I was thinking that on a Canon L series it shouldn't matter so much.

Don't forget depth of field is also affected by opening the aperture right up.
Especially when it's sunny, there's no need for such fast shutter speeds; especially if you can shoot at around f/8 and still be 1/500th or faster.

Quoting gasman (Reply 27):
How about this?

Looking good, though once again, I personally would be inclined to open it up in photoshop and give it a once over with the sharpen tool. Might still be passable though; can't tell with this monitor too well.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:36 pm

Quoting gasman (Reply 27):
How about this?

Dirty, but otherwise ok.
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:16 am

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 29):
Dirty, but otherwise ok.

There's a dust spot above the 'e' on the tail. What about the amount of noise in the sky? Surely this is more than the acceptable criteria? I've had noise rejections with way less noise than is in the sky!

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
dazbo5
Posts: 2717
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:05 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:20 am

Quoting dlowwa (Reply 29):
Dirty, but otherwise ok.

There's a dust spot above the 'e' on the tail. What about the amount of noise in the sky? Surely this is more than the acceptable criteria? I've had noise rejections with way less noise than is in the sky!

Darren
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:58 am

Could I have some critique of this one please?

Much appreciated guys.

 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:33 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 32):
Could I have some critique of this one please?

Marginal light, cyan tint, and as with all of the others, dirty.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:55 am

Is this better? Sorry to persist but I'm having genuine trouble seeing the dirtiness. Cheers.

 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Sep 15, 2012 7:32 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 34):
Sorry to persist but I'm having genuine trouble seeing the dirtiness.

Apparently not, as you've removed the dust spot in this version.

Color is still pretty bad.

http://imageshack.us/a/img708/2519/php2kaqlh.jpg
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:33 am

Can I have some feedback on this one please?

Many thanks

 
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:36 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 36):

Seems to me like it's slightly blurry/oversharpened, also seemingly soft and I the chromatic abberation is quite noticeable. A little grainy too - guess the cloud was in the way.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:20 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 36):
Can I have some feedback on this one please?

Quality is quite poor, as Nicholas has pointed out. Doubt you will be able to fix this one unfortunately.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:08 am

Hi again

Could I ask for some feedback on this one please?

Regards.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:00 am

A bit soft and flat. Watch that horizontal stabiliser.
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:15 am

Better - or have I overcooked things now?

 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:58 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 41):
Better - or have I overcooked things now?

To be honest, the light is really poor, so unless you have some special reason for wanting to see this one accepted, I would just leave it and move on to something shot in better light.
 
Gasman
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:04 am

Hi there. Can I have some feedback on this please? I've done my best with it, but something i can't quite quantify doesn't sit right with me.

Cheers
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Screening - Gasman

Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:35 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 43):
Can I have some feedback on this please?

Contrast is very low and it is backlit. Unfortunately, not much you can do to make it acceptable for here.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest