I just had this one rejected for double:
I know that I often push this to the limit, without exaggeration (IMHO) and hence sometimes bump into double rejections, as in this case. I assume it was rejected double with this one in mind:
Photo © Walter Van Bel
Although it was shot on the same day, I thought it was different enough not to warrant a double rejection, since:
* the aircraft is in a different configuration (one with wings swept forward, the other with wings swept fully aft)
* one shot shows the aircraft making a roll, the other shot is a formation fly-past
* one shot shows more the right side of the aircraft, the other the left side of the aircraft (although I admit they both show more of the bottom-side, but top-side and bottom-side were never used to avoid double rejections).
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks and regards,