JakTrax
Topic Author
Posts: 4635
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:32 pm

Hi all,

This one for done for grain just now.....

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...6817ra-85784_dme_131005_kn_302.jpg

I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:

a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.

It seems a bit picky to me, given the rarity.

Cheers,

Karl
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:36 pm

I probably would have said soft before grain, if anything.. Maybe another pass over the sky?
It's all about the destination AND the journey.
 
vikkyvik
Posts: 11755
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 1:58 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:32 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 1):
Maybe another pass over the sky?

I see noise in the sky, but moreso in the shadows, like under the wing.

Karl, I'd probably submit that one at 1024. Also looks a bit soft and low on contrast.
I'm watching Jeopardy. The category is worst Madonna songs. "This one from 1987 is terrible".
 
JakTrax
Topic Author
Posts: 4635
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:47 pm

Vk, I'm not claiming it's noise-free, but for me it's negligible considering it's an older image of a rare aircraft.
Cheers,

Karl
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:01 am

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
Vk, I'm not claiming it's noise-free, but for me it's negligible considering it's an older image of a rare aircraft.
Cheers,

Karl


Makes no difference to Airliners.net.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
mjgbtv
Posts: 877
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:18 am

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:32 am

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 4):
Makes no difference to Airliners.net.

Per the rejection guide general notes:

1. "Images taken before the digital era (pre 2002 as a rough guideline) will be screened with more leniency..."
2. "Rare aircraft and new registrations will also be screened with more leniency."

But is this old and rare enough? I don't know.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:38 am

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 4):
Makes no difference to Airliners.net.

Not sure if you are referring to the amount of noise or the rarity, but if the latter that is absolutely not true. Older, rare, and in some cases new registrations have more lax standards applied to them.


Quoting mjgbtv (Reply 5):
But is this old and rare enough? I don't know.

2005 and 43 images already on the db, so no, it is not.
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:00 am

Quoting mjgbtv (Reply 5):
Quoting dlowwa (Reply 6):

Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.

This is what I meant to quote...

Quoting JakTrax (Thread starter):
I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:

a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.

It seems a bit picky to me, given the rarity.

2005 isn't old enough.

Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.

It's not the first photo of the aircraft in the DB.

Hope that clears it up.
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)

Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:18 am

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7):
Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.
Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7):
Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.

Ok, that makes a lot more sense  , and you're about right with that.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests