Sponsored Links:
Commercial Flight School, Charter Flights, Model Airplanes, Airport Parking, Cheap Flights, Discount Digital Cameras
Commercial Flight School, Charter Flights, Model Airplanes, Airport Parking, Cheap Flights, Discount Digital Cameras
Picture of the Airbus A340-642 aircraft
[ Medium Large Fit Screen ]
URL (link) to this photo: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Etihad-Airways/Airbus-A340-642/1293784/L/
This photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission. More info.
 |
|
|
 |
||
|
|
|
This photo carries a visible watermark. Why?
Rate and comment on this photo by clicking on the star rating below: 
 |
| |||||||||||||
Link to me!
| Add to Album |
Send as Postcard |
View Similar Photos | Correct information |
Cross data search |
[ Medium Large Fit Screen ]
|
| Visitor comments (141) [Hide] | Post your own comments by rating the photo above! |
 A visitor from - posted Thu October 29, 2009:This photo just shows that although the same testing has been done before, time and time again, there is always maybe that margin of error that can cause a US$200 million accident. I hope that if there was anyone in the cockpit, that they were OK as there is no mention of this. | |
| A visitor from - posted Tue October 20, 2009: Cool. :) | |
| A visitor from - posted Mon October 19, 2009: This aircraft did not jump chocks - there were no chocks installed prior to engine run up. an untrained member of ground maintenance crew took all 4 engines to MCT- causing the take off config warning to sound... Then.. one of the crew decided to pull the GPWS aural alarm breaker - however this defeated the air/ground logic, telling the a/c it was in the air. Thus the brakes were all released, (safety feature to stop the a/c landing with the brakes on). The engines remained at MCT for just under 10 seconds - they were not retarded prior to hitting the wall. expensive error there. | |
| A visitor from - posted Tue October 13, 2009: Wow that's an expensive mistake! Such a shame. Excellent photo though. | |
 A visitor from Spain posted Sat September 19, 2009:Very Nice,Sad for the peepz onboard. That was a bit stupid though because it plummeted straight into it on landing before ripping the Cockpit! Looks like a sad day for the Pilots. | |
 A visitor from Brazil posted Mon July 27, 2009:Great Photo! Bad plane! I think it | |
 A visitor from United Kingdom posted Wed July 22, 2009:Guess its not a jump jet!! | |
 A visitor from United States posted Thu July 9, 2009:An Etihad spokesman said the canceled order related to an aircraft which rammed into a concrete wall during engine testing at the planemaker's Toulouse headquarters in November 2007, injuring 9 people including 4 seriously. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Thu July 9, 2009: This aircraft was part of an order for 8 A340-600. Because of this accident, Etihad announced July 8,2009 that 1 aircraft is cut from the order. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat June 27, 2009: Message from Airbus to Etihad: We regret to inform you that delivery of your new A340 will be delayed. | |
| A visitor from - posted Wed April 29, 2009: Why. why did it have to happen to such a beautiful bird :(:(:( why not a a380. they're ugly. not the beautiFul one!!! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Tue March 17, 2009: Excellent photo - Not so excellent crew | |
 A visitor from Sweden posted Tue February 24, 2009:Great foto, you really can see the destruction. Why did they use the parking brake instead of disengage it and use the pedals?! Major error any way. | |
 A visitor from Netherlands posted Mon February 23, 2009:What is that sucks for the people that work on it | |
 A visitor from Singapore posted Sat January 10, 2009:Sad fate for a beautiful bird. What can i say? | |
| A visitor from United States posted Thu January 8, 2009: According to Aviation Safety Network... Airplane damage:Destroyed Airplane fate: Written off (damaged beyond repair) "The wheels were not chocked when the crew started engine and brake tests at 15:19" | |
| A visitor from United States posted Thu December 18, 2008: This is great! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Wed November 12, 2008: Wow. this is just too much pain to bear. that could have been mine, except for the crash aspect. wonderful machine, too bad its no more | |
| A visitor from - posted Thu October 23, 2008: This is why I always sit at the BACK of the plane ;) | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat August 16, 2008: Sad pic for me.i love Etihad Airways | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sun August 10, 2008: Very clear shot. What lens/camera was used? From an A&P Mechanic who helped rebuild some wrecks, most is salvageable I'd imagine. We took the nose off a similarly damaged A/C. Mfgr can do computer stress analysis and identify stress points to change. Most of airframe can be re-used as is Ldg gear, systems, engines etc. Much inspection work is required and stringers and skin and some bulkheads to be replaced where heavy damage is, along with possibly doublers added for strength. Cockpit is probably trash, but if crew survived then possibly all instrumentation and much avionics can be reinspected on a bench and recertified. You'd be surprised. As an ATP rated in an airliner that was rebuilt I flew the airliner that was rebuilt on its first flight and it flew like a new A/C. Flew straight and no one would know it was ever damaged, except that it was the only one of its kind that had a special belly doubler where the fuselage "cracked" open and was obvious as it was a mirror finish due to special aluminum and you could comb your hair in the reflection as it shone like Air Force One! | |
 A visitor from Germany posted Fri August 8, 2008:Actually there are 2 blast walls facing each other, that's why the plane could crash into it. MSN 856 ist still at the airbus site, hidden in a hangar. They haven't decided what to do of it yet. | |
 A visitor from Canada posted Tue June 24, 2008:Good example to show how powerful the engines are, and why not to run them all at full power while only chocked. To answer a question/comment below, usually (always) there is at least one person in the cockpit to 'rev' the engines. | |
 A visitor from Italy posted Mon June 16, 2008:The photo is crisp and detailed...just the right angle too. Its also proof that just because you can ride a camel, doesn't mean that your qualified to do this ! | |
 A visitor from Argentina posted Wed June 11, 2008:Come on! We all would love to be there. Just think on the sound!!! | |
 A visitor from Mexico posted Thu May 15, 2008:Everybody have bad days, in this case the poor airbus was turned into junk RIP. But the shot is still cool | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Thu April 24, 2008: Now, correct me if I'm wrong; but shouldn't the blast fence be BEHIND an aircraft during testing, and not in front of it ??? Just a thought !! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat March 22, 2008: Just think. You work for ethiad and you're all excited about getting a brand new 340, watching the engine test...then....BAAAMMM. No more plane for you. sucks | |
| A visitor from Spain posted Thu March 20, 2008: They have a small problem... Great shot!!! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Tue March 11, 2008: Wow!!! | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Wed January 23, 2008: Wow! too bad the airplane had to end like this. It didn't even get to carry a single person (besides Airbus). I'm just glad no one was hurt. it's too bad that in 2 weeks the same airplane crashed. I just hope this doesn't happen to another airplane! | |
| A visitor from Sweden posted Fri January 4, 2008: A whole new airplane ended like this too bad | |
 A visitor from Czech Republic posted Tue December 18, 2007:Here you see how to waste a bright new plane, its soooo sad :( I hope they used some parts for other A340s | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Wed December 12, 2007: I hope they got a new one! | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Tue December 4, 2007: These things happen theres nothing we can do about it but as long as no one was hurt then its ok but if someone was hurt my heart goes out to them | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Sun December 2, 2007: Is there people inside? I wish not! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Thu November 29, 2007: Ouch! I simply can't stop looking at the pic, let alone think what is salvageable or not... I'm sure there's got to be some sort of insurance. | |
 A visitor from France posted Wed November 28, 2007:The gloomy blue-ish light really puts the sad feeling into this shot. It's a bad situation; but a good shot of it. Those people talking about jumping the chocks: Two recent telex messages from Airbus have stated that this aircraft was NOT chocked (confirmed), contrary to procedures. Second Airbus states that all four engines were running at high power (EPR 1.24-1.26, confirmed) which again is contrary to procedures stating only one engine at a time (plus a little power on the other wing for symmetry). Also the late response time to retard to idle was pointed out: 9 seconds from initial movement. The crew were aware of movement, since after 2 seconds they pressed brakes manually and released parking brake, appearantly leaving the engines at high power at this stage. It is not clear who had responsability for the run; Airbus is not confirming that it is them. There was Etihad staff present so it is possibly them (unconfirmed). For sure, some people are going to be in some heavy reviews about this. | |
| A visitor from Czech Republic posted Tue November 27, 2007: The best! | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Tue November 27, 2007: Great picture. Glad it wasn't a 747. | |
 A visitor from Switzerland posted Fri November 23, 2007:A beautiful picture but a bad day for the financial director of Airbus ! | |
| A visitor from - posted Thu November 22, 2007: :S so sad to see all of the first class suites go and all of the luxury equipment. Glad no one was hirt though | |
| A visitor from Netherlands posted Thu November 22, 2007: Sad to see a beauty of a bird like this in this shape. Still it's in this shape even a bigger beauty then a boeing!! | |
 A visitor from Israel posted Thu November 22, 2007:Ouch! What a misfurtune & mishandling. | |
| A visitor from France posted Thu November 22, 2007: Don't think that anything could be saved off this aircraft. By the way you can see the left wing tip, shows that it may have made contact with the wall this is why the right wing is lower. Shame for Airbus and Etihad - hope the injured are ok. | |
| A visitor from Netherlands posted Wed November 21, 2007: If they kept the brake pressure, nothing would have happened... but: because the brake pressure decreased the engines at full throtle caused a nose up movement... luckily there was a wall right after the airplane: can you imagine what it could have caused without the wall? A full throtle aircraft without brakes ''shaving'' around the airport could have costed lives. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Wed November 21, 2007: Obviously a major malfunction | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Wed November 21, 2007: Guys/Gals - this is the 3rd A340-600 mishap this month, an SAA A346 buried its nosegear into the sand in Cape Town while trying to backtrack, then Quito, and now this sad waste of a beautiful plane. What a month - but that should be it now - bad luck happens in threes! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Tue November 20, 2007: Quite a few armchair troubleshooters claiming low brake pressure. brake pressure doesn't help if you don't monitor your minimum fuel weights and the tires break traction. so many factors, maybe we should all let the investigators investigate. photo is excellent showing what can happen when little factors line up to give a bunch of good guys a bad day. | |
 A visitor from Chile posted Tue November 20, 2007:Well done , gracias , | |
| A visitor from France posted Tue November 20, 2007: Ouch..seems that RR engines are actually very powerful.. I think at least 2 or 3 engines, tail, APU or wings are savageable.. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Tue November 20, 2007: Realy sharp focus. the figures give scale to the incident. pity the cropping or original capture did not include more of the nose section. | |
 A visitor from Greece posted Tue November 20, 2007::( | |
| A visitor from Greece posted Tue November 20, 2007: I think that you should be careful on what you are writing. An accident is always a bad thing and you should not fell happy about it... | |
 A visitor from Ireland posted Tue November 20, 2007:Great picture, well done... As for the comment below "That's why boeing is king"... It's a pity that in this person's mind, Boeing (spelt with a capital letter by the way) stands much taller on the debris of other aircraft - The world is big enough for both... Surely the Airbus/Boeing debate should remain light-hearted and encourage excellent aircraft design & healthy competitiveness across the world, not descend into sneering and laughing at other people's mistakes and injuries. It's possible this was an accident caused by 'human error', not the aircraft itself. Any accident that a person can walk away from is the best type, and I for one, wish them a speedy recovery. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: This is good for spare parts, and yes it can be repaired...costly and sad that this happened, someone is being fired for this, be assured! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: A superb "early-retirement" of the A340-600. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: Terrible waste of resources. This a/c is going to be officially written off, but it was insured by Airbus, so Etihad is fine. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: This plane is perhaps the first A340-600 out of service, and at a operating cost of a few million dollars per hour since completition. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: The tail section, four engines, landing gears and perhaps the wingbox are salvageable, the frame itself is definitely a WO. The cockpit is ... AWOL. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Mon November 19, 2007: The light, the drab colouring for what is a very sad sight portrays the mood. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Mon November 19, 2007: Impessive | |
 A visitor from Austria posted Mon November 19, 2007:Way beyound believe | |
 A visitor from Hungary posted Mon November 19, 2007:So sad, I can't believe it. The second accident for A346 this month :(( | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: Etihad would probably get another one. obviously its wasnt their fault...unless they wanted to check the thing by themselves to make sure :) | |
| A visitor from United States posted Mon November 19, 2007: Wow – safety is our number one focus and this looks like someone overlooked a critical detail when testing. My best wishes go out to those who got hurt and to there families. This was a costly check out in many ways; I hope airbus investigates this toughly so to prevent another occurrence. | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Mon November 19, 2007: I've seen something like this in vancouver, an a310 jump the shocks to hit the hanger. if you do a run-up with an airbus air mode you dont have brake, parking brake, reverse and steering, airbus phylosophie you dont need all this if your in the air. mistakes do appen | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Mon November 19, 2007: Bad day for Airbus and Etihad. Power- and beautiful plane destroyed. Any other pictures online or maybe a video? | |
| A visitor from Hungary posted Mon November 19, 2007: Great and amazing. | |
| A visitor from Greece posted Mon November 19, 2007: Our best wishes to those Five persons were injured. | |
 A visitor from India posted Mon November 19, 2007:There is something wrong in this ground run procedure. Normally for full power run ups the airplane is anchored to the ground with steel cables. Just chocks and brakes are not enough. Also during a ground run the blast deflectors are supposed to be behind the engine. This airplane is pointing the wrong way. Obviously there is more to the story. Hope Airbus comes out with a detailed report. | |
| A visitor from Singapore posted Sun November 18, 2007: Gosh!!! It is the Ex-Thai(HS-TNA) Which is the plane model I bought. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sun November 18, 2007: I am not the smartest guy in the world, but I have been an aircraft mechanic for 11 years. Aren't you supposed to do engine runs with the nose AWAY from the blast fence??? | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sun November 18, 2007: Bunch of whiners! Drag it off, cut the damage off, stop drill the cracks, turn it into a mini A340. | |
 A visitor from Portugal posted Sun November 18, 2007:Very good foto | |
| A visitor from Argentina posted Sun November 18, 2007: Indeed more than one must have made a BIG mistake for this to happen. As always, accidents are the sum of thousands of little mishaps. I must say however, the comment saying that this is why Boeing is King is Bullsh.. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Sun November 18, 2007: ^^ Well, Boeing might have better brakes, but Airbus has the better planes :-) | |
 A visitor from Belgium posted Sun November 18, 2007:Thanks for the pic. Get well soon to all injured employees. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Sun November 18, 2007: Truly a shame. thank heavens there were no fatalities | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Sun November 18, 2007: Should have jumped higher!! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sun November 18, 2007: Awesome pic showing what happens when an expensive piece of equipment is left in the hands of idiots! | |
| A visitor from Singapore posted Sun November 18, 2007: Same incident as the Iberia A340-600, which overshot the runway. Both Etihad and Iberia A340-600 are damaged. They have lost against their competitor B777-300ER. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Sun November 18, 2007: I hear a third world airline is interested in purchasing the aircraft now. | |
| A visitor from Israel posted Sat November 17, 2007: First Iberia, then Etihad. Who's next? | |
 A visitor from Malaysia posted Sat November 17, 2007:What a waste! :'( | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat November 17, 2007: What an amazing picture. It sure is a bad month for A340-600s. It really is such a shame to see such a new bird in such horrible shape. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat November 17, 2007: Sad to see it snuffed out before delivery. | |
| A visitor from - posted Sat November 17, 2007: This photo is so much better than any I have seen. Very detailed and able to see clearly where the front of the plane is completely gone. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Sat November 17, 2007: This picture is amazing! I do find it hard to believe that it simply jumped its chocks, though. An engine run-up test should obviously have the brakes set as well, at this picture proves why . . . Something mechanical must have failed with the brakes or a pre-test procedure wasn't followed. | |
 A visitor from Australia posted Sat November 17, 2007:A classic!!!! | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Sat November 17, 2007: Personally I think its still salvageable.....Not!! | |
| A visitor from France posted Sat November 17, 2007: I am still wondering whether the results of a roots analysis will be soon published ! | |
| A visitor from France posted Fri November 16, 2007: I know one of the guys that was on the plane, he's called wango and he's fine. Lucky eh | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: WHAT A WASTE!!! I'm still in shock just looking at the picture that NO ONE was killed. This picture is great in that it so sureal it looks like a model display. Great catch of a not so great moment! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: The three most important things in regard to any aircraft engine-run are, brake pressure, brake pressure, brake pressure. Everything else is optional extras. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Whoops! it's a goodthing there were only injuries that could've been a lot worse. hopefully etihad gets a refund. | |
 A visitor from New Zealand posted Fri November 16, 2007:Oops !! looks like someone had a bad day at the office !! how do you explain that one to the boss ?? | |
 A visitor from Norway posted Fri November 16, 2007:That HAS to be one of the earliest write-offs ever. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: OH NO! What a shame. This makes me slightly suicidal. --Veeshal | |
 A visitor from Turkey posted Fri November 16, 2007:Sad but true... | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Holy.. I thought this bird was a scrap photo on the thumbnail.. Hope the people injured come out okay. All I can say is, good timing. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Oh My God!! scary shot there! | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: This must have been something to see! Wonder if it will show up on You-Tube. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Fri November 16, 2007: Right place right time - for photographer! Sorry for A'Bus and the injured guys, lessons learnt we hope Paul | |
| A visitor from New Zealand posted Fri November 16, 2007: Sad to See A Beautiful Bird Like This In That Condition. Hope Its Not A Complete Writeoff But judgeing By Where the Cockpit Is now who Knows. P.S an Airbus Spokesperson reported that nine on board were injured and one person on the ground so 10 people injured in total. | |
 A visitor from Poland posted Fri November 16, 2007:What a shame to see such a beautiful aircraft in one of the worlds best liveries,destroyed before anyone gets to fly her,airbus have some questions to answer i think | |
| A visitor from Sweden posted Fri November 16, 2007: Nice shot. Very sad cause that's a new bridy | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Ooops! | |
| A visitor from Brazil posted Fri November 16, 2007: Very rare and bizarre accident. Sadly this brand new airliner is a write-off. | |
| A visitor from Mexico posted Fri November 16, 2007: OMG! Very shocking shot. Leaves me speechless. T.B. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: Great shot. Also the first where I can see the front section. In the news of our local radio station they said, that they needed about 8 hours to stop one engine. | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: I guess the engines worked ok. Too bad the chocks didn't. In fact the engines might be one of the few things salvagable from this wreck. Glad there were no fatalities. | |
| A visitor from New Zealand posted Fri November 16, 2007: Such a sad site to see! Rumour has it, that the aircraft is a write-off :( | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: It seems it's on the chopping block to be beheaded... Amazing. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Thats really sad. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: That is a truly sad picture. Such a beautiful plane, and such a sad fate. | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: Ouch, those engines must be mighty powerful to jump the chocks, i wonder who is paying for the damage, and if airbus will give a new a40 to Etihad | |
 A visitor from Taiwan posted Fri November 16, 2007:OMG! a nightmear in Bikini | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: Thx for the photo! I hope Airbus be more careful next time. | |
 A visitor from Finland posted Fri November 16, 2007:Oh my God! Terrible scene! | |
| A visitor from France posted Fri November 16, 2007: November is not a good month for A340-600... | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: What a shame- that plane is f***d! Thank God no fatalities. | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: And I thought that I was having a bad day. | |
| A visitor from India posted Fri November 16, 2007: Heavens!!!! Are you kidding me....That's a brand new plane that was just destroyed. | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Wow!, Such a sad sight to see a brand new plane damaged like that. Looks like it was a pretty violent accident. Hope injuries are minor. | |
| A visitor from Spain posted Fri November 16, 2007: I tnhing is good photo because are a plane crash | |
| A visitor from United States posted Fri November 16, 2007: Sad ending for this A340.I hope no one was seriously injured. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: Superbe photo et rare... On ne voit pas souvant ce genre de scène à Toulouse | |
| A visitor from Switzerland posted Fri November 16, 2007: What a waste of a beautiful bird! | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: Not a good time for A340-600s this week. First Quito and then this | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: Ouch- I hope the insurance will pay | |
 A visitor from Malta posted Fri November 16, 2007:Sad, very sad view, as thats the second accident for an A346 this month :(. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Fri November 16, 2007: A very sad sight. My thoughts go out to the injured workers and their families, may they make a speedy recovery. | |
| A visitor from United Kingdom posted Fri November 16, 2007: My goodness. Crashed even before delivery. Sad view. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: What a pity... that is bad - oh my god, i am really shocked! such a beautiful aircraft destroyed so early :( i hope the 5 injured people are okay! | |
| A visitor from Australia posted Fri November 16, 2007: Great timing of a magnificent machine.i betetihad r really mad now | |
| A visitor from India posted Fri November 16, 2007: Unfortunately i had to rate this picture with 5 stars. Its sad to see this "virgin" beauty banged up like that. In my opinion, the 346 is the most beautiful of the whole Airbus family. But im glad everyone is ok - the lucky 340 crash streak continues. Regards Nitin (India) | |
| A visitor from Ireland posted Fri November 16, 2007: What an impressive view that is! Glad to hear that there are no fatalities. | |
| A visitor from Germany posted Fri November 16, 2007: What a sad sight, an airplane cracked like a nutshell | |
 A visitor from United Arab Emirates posted Fri November 16, 2007:A very bad fortune for A340-600 within few days, this is the second one!!! | |
| A visitor from Canada posted Fri November 16, 2007: Wow first the Iberian Airlines A340 skids off the runway and then this, not a good week for this model line | |
| User photo albums containing this photo [Hide] | Create your own photo album! | |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Photo Copyright © Zubova Marina, all rights reserved. Airliners.net is not affiliated with any entity mentioned or pictured herein.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
