Sponsored Links:
Commercial Flight School, Charter Flights, Model Airplanes, Airport Parking, Cheap Flights, Discount Digital Cameras
Commercial Flight School, Charter Flights, Model Airplanes, Airport Parking, Cheap Flights, Discount Digital Cameras
Picture of the McDonnell Douglas MD-81(UHB) (DC-9-81(UHB)) aircraft
[ Medium Large Fit Screen ]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This photo carries a visible watermark. Why?
[ Medium Large Fit Screen ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Visitor comments (22) [Hide] | Post your own comments by rating the photo above! |
Just a prototype! | |
I'll bet the airlines wish they had these now, with oil prices pushing 140 dollars a barrel! | |
I'll bet the airlines wish they had these now, with oil prices pushing 75 dollars a barrel! | |
I was a small part of that project and we were told that they were't able to get carriers to buy it because oil prices had dropped low enough that the costs of retooling and re-educating the maintenance crews were too high to offset the costs unvolved. It was a great deal more efficient. The core was based on a small fighter jet engine. The double row of fans in the back were counter rotating for balance. It was in-fact louder but not so loud that it couldn't be made to pass noise tests in sensitive areas with some management of the approaches and timing. It was developed in partnership with NASA | |
I think its not used is because the UDF is too noisy. | |
Engineers liked it, but birds vetoed. | |
What hapened to the UDF (unducted fan), why was it never used commercially? please dont tell me, because the passengers did not like the looks of it, it was never used. | |
I think my Aviation professor talked about this in a systems class. If it is, its almost 90% efficient. It was not used because passengers thought it was dangerous. Same reason passangers prefer Turbofan over Turboprop. | |
It's really a funny engine that I never seen. But what is the actual purpose of these small wings attached to it ??? Louis, Hong Kong. | |
The engine looks so strange!!! | |
Looks just great! Thx! | |
Why did they not use it was it inefficient or dangerous or what | |
Effective bypass ratio is about 40:1 ! Blade containment is problematic. | |
I read in a book called "Airplanes of the Future" that this was planned for future planes. The design was suppost to be enviormetal by using prop's and engine. But I'm not sure. It is kind of odd though. | |
I think it's called aft-fan or an aft-duct(fan), or something like that.. | |
Very odd | |
It is an experimental "un-ducted fan" engine. These were supposedly going to be more efficient than traditional jet engines, but numerous concerns kept them from going into production. | |
I remember this aircraft very well. It appears in the book "McDonnell Douglas, a tale of two giants". This engine is an experimental GE turbofan with contrapropellers. Only one of these engines was made. | |
Need an explanation, what kind of engine it is ? | |
They had those GE UDF Aircraft Engines experiments mid 80s... They never got to commercial airliners. | |
It's an unducted fan (UDF), a type of propfan. If memory serves me correct, Air & Space Magazine recently did a full article on this three or four issues ago. I bet wikipedia also has some information, if you're interested. | |
Interesting. What kind of engine is it? | |
| User photo albums containing this photo [Hide] | Create your own photo album! | |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Photo Copyright © Ian Kirby, all rights reserved. Airliners.net is not affiliated with any entity mentioned or pictured herein.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.






Link to me!



















