Search found 7971 matches

by PPVRA
Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:52 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: JetBlue E190 wing spar issues
Replies: 37
Views: 7743

Re: JetBlue E190 wing spar issues

Anyone knows if this is related to the issues Embraer had with Kawasaki Heavy Industries? Or totally separate? https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/embraer-blames-build-quality-and-delivery-issues-for-208542/ It could be related indeed. But these look like they were from after the period that...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:24 am
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: JetBlue E190 wing spar issues
Replies: 37
Views: 7743

Re: JetBlue E190 wing spar issues

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... or-208542/
-->

Anyone knows if this is related to the issues Embraer had with Kawasaki Heavy Industries? Or totally separate?

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... or-208542/

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Sep 01, 2018 4:19 pm
Forum: Travel, Polls & Preferences
Topic: The ecological point of view - Do you look at your ecological footprint when you travel?
Replies: 54
Views: 3182

Re: The ecological point of view

I have never understood why many environmentalists disparage commercial air travel. They are always wanting us to use public transportation. But, isn't that what commercial air travel is? DUH ! ! ! True and in many respects it is less of an impact than other modes. A full 737-800 typically burns ab...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:50 pm
Forum: Travel, Polls & Preferences
Topic: The ecological point of view - Do you look at your ecological footprint when you travel?
Replies: 54
Views: 3182

Re: The ecological point of view

Hub flying is more economical than flying nonstop from everywhere to everywhere. People will often question this because on its surface it doesn’t appear to make any sense given some of the routings with backtracking. But it does make sense. It’s a more complex explanation for sure, but the logic is...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:22 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: EI 757 Runs Over Ramp Agent in PHL?
Replies: 27
Views: 11942

Re: Unconfirmed: EI 757 Runs Over Ramp Agent in PHL?

I know there's going to be a lot of inertia involved with a heavy 757 being pushed back, but surely the stopping distance isn't 'that' much? The ramper must have been quite close to the nose gear when he tripped. The brakes on these airplanes will make them stop abruptly and nearly instantly at tax...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:01 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Is Alitalia unfair competition?
Replies: 19
Views: 3017

Re: Is Alitalia unfair competition?

For the past few years there has been a lot of talk about how the ME3 are unfair competition. Weather the are or not depends on if they are making money and not surviving off money from there states. So I was wondering if Alitalia would be unfair competition then. Alitalia in its 72 year history ha...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:47 pm
Forum: Technical/Operations
Topic: How much will it cost to repair this APU?
Replies: 10
Views: 1488

Re: How much will it cost to repair this APU?

Pour some hot water on that rudder. It’ll pop right out.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:53 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Delta CEO: We beat AA/UA because we have the revenue to sustain it
Replies: 127
Views: 13315

Re: Delta CEO: We beat AA/UA because we have the revenue to sustain it

Lol , re: DL and the C-Series and Boeing using the government to block it .... pot calling the kettle black. Didn’t DL try to use the government to block EK ? DL hypocrisy at its finest ... The real irony is DL hiding behind the Canadian government and its massive subsidy of the DL order. That orde...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:58 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Iran Air is getting 5 ATR72 before sanctions
Replies: 21
Views: 6722

Re: Iran Air is getting 5 ATR72 before sanctions

It’s far less stone age than Saudi, women can vote and don’t have to dress like a mailbox. But they’re not as wealthy as Saudi and their interpretations of Islam is far less violent so they can’t buy as much support from the US. Also, their Government is democratically elected, unlike Saudi. You've...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:03 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Aeroméxico E190 Accident in Durango July 31
Replies: 259
Views: 48087

Re: Aeroméxico E190 Accident in Durango July 31

That definitely looks like wind shear / microburst. Scary stuff.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:42 am
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Airbus and Bombardier Announce CSeries Partnership
Replies: 1568
Views: 181067

Re: Breaking: Airbus and Bombardier Announce C Series Partnership

As a US consumer, I like “dumping”- it makes one aspect of life cheaper, so I can save or spend the money elsewhere. Pity the taxpayer who is making my standard of living better. GF Only if BBD “dumped” the CSeries on Delta’s competitors as well. If not, Delta isn’t going to drop any prices but rat...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 19, 2017 2:50 am
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Airbus and Bombardier Announce CSeries Partnership
Replies: 1568
Views: 181067

Re: Breaking: Airbus and Bombardier Announce C Series Partnership

As a US consumer, I like “dumping”- it makes one aspect of life cheaper, so I can save or spend the money elsewhere. Pity the taxpayer who is making my standard of living better. GF Only if BBD “dumped” the CSeries on Delta’s competitors as well. If not, Delta isn’t going to drop any prices but rat...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 14, 2017 11:39 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Embraer Hopes Pinned on New Scope Clause in 2019-22
Replies: 137
Views: 13575

Re: Embraer Hopes Pinned on New Scope Clause in 2019-22

I think these scope clauses in the current form are stupid. It affects the design of aircraft too much . I disagree. We are in an age where new materials like composites and carbon fiber are being used to make aircraft stronger, lighter, and more fuel efficient than ever. Why the next generation of...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:52 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

This is so fitting.......

Image

Not for me personally, I’m not an expert in anything related to this case.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:44 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

"Obviously" "I doubt" Thanks for your opinions, thats a lot different than facts, such as Ed Bastian saying just a few days ago, "We bought Cseries for the innovation, not the price. " Is that why they bought MD90s and 717s, too? How naive are you? So is that why the b...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 6:29 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Embraer should be happy the duopoly is being threatened. I am sure that going main line might be profitable for them as well There is ZERO chance for a new entrant in the 100-150 seater market with the shenanigans BBD is pulling. This is why I’ve said before that BBD is ultimately hurting innovatio...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 6:26 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Fledgling manufacturer lol BBD is a multi billion dollar conglomerate with decades of experience designing and manufacturing complex products. They don’t need to be coddled. This is only happening because of the possibility of a stretch that MIGHT cause harm to Boeing. The E2 does not have the abil...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 6:06 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Fledgling manufacturer lol

BBD is a multi billion dollar conglomerate with decades of experience designing and manufacturing complex products. They don’t need to be coddled.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 5:35 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Wild thought/question........ if BBD cancels the Delta order, is this whole ordeal over?

Fresh start?

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:35 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Thanks for your opinions, thats a lot different than facts, such as Ed Bastian saying just a few days ago, "We bought Cseries for the innovation, not the price. " Is that why they bought MD90s and 717s, too? Although not directed at me I have to ask, why can't both be correct given the di...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 4:07 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

SteelChair wrote:
that the 787 has never paid development costs (ironic given Boeings position against BBD?


:covereyes:

What on earth makes you think Boeing never paid development costs?

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:49 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

"Obviously" "I doubt" Thanks for your opinions, thats a lot different than facts, such as Ed Bastian saying just a few days ago, "We bought Cseries for the innovation, not the price. " Is that why they bought MD90s and 717s, too? How naive are you? Ah yes, resorting to...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:32 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Why would BBD not provide all requested information? Well it all depends on what information was requested. If information in regards to exactly what rivets were used in what portion of the aircraft (let's add up the price of all the rivets) might make sense right? Only problem is by giving such in...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:17 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

SteelChair wrote:
"Obviously" "I doubt"

Thanks for your opinions, thats a lot different than facts, such as Ed Bastian saying just a few days ago, "We bought Cseries for the innovation, not the price. "


Is that why they bought MD90s and 717s, too?

How naive are you?

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:50 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Please tell us what you know about the discussions you heard in Delta's boardroom, with your own ears, about what their first choice was. Anything else is just speculation. Delta's own press releases, actually. Edit: Found it: http://news.delta.com/embraer-190s-more-boeing-737-900ers-coming-delta S...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:24 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Please tell us what you know about the discussions you heard in Delta's boardroom, with your own ears, about what their first choice was. Anything else is just speculation. Delta's own press releases, actually. Edit: Found it: http://news.delta.com/embraer-190s-more-boeing-737-900ers-coming-delta

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:19 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Yep you are right. The Bombardier Delta deal is all about Delta buying the only available airplane in its class, the only one that is the right size for its needs, and a very revolutionary plane at that. All the rest is just noise. Mind you, the CSeries wasn't Delta's first choice. Not until Canada...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:51 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Again, there is no "dumping." There is program accounting earning early customers through discounts for a revolutionary, game changing, all-new jet. Just like Boeing did with the 787. Delta said they didn't buy it because of the price, but because of the innovation. BBD doesn't use progra...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:40 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

I mean, instead of going into a trade war you are not going to win, how about selling some cheap bodies elsewhere in the world? The whole point was to get a large, globally visible and highly reputable operator to order the type. Delta fit the bill perfectly and they were looking for a 100 seater a...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:16 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Confirmed: Austral will replace their E-190 with 737s
Replies: 28
Views: 4484

Re: E190's on the way out at Austral?

This order by Austral has been suspect since day 1 of political meddling in Argentina and in Brazil. It likely wasn’t the right airplane for their needs from the start, so it isn’t surprising they might be looking to upgauge.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:07 am
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Delta: C-Series What's Next
Replies: 246
Views: 35315

Re: Delta: C-Series What's Next

Bottom line, If BBD can't sustain that airplane price they gave Delta for EVERYBODY?? Then Delta shouldn't get that price because the sold it under cost. This is getting into another issue that's already been debated ad nauseam, but every manufacturer sells some frames below cost. The early custome...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:23 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Future of Bombardier Commercial Aerospace?
Replies: 35
Views: 6152

Re: Future of Bombardier Commercial Aerospace?

The C-Series IS a trend-setter and game-changer, hence why it is such a bothersome pain in the butt to Boeing. Without the CSeries, there would have been no A320NEO. Without the A320NEO, there would have been no 737MAX. The CSeries may be losing out in the battle, due to the inherent difficulties o...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:27 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

FYI, ALL of the C-Series competitors use American-made engines. And of course, many other systems, too. That economic argument is practically moot because a loss for the C-Series is a gain for a slightly different version of the same engine. Probably made at the same factory, too. Fact-check while ...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 07, 2017 8:59 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

So Bombardier goes bankrupt and sells itself off to China who ships it all home. We won't tangle with China, and they will sell it cheaper than Canada would. Way to Go! Presumably, BBD and the Canadian government would seek the highest bidder. Maybe it's China, but would the Chinese sell the airpla...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:40 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Embraer Hopes Pinned on New Scope Clause in 2019-22
Replies: 137
Views: 13575

Re: Embraer Hopes Pinned on New Scope Clause in 2019-22

The pay rate for 100 seat aircraft exist at all 3 majors the pilots have done their part. It's the company that doesn't want to play ball. It's real easy to get 76/70/50 seat pay rates just use the negotiated sliding scale. The ball is in the companies court they have the tools. There's a very big ...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:28 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

SheikhDjibouti, The C-100 might burn less fuel than the E195E2, but it costs $14 million more per airplane. It might be more efficient on a fuel basis, but that's not the only metric that matters. It could be uneconomical because its cost of production is too high. And/or maintenance, for example. I...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:23 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: Tap Portugal eyes potential A340 replacement
Replies: 67
Views: 11499

Re: Tap Portugal eyes potential A340 replacement

So what about hot/high performance? I suppose the A330 would take a payload hit on some Brazilian routes, like LIS-CNF and LIS-GRU. If the NEO is not an issue, TAP operates just 4 A340s and have plenty A330neo incoming. I am wondering what is hard about these routes. I see LIS-CNF is 4609mi and LIS...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:50 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

FYI,

ALL of the C-Series competitors use American-made engines. And of course, many other systems, too.

That economic argument is practically moot because a loss for the C-Series is a gain for a slightly different version of the same engine. Probably made at the same factory, too.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:59 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Like I said earlier, a subsidy isn’t defined by whether the government makes money or not. If they paid 35 cents on the dollar but the real value was 25 cents on the dollar, they still over paid, regardless of what they sell it for. If my government would pay X for a stake in a company (for whateve...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:02 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

And yet, US carriers have purchased legions of CRJs. I don't think you can liken this (capital good) to a commodity import issue. For sure, as it did not hurt any US businesses (was actually a benefit compared to the competition). By example, the CF-34s were made in Connecticut (as opposed to RR eq...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:19 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

The CSeries program HAS TO BE SOLD (at market value) to a jurisdiction that can make good use of its technology, has a sufficient domestic market So you want to submit to blackmail. MAGA ~== bullying works. me seemeth. and is not vulnerable to bullying tactics. China? That would give the C-Series a...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:08 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

It makes no difference if a profit is eventually made, because a subsidy isn't defined by whether it makes a loss to the government. If Quebec over-paid for that stake, then that's just another way to hide a cash infusion. If a profit is made, then it would be hard to argue they overpaid . . . Like...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:05 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

I was referring only to the equity portion of the subsidy, which is what your post was referring to. Not the other subsidies much less other programs. The $1B equity investment (for a 49.5% stake) is calculated as the elephant in the room for the US. (FWIW, the Airbus talks that occurred a few week...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:32 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

It makes no difference if a profit is eventually made, because a subsidy isn't defined by whether it makes a loss to the government. If Quebec over-paid for that stake, then that's just another way to hide a cash infusion. I'd go after your elected politician's head if they gifted cash to a large c...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Wed Oct 04, 2017 3:35 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

If Quebec sells its 49.5% stake in the CSeries program at MARKET VALUE (like to COMAC), then the ITC assumption that the $1B investment was a 100% "subsidy" should logically disappear/become irrelevant. Since the time Quebec $1B invested (then only paying like 35 cents on the dollar), bot...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:22 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

The aviation industry is subsidized globally. Welcome to 21st century global business. Over the last 100 years, industry has grown to be less subsidized, not more. If you truly cared about free trade you'd be arguing against subsidies, for subsidies are not compatible with free trade. Subsidy wars ...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:28 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Articles elsewhere show BBD absolutely took a loss on the sale. "Bombardier’s task is not made easier by an outbreak of transparency in the secretive jet market after it was forced by Canadian accounting rules to take a $500 million charge for the Delta deal and two others covering a total of ...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Tue Oct 03, 2017 2:56 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

northstardc4m wrote:
Well if you accept the assumptions that:

Bombardier was at the time taking a loss as well


During the UAL deal? Please post a link to the source. I'm pretty sure that deal was when BBD still thought they didn't have to offer any discounts, because their plane was just that good.

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Tue Oct 03, 2017 12:46 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

Frankly, "dumping" shouldn't matter--if Canadian taxpayers are willing to subsidize Delta and its passengers, good for the passengers. THAT kind of dumping does matter, because winning a competitive bid for your aircraft effectively through externalizing the costs associated with the extr...

Jump to post
by PPVRA
Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:42 pm
Forum: Civil Aviation
Topic: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier
Replies: 1424
Views: 97563

Re: U.S. Dept of Commerce backs Boeing in dispute with Bombardier

The Boeing-UAL deal is quite different than the BBD-Delta deal. Boeing took the hit themselves, BBD used government money to dodge the financial hit. This is completely different.

Jump to post