Noshow wrote:Could it be possible that polar survival equipment and special crew qualification are required for extremely northerly routes?
we used to do this in the MD-11 and because the nose wheel is 20' behind the pilots we would actually be over the grass before making the turn around. We would turn from centerline 45 deg
Jump to postIn the MD-11 if we were ferrying they put concrete pallets in the cargo section
Jump to postJust saying, if those pilots who work for a US major dug into their contracts, then there is probably a section on basing pilots outside of the contiguous US. I know at NW the agreement involved a living allowance premium for that exception and was applied to bases in ANC, HNL and GUM. Of course th...
Jump to postI was always told from my flight Safety classes many many years a go the the US. uses 18,000' because it's half the atmosphere=500mb. When I went to the airlines I don't remember them saying much except the separate levels in Europe and other places. The oddest was Almaty, KZ where you descended on...
Jump to postI was told my a PP buddy in UK that they do QFE if they stay local
Jump to postI was always told from my flight Safety classes many many years a go the the US. uses 18,000' because it's half the atmosphere=500mb. When I went to the airlines I don't remember them saying much except the separate levels in Europe and other places. The oddest was Almaty, KZ where you descended on ...
Jump to postAn amusing story, I was flying Bangalore to Mumbai. The weather in Mumbai was very bad with torrential rain and low vis. We made two approaches and even with the HUD saw nothing. We announced our intent to go to our alt. which was Hyderabad and headed that way. When we landed the first thing ground ...
Jump to postIt didn't as long as I had it. It was late 40s I best I remember. It was stock, with original a/s ind. I sold it to another co. pilot that took it to ANC and put a bigger engine and balloon tires on it and made it a bush plane. Not sure if he put an electrical system in, somehow I doubt it.
Jump to postIt didn't as long as I had it. It was late 40s I best I remember. It was stock, with original a/s ind. I sold it to another co. pilot that took it to ANC and put a bigger engine and balloon tires on it and made it a bush plane. Not sure if he put an electrical system in, somehow I doubt it.
Jump to postAsa side note the C-150s always had radios but after that most airplanes came out of the factory with no radios. That was left up to the buyer. We would often have a portable VHF radio with us.
Jump to postWoodreau wrote:CosmicCruiser wrote:A J-3 with a radio? Mine didn't even have a battery! LOL
That would be time for Light gun. Lol
all I’d remember is green good red bad.
A J-3 with a radio? Mine didn't even have a battery! LOL
Jump to postI got my private license at Lawton in '68 when I won the powered flight encampment as a cadet in the CAP. Seems the old fellow who gave me my checkride was a Mr. Grigsby. He had something like a 4 or 5 digit license number!! There were about 20 of us from squadrons all over the country. We were take...
Jump to postEven with all the haze and smoke I don't remember doing a CATIII landing. I do remember doing CATII landings but the HUD with EFVS made a big difference. I remember looking around the HUD to see what the F/O saw and it was totally brown. Through the HUD I saw a road, the app. lights and the runway.
Jump to postThey're not uncommon. So common, in fact, that the A350 has auto-TCAS as standard and the A330 as an option. The A350 even has auto-TCAS during an automated emergency descent. As for how many events a year, I don't really know. I've seen TAs but not an RA yet. One more reason to watch your climb/de...
Jump to postWell,I certainly don't want to get in an argument. It's not worth it. I won't print what I remember as fact because it has been a while but the major change after Narita was that you'll never try to salvage a hard landing. The call was go around and it didn't matter if you were at mins or bouncing o...
Jump to postI don't remember the co. making a special designation about it. A hard landing you go around. Pitch +7deg max pwr and hold it. This came about after Narita. I think the proper call out was go around and not rejected landing. I thought Boeing revised their procedures after the EK accident in DXB. I ...
Jump to postThat's standard procedure nowadays to Go Around after a hard landing and not try to salvage the landing. Prudent decision. Isnt it called a rejected landing not a go around ? I don't remember the co. making a special designation about it. A hard landing you go around. Pitch +7deg max pwr and hold i...
Jump to postCorrect
. I got to do it a couple of times. Just saying you're not staying in the country's boundaries when you t/o & land. wasn't a biggy.
That's standard procedure nowadays to Go Around after a hard landing and not try to salvage the landing. Prudent decision.
Jump to postAt least where I was everything changed after 9/11. No tours except VIP arranged tours and as I was told here no longer are ARTCC nor towers tours available. If that's changed I don't know it.
Jump to postThe first EVS appeared on the fedex fleet around 2011/2012, on a MD11 if I remember well. Then suddenly, the whole fleet started to be retrofitted, except Airbuses. I was kind of shocked as it happened at a time when we, on the ramp, were asking for proper gloves and more ramp snakes for bulk ops, ...
Jump to postThere were guys that would bid RFO to make it easy then complain to the capt they were coming up on their 3 & 3. Then there was the issue of "hey man you knew this so why did you bid RFO? Ugly.
Jump to postI would say you would log the hours as a crewmember but probably won't get credit for a landing.
Jump to postWe never went as far as robes and PJs. Sweat pants and a sweat shirt was typical.
Jump to postI guess what I'm not understanding is the time tables to certain altitudes. From, at least what we were taught, 51 min to 10,000'? That's hardly an emerg. descent. For us it was idle pwr, full speedbrakes and red line. It better not take 51 min or you will bust the chk ride. So what emerg. descent ...
Jump to postI guess what I'm not understanding is the time tables to certain altitudes. From, at least what we were taught, 51 min to 10,000'? That's hardly an emerg. descent. For us it was idle pwr, full speedbrakes and red line. It better not take 51 min or you will bust the chk ride. So what emerg. descent a...
Jump to post5 Miles Out.....Mike Oldfield....There's a Be-18 (or Lockheed 10) on the cover High Flying Bird.....Zephyr Traveling Band.....Creedence Clearwater Revival...."737 coming out of the sky, take me down to Memphis on a midnight ride Teterboro Tower.......Arthur Godfrey.....1950s. He was a pilot as ...
Jump to postDumb question - but to cargo aircraft have escape slides on the L1 door, or to they just use a rope for the crew to evacuate? Don't know the answer to that, but they were actually taken off the aircraft by firefighters using ladders. Just saw a video a few minutes ago of them coming out.[/quote Car...
Jump to post.... Probably part of the reason a lot of flights go around the Himalayas. Also explains better something I never quite understood - why flying "The Hump" to China was so dangerous in WW2. Max cruising level for a laden WW2 planes was in the mid-20's; if you hit a strong up/down draft off...
Jump to postObviously there's extremes on both sides. I flew with a Capt. on the 727 many years ago who wouldn't turn on the thunderstorm lights in cruise and forbid any reading. every leg in the middle of the night was horrible. Then on the other end, I came up front from my rest period, MD-11, to find the F/O...
Jump to postStarlionblue wrote:CosmicCruiser wrote:Not only is it company specific but where I was they changed on a regular basis.
Yep. This always adds some spice to sim and line checks.![]()
![]()
Not only is it company specific but where I was they changed on a regular basis.
Jump to postIf I remember correctly, and anyone feel free to correct me, the MD-11 had something similar. The software update was done before I went to the jet but it had to do with LSAS trimming nose down at a given point in the flare to prevent tail strikes. guys told me something about the nose continuing up...
Jump to postAs for choosing a field I would have to say it's as always easy to be a Monday morning quarterback, as we say. They had just had a horrible experience that left them with cracked windshields and a double engine failure. Time did not slowdown and I must admit if I had seen the terrain as I came out o...
Jump to postFrom where I was, guys tell me that there are not many long layovers anymore and trips are constantly revised.
Jump to postGood catch. My mind just saw kts.
Jump to postIt's been a while since I was in either of the jets but I don't remember the MD-11 being 20-30kts faster than the DC-10 at the same wgt. . Remember that the -11 had higher landing weights so that accounts for some increase. Other than that what someone posted about the smaller horizontal stab is tru...
Jump to postWe used reverse in the DC-10 always unless there were restrictions
Jump to post3.2.2.1 An air carrier’s line operations policy should permit and encourage MFO and should incorporate the following: 1. Encouragement to manually fly the aircraft when conditions permit, including, at least periodically, the entire departure and arrival phases and potentially the entire flight, if...
Jump to postThe Vapp at max ldg wgt was 168kts. Got to see it a few times. Better have your ldg data correct.
Jump to postGalaxyFlyer wrote:CosmicCruiser wrote:The Saberliner didn't have wing anti ice initially but you could get ice.
I only flew the Sabre 65 with the wing that heard ice was in the area would stall. We turned on the WAI lots after the two crashes.
The Saberliner didn't have wing anti ice initially but you could get ice.
Jump to postStarlionblue wrote:As an aside, would you really be looking at the fuel flow 10 knots before V1?