On my Mac it does not seem.
But I do not want to argue
Ok thanks for the explanation of common.
For the TB20, I sincerely do not see where it can be blurry. But maybe you have tools that we will not have to do this check.
I'm sorry to have mistaken with the expression "double". However what does common mean (beyond the underexposed that my histogram did not report)?
Regarding the TB20 as it can be out of focus frankly it only sees the screenr.
But it does nothing.
Hi everyone I had two rejected for the same shot with two different reasons. The first because according to the sceener I should have indicated as airline rather than private, untitled. The second because, the exact same photo, I repeat, would be Blurry - Quality This is demeaning. Also, a few days ...Jump to post
Goodmorning everyone Preliminarily I apologize if these my questions have already been answered. Today I had rejected this photograph https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/6/4/5409469.jpg?v=v4c601ddbe61 with the following reasons: - CW Rotation - Dirty - Personal Message ("upper righ...Jump to post
Hello Today I was this rejection: "distance". Photo id 5391851 In the email the screener wrote: "I'm sorry that this was not mentioned before". What does this mean? Previously of what? In addition, the photo does not suffer at all from "distance". I write this because i...Jump to post
hi I point out that the photo notice mails accepted or rejected are not sent regularly. Sometimes they arrive incomplete (example two accepted yes, but those rejected nothing). Today, for example, the mail of two accepted and two rejected has not arrived and this for others too. Sorry for my bad eng...Jump to post
hello dear administrators Let me know if you can put in my web portal your aircraft search system and then use it to let users add a photo. The web portal is being developed and would be used only by members of Plane Spotters Bari Group. Obviously your credits will be included. Thanks and sorry for ...Jump to post