Hi
It's in the database as a new registration. The screening log showed no one had depriorized it. It may have been a system error you saw.
Merry Christmas
Hi
Appears the image was added and builder field on its own is not usually a rejection.
Regards
Hi
No pictures from Associated Press or anywhere else, you have to take the pictures you upload.
Hi All
Images have started to index and for each of you who shared the ID numbers you should be able to view them now.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
Thanks for the ID numbers. Unfortunately this is taking longer than expected to resolve. If your images do not appear we shall offer priority uploads and apologies for the inconvenience.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
Some accepted images are not appearing in the DB. We are looking into the issue and hope to have it resolved shortly.
Please leave an ID number if you have been affected.
Regards
Paul
Hi Wiggy
You had some nice weather and hope to see some shots
Hi
It's still allowed thought the cost is closer to $1,240 an hour plus $80 landing fee. Chief pilot is still there and Brett is also very good.
Regards
Paul
Hi Hadleigh In the morning Shep's Mound would be best as the light is behind you and most of the traffic for 16L/34R will taxi past very close. Depending on which runways are in use in the afternoon and the type of shot you would like either the beach carpark or staff carpark are good vantage points...
Jump to postHello DuthSpotter1
Thanks for giving the crew time to have a look.
They believe one shot is fine and the other suffers more from contrast than an overexposed sky. A reupload will be asked for.
Regards
Paul
Hi All
We undertook some server maintenance and as you noted it is an indexing issue. Please allow a few hours for the indexing to complete and all your images will again display. You can still see them in the accepted tab in your photo corner.
Regards
Paul
Hello B77L
Thanks for your feedback and there's no excuse other than mistakes sometimes happen.
Regards
Paul
Hello
You will find the reupload link next to your images under accepted in the Photo Corner
https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-corner
Regards
Hello Nigel
This bug happens occasionally please upload the image again and mark it priority screening with a note
Regards
Paul
Hi DutchSpotter1
The motive appears different
Regards
Hi Dutchspotter1
They're screened individually though the team are able to decide how many they view i.e. 5, 10, 20 or more. How many are chosen is a batch.
Regards
Paul
Hi Dutchspotter1
No, we've not changed our policy. Nor would we and these were screened same batch so an error was made. We have asked the photographer to correct and reupload.
Regards
Paul
Hello N94504 It has always been defined as show days as long as we've had the acceptance guide. That said, new registrations and liveries arriving early for shows qualify for those reasons and there have been times when some arrivals from the major manufacturer's or military formations have been giv...
Jump to postHello Dutchspotter1
Thanks for your post and we agree with your point of view, accept we have made an error and the one with the lowest views will be removed.
Regards
Paul
Hello Wiggy
I've replied to your email
Regards
Paul
Hello Mark Thank you for your feedback. The degree of discretion depends on the newsworthy nature of the shot and amount of photographer's uploading it. There are too many variables to list and as for RIAT and Singapore we would be happy to add if community wants. The above text is now live in the a...
Jump to postHello Chris
Unfortunately it had to be removed fpr editing as it was two images overlayed into one
Hello Galderson
Sure please use [email protected]
Regards
Paul
Hello All This is the text for the update with the amendment suggested by Cary, It shall be the exact same text in the acceptance guide and priority upload URL https://www.airliners.net/photo-upload/upload The following subjects will be given priority screening and will qualify for a News Banner on ...
Jump to postHello Dutchspotter1
There is enough aviation motive without any aircraft for acceptance. You noted runways are acceptable and some of the more remote ones have very little aviation motive but they have good database value and are acceptable.
Regards
Paul
Hello Cary Thank you for your feedback and input. Your point on screener discretion is noted and to be fair we fully understand. The example you highlight is valid and we shall do our best to avoid such situations moving forward. https://www.airliners.net/photo-upload/upload The above update from la...
Jump to postHello Cary, All The team has discussed the points made in relation to stickers and decals and they would like them specifically mentioned and propose amending point 3 as follows; No stickers or decals of any kind. Screener discretion will apply if the markings are for an airline's anniversary. Pleas...
Jump to postHello Rutger
With this update, yes, though screener discretion applies in relation to the crop
Regards
Paul
Hello Cary Thank you for your feedback and you do make some good points. We are extending how long we will keep this topic open as the entire screening team are discussing some of the points you've made and considering an amendment. If anyone else would like to raise some points please feel free to ...
Jump to postHi
Chris is right there are many to choose from and I'll add this one which is amazing
Hello Galderson
Can you please send a couple of these via email so we can take a look?
Thanks and regards
Paul
Hello NoTaxOnRotax Understand your point and the shot you refer to the motive works well. In previous years we have accepted similar shots where the cherry blossoms take more of the frame than the aircraft. In relation to your shots and their motive I do understand your concerns. That said, I do see...
Jump to postHello
I see an email from you notaxonratax and will reply shortly
Regards
Paul
Hello ASOSpotter It is unfortunate your image is being misused and as CPD noted you should deal with LinkedIn. We also advise use of a watermark to prevent this from happening. The owners do not hold copyright of your images. You do and we are not able to file a complaint with LinkedIn on your behal...
Jump to postHello Rainer
To clarify, I mean the priority screening team has discretion to add an image with decals if they believe it warrants acceptance due to news coverage or similar.
Regards
Paul
Hello Rainer
Understand they're quite large and the priority team do have screener discretion if required.
Regards
Paul
Hello Rainer
It's a decal and only full livery changes receive priority
Regards
Paul
Hi Rainer
Unfortunately the double rule only allows 1 image for the same side. It does appear to be a harsh rejection but that is how the rules have been for a very long time. That said, as the motives are vastly different I am of the opinion it should not be double.
Regards
Paul
Hi
The whole frame looks slightly OS. It's great quality and if you'd like to try again with a little less USM I'm sure it would be an IA
Regards
Hello
The screener suggested a smaller size such as 1024. It is also right in frame which explains distance. Soft is subjective as it may depend on the screener but a little more USM would help.
If you are able to correct please try again and happy to look at it if you'd like
Regards
Hi
Check against the horizontals to and it was also dirty, oversharpened with low contrast
Regards
Hi
You can submit a correct as historical is defined as vintage and by date.
611381 Yes I've seen it in the glider category. Here is one I found though there's another who mounts the camera on the wing for cockpit shots and he is from Canada. Note they don't appear to be film cameras like you are asking but if you use the contact link maybe you can DM them and ask for some ...
Jump to postHello
Yes, we can do that for you. If you email support we will assist you in doing that.
Paul
Community Manager
Hello All
Please note appeal and some screening emails are currently not being generated. We do not expect it to last for long and it's better to communicate the issue for the community.
Paul
Community Manager.
Hello All VerticalScope are currently changing the crew email accounts and this is causing some disruptions which may explain why you've not received a reply or automated email since yesterday. We regret the inconvenience caused and ask your patience until VS complete the task. The crew also need ti...
Jump to postHello NPeterman Agree we will thrive with updated rules in the acceptance guide for priority screening. Yes a member of Boneyard Safari was a screener and withheld it from the team and owners. There's a lot more than said and that group is better suited to low quality community standard social media...
Jump to post