Look at the details on the Saab. Look at the registration, the lines below it, the exhaust pipe of the engines, wheels, windows, etc. All of those show thin light halos and jagged edges. That is the oversharpening. Now compare that with the LH and with the Iraqi. If you see all three the same, maybe...Jump to post
NwaAviator wrote:I think so, looking at fr24 and saw a shot that was cropped horribly with one wing totally missing with the top of the fuselage. I guess it just depends on the screener.
It is indeed too blurry and was accepted by mistake. The photographer has been notified already and the shot will be removed.
I have to agree that the angle and the motive are great, but in this case the quality just isn't there.
I can't update my email address. I realised I wasn't getting screener emails today so I checked and my email address for some reason was one I have not used in a decade and know I've changed... Tried to change it, but when I do the email confirmation I get a 404 error. Missed screener email because...Jump to post
In terminal 1 I would recommend the area around gate A28 and the new Z pier (gates A50 - A69) if you are in the Schengen area. From there the only option to get to the viewing deck is to go landside and take the bus to terminal 2 as the skylink train is closed at the moment.Jump to post
Unification / Standarization of duplicated entries is high on the priority list, but at this point is just not possible for the editors to do such batch processing. As soon as the tools are ready - no idea when - I am sure they will clean up duplicates as quickly as possible.
Was a mistake by the screener that handled the appeal. Ticked the wrong box. Should have been "Underexposed" instead of "Personal Message".
All the best,
Do you really see no difference in the lower-left corner of these two photos?? https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/7/7/5320777.jpg?v=v454bae02442 https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/6/2/5116263.jpg?v=v404ef7d8c12 Go ahead, open them in two browser tabs and switch between th...Jump to post
Canon cameras (I guess Nikon too, but don't know for sure) apply some amount of sharpening in-camera to the RAW images. It varies from barely appreciable in some models to really disturibing in others (6D). Luckily it is one of the parameters of what Canon calls "Picture Style" so you can ...Jump to post
Could be to wait if they had to be in a certain point at a certain time and were too early. Just a guess.Jump to post
Agree to what DL747 says, please keep all your requests in one topic. My take, only about cropping and motives. 1. Point of attention is the waving pilot, this is a Motive rejection. From the Acceptance guide : "Close up cockpit shots with the only reason for the shot being showing pilots wavin...Jump to post
You can also get runway facing rooms at the Premier Inn T4 , but very much like in the Renaissance, you will be shooting through several layers of glass, so basically forget night shots there. Having such a room might come in handy if the weather during the day is poor, though. Some daylight shots f...Jump to post
Nice copyright bar by the same guy:-P http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/Boeing-737-332/2779353/L During the site migration, some photos suffered from copyright bar duplication. We will ask for this one to be re-processed so one of them is removed. Absolutely nothing to do with the user, if yo...Jump to post
The "field" remark means that when uploading photos of Boeing and Airbus aircraft (among others) you should avoid sending any "Builder" data, as it only applies for license-built aircraft. So, when you enter the registration and airport on the photo upload page, and click on Auto...Jump to post