I would really like to avoid having the screening team decide about PCs or even what is PC eligible and what is not. As JK said above, that is opening the well known favoritism can of worms. If the system is apparently not working perfectly fine with a large number of photographers being able to vot...Jump to post
I cannot speak for what happened seven years ago, but I can tell that Withheld is a valid location nowadays. It is better if you could give the real location, but we also understand that some military movements cannot be disclosed, and thus the usage of Withheld is allowed.
Adding to Kas's response, the mk2 version of the 100-400 is noticeably sharper, mostly so on long focal lengths (300 to 400mm) and wide(r) apertures. It works very very nicely with the 5DIV. Question - just to add fuel to the fire - have you considered going mirrorless? Either with the EOS R or with...Jump to post
Whenever something is not clear, it is always a good idea to review the acceptance guide. Here the section about Personal Message:
Thanks for the real world review Karl. Much appreciatedJump to post
aircountry wrote:Yes I found another one same plane on later date at Sydney from JPhotos and its real, no joke, fake or clone. See this https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9506494
What do you mean? I can see them as JPG. This is what I do. - Open the large version of an image. As a self-plug, https://www.airliners.net/photo/Wideroe/Embraer-190-E2-STD-ERJ-190-300STD/5765695/L - Right click on the image, then "Copy Image Address". - Click on the URL bar on your browse...Jump to post
real or fake photo? Look up at upper level last left door with big double windows. All A380 dont have double window only one small window on each door. see this 5730829 Maybe the screener didnt see it before accept it. It already accept it few days ago. I have never considered the possibility of cl...Jump to post
Photos are sorted only by views. If Russian military aircraft get more views than other types they will get to the front page. No bias, just what the users like and click.Jump to post
Look at the details on the Saab. Look at the registration, the lines below it, the exhaust pipe of the engines, wheels, windows, etc. All of those show thin light halos and jagged edges. That is the oversharpening. Now compare that with the LH and with the Iraqi. If you see all three the same, maybe...Jump to post
NwaAviator wrote:I think so, looking at fr24 and saw a shot that was cropped horribly with one wing totally missing with the top of the fuselage. I guess it just depends on the screener.
It is indeed too blurry and was accepted by mistake. The photographer has been notified already and the shot will be removed.
I have to agree that the angle and the motive are great, but in this case the quality just isn't there.
I can't update my email address. I realised I wasn't getting screener emails today so I checked and my email address for some reason was one I have not used in a decade and know I've changed... Tried to change it, but when I do the email confirmation I get a 404 error. Missed screener email because...Jump to post
In terminal 1 I would recommend the area around gate A28 and the new Z pier (gates A50 - A69) if you are in the Schengen area. From there the only option to get to the viewing deck is to go landside and take the bus to terminal 2 as the skylink train is closed at the moment.Jump to post
Unification / Standarization of duplicated entries is high on the priority list, but at this point is just not possible for the editors to do such batch processing. As soon as the tools are ready - no idea when - I am sure they will clean up duplicates as quickly as possible.
Was a mistake by the screener that handled the appeal. Ticked the wrong box. Should have been "Underexposed" instead of "Personal Message".
All the best,
Do you really see no difference in the lower-left corner of these two photos?? https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/7/7/5320777.jpg?v=v454bae02442 https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/6/2/5116263.jpg?v=v404ef7d8c12 Go ahead, open them in two browser tabs and switch between th...Jump to post
Canon cameras (I guess Nikon too, but don't know for sure) apply some amount of sharpening in-camera to the RAW images. It varies from barely appreciable in some models to really disturibing in others (6D). Luckily it is one of the parameters of what Canon calls "Picture Style" so you can ...Jump to post
Could be to wait if they had to be in a certain point at a certain time and were too early. Just a guess.Jump to post
Agree to what DL747 says, please keep all your requests in one topic. My take, only about cropping and motives. 1. Point of attention is the waving pilot, this is a Motive rejection. From the Acceptance guide : "Close up cockpit shots with the only reason for the shot being showing pilots wavin...Jump to post