Dear head screener, regard this pic and its rejection... http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/2/6/4425627.jpg?v=v46bfcaa3d02 2017-06-20 05:27 AM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2017-07-04 07:42 AM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected Soft High in Frame Underexposed 2017-07-04 11:50 AM ...Jump to post
Just a personal guess, but might it be that the Screeners first check for the obvious flaws (centering, leveling, dirt spots), and then, if all that is ok, go into contrast, exposure, sharpness and so on? That would explain having a rejection for Leveling, and then once that's fixed, having it reje...Jump to post
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/1/2/4403213.jpg?v=v4944bdcba2a This is the story of one of my pic rej ... 2017-05-23 10:47 AM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2017-06-03 08:10 AM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected CW Rotation 2017-06-03 08:55 AM : Appealed by photographer ricox ...Jump to post
spompert wrote:Nice photo, good to see it on the frontpage!
Thank's, cargo is uploaded succefully, imho is a bit overexp but .... Now my qustion is for this particular situation, an hely crashed (without injuries) I could take photos only in distance of the rescue .. is possible to use this kind of composition? http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5...Jump to post
Hi guys, I had this http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/5/9/4330951.jpg?v=v4048b7d71f3 rej for: Banding Vignetting UnderExp After a deeply analisys on the works, equalizing limage level I could not find Band, but, this morning on teh site, moving up and down the pic on my screen I saw ....Jump to post
Hi all, this photo have a story: http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/2/0/4320021.jpg?v=v4668964077f was rej 2 times only for Cyan... today after two fix is become: Blurry Overexposed Soft High Contrast Noise is not the first time that I wrote about this scr behavieur, If you rej a pic wi...Jump to post
Hi staff, probably I'm not so smart but this morning I was looking for upload queue limits table and I had some difficulties to find it. I purpose to make this information: Images in DB: 1-5: 2 5-10: 5 10-100: 10 100-500: 15 500-1000: 20 >1000: 40 easily accessible? Do you agree? I noticed also anot...Jump to post
Hi guy, both this images was rej for overshapening, after appeal rej motivation grew up and head say that is possible that my lens have a problem ... I'm quite warried .. what kind of problem could have my EF 100-400 IS II??? http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/9/8/4314893.jpg?v=v46aad44...Jump to post
Regarding my two last rej, I explicity asked in the appeal to indicate me where signaled issue are eventually visibile ... Head rej without any explanation, adding more questionable issue. Very arrogant and opinionated behavieur. Uploading and also discussing on photos composition and quality was a ...Jump to post
I don't understand If developers/designers of this site have any problems... Since site was changed, one of the usual critics is the unused space in display photo info, forum thread etc etc, now after months of waiting, they come out with photo statistic table exactly in the same way!!! 10cm of unus...Jump to post
but onestly, I repeat and repeatr that your way to screen have to be more standard,
this my https://www.airliners.net/photo/Alitalia ... /3915049/L few weeks ago was accepted... not right in frame .. but is the same crop and angle
... so I want to ask if is really heathaze visible to decide if put it in the trash or not...
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 970a08c3ec
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4cf537ef97 2016-09-20 12:15 PM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2016-09-30 11:43 PM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected Oversharpened Quality Noise 2016-10-01 01:40 AM : Appealed by photographer ricox Photographer Comment: Quality not different from thi...Jump to post
Hi to all, I need an opinion, this pic: http://www.airliners.net/user/photo-cor ... to/3983111 was rej for oversharpening, I appeal, and head say OK OK sharpening is OK but ... neen CW rotation, I check and re-check but I'm sure that ground is perfeclly levelled... and now? I have to do like some fr...Jump to post
Dear staff, it's a lot of monts since site was been "updated" :? . It's sad for me to see that this site, for photograper, had lost a lot of enjo :| y... I continue uploading here to don't lost a lot of work and in the hope that something change. For example, Photo statistic and Upload que...Jump to post
Sorry, in this my pics:
https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837401/L
https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837379/L
there is no copyright bar ...
I come back from my holidays, only for opinion, this was the pic:
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 907683.jpg
On August 15th I had this pic
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Emirates ... 61/3917393
usually with this kind of pic I easily reach 1000 views, today I see a few more of 100???
...So what is the other flaw for which it was rejected? In this pic, as all other, I adjusted the shadows, and I got this: "Your image of I-TALY shows evidence of darkening/altering the sky which is prohibited editing and will lead to an upload suspension if repeated" let me say that when...Jump to post
I appealed a photo of I-TALY, I ask about category in this forum and a screener say to me GOV not MILITARY, now in appeal HS say MIL not GOV hey guys are we jocking?? Pheraps yes... I also took a Yellow ticket for enached shadows ... I'm sure that a screener Times ago say to me that was allowed. Ple...Jump to post
He is not a headscreener and everyone, including crew, gets photos rejected...[/quote]
Oh yes I made mistake, he's a screener ... anyway smiles stay for practical joke!
I know that the period is not one of the best for a.net crew but sometimes take it easy ...
Dear all, .. Is this picture blurry but acceptable due to the news event or is this picture not blurry? ... For sure this picture is not perfect, but I think that due to the special Aircraft is acceptable, also I experience a lot of blurry rej, sometimes it depend on screener eyes.. pheraps a wrong...Jump to post
Thank's ... but I don't understand why :?: ... So that's why we took the above mentioned steps. Ah :roll: ok, I take this opportunity to ask if there is a sort of timetable for this "to do thing": 1-Upload queue statistic. 2-Photo statistic. 3-If there is a way to fix quality of certain p...Jump to post
Thank's ... but I don't understand whyJump to post
Is no more possible to select Dark watermark ...Jump to post
... Conclusion: - We see the correct quality when screening. - Photo corner pages still need to be modeled after the public pages, but this will be fixed soon. I hope this takes any doubt away once and for all now... Yes ok thsnks, About raw uploded, can you see all defect caused rej? I need to und...Jump to post
Hi all, we noticed that sometimes, for me especially in photo corner, whet I click on an uploaded photo to enlarge it, I got a 1920 x ... zoom despite original image was 1200 x or 1280 ... ususlly when it occours, you have in the address bar a filename end with http:// .....12.jpg example: http://im...Jump to post
@Federico, please confirm that the 3 links I posted above are indeed the photos in their correct sizes. ... In my book that's: - blurry - heathazed - quality The third one is wrong on my browser, is showed in 1280 but original is 1200 other 2 seems ok for dimension but... Make attention to the seco...Jump to post
airkas1 wrote:...3) This is on the list. Thanks for the screenshot, I'll add it to the entry.
Another question on this one: All three of your images have horrible banding and highly pixelated skies... ...Because for me they are 1920x1080 and it's definitely not what he uploaded... EC-KQC for example was @1200*800, but if I eq it I had a different result .. ?!? http://imgproc.airliners.net/p...Jump to post
Another question on this one: http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/1/6/3884611-v2ceff2a58e9-12.jpg Screener Decision: Rejected Double - I have no one aircraft uploaded with this reg... is there another double possible cause? Oversharpened - Is sharpen in the same way of other uploaded pic...Jump to post
Pleased to see improvement, againg some suggestion: 1-Top 5 take a lot of space in home page, agree with Thiago. 2-Photo's thumbnail again too big imho. 3-Info in photo's thumbnail are ok in list view but missed in the other display mode ( aircraft reg or s/n). try to see below an example if is poss...Jump to post