Re-edited AA got rejected for the exact same things. Some screener input would be appreciated, because for whatever reason I am struggling with this one.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 12ff1ee8d1
Hi, I don't have any of said photos accepted here, but if you look through the database, I'm sure you'd find several. That's probably your best bet to find what you're looking for.
So I've got 3 overexposed rejections and the AA was tossed for soft as well. Pretty confused how those are overexposed, I guess I can see some borderline soft areas on the AA. Thoughts? Thanks. PH-TFP: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/2/2/5527229.jpg?v=v4d933bd3858 N343RY: https://im...Jump to post
Sadly yes, I have taken a photo of the bird that crashed in ET302. I have photos of Lion's LQQ and LQR, but I did not get LQP on camera. Saw it flying in and out of BFI though.
Hi all, Unsure if this belongs in this forum or site-related, but given I found a thread from a few years ago on the same topic in this forum, here goes. I recently uploaded the first image of Air Europa's first MAX. As far as I'm aware, this should qualify for a banner, but I do not see one. Am I m...Jump to post
Hey all, back with a couple shots for prescreen. Running low on content with fewer MAX's to shoot, although hopefully that changes soon. CR2: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/0/2/5489201.jpg?v=v41354921ba3 C-32: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/9/1/5489195.jpg?v=v425b...Jump to post
Hi Kas, yes there is a bit of a grade on the runway, although very slight. This one got rejected for OS and CCW (again) and I have to be honest, I don't see either being a major issue. I guess I could see the titles being slightly OS but that's about all I can see, and that's nit picky. https://imgp...Jump to post
Thanks guys, I'll try a different frame instead. Here's two more level rejections I fail to see. CCW rotation is becoming awfully frustrating of late. The signpost on the freeway isn't a reliable reference as the freeway is on a slope, so if that's what they're using its not accurate. https://imgpro...Jump to post
Thanks for the help Jehan, bailed on the RAM since I wasn't happy with the quality and luckily caught it in better weather. Unfortunately, either I've forgotten how to level, or screeners are seeing something I'm not, because this was tossed for blurry/soft/needing CCW. Frankly, I see none of those ...Jump to post
Hey guys, little bit stuck with these. Initially the Aeromexico and Turkish were simply rejected for flat, which was obviously an issue, reuploaded and now Aeromexico is blurry/overexposed, Turkish is blurry/overexposed/noisy and RAM is blurry/oversharpened. Little confused how a pretty easily fixab...Jump to post
Thanks Evan, I was considering that too. I would've cropped it more similarly to the TUI but I thought chopping off the stripe would look silly. Just a personal preference. I'll wait for a screener's opinion before finalizing what I'll do. Happy New Year by the way!Jump to post
Thanks Evan, I decided to just decrease overall sharpening and they've been accepted. I am, however, a little confused with the low in frame on this one. It is nearly identical centering wise to my accepted TUI nose. Thoughts on this one? Rejected Norwegian: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airl...Jump to post
Thanks for the kind words gentlemen. I said I'd be back at the new year...I lied! :) Here's a couple oversharpened rejections that I'm not too sure about. They look alright to me, I guess I see a bit of jaggies on the WN reg but other than that I'm struggling to see the OS areas. Thoughts? Thanks! W...Jump to post
No prescreening in this post, but I'll have some after the holidays. I just wanted to extend a huge thank you to all who have helped me get to 200 acceptances. Screeners, members, crew, and anyone else not mentioned, thank you! I have learned a ton, advanced my skillset tremendously, made some fanta...Jump to post
Hey all, struggling to see the softness in this one. Rejected twice for soft, but now it looks OS in places rather than soft to me. Thoughts? Thanks!
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d0f5126677
Hello fellow Nikonian, if you've got the 70-300 3.5-5.6 VR FX AF-P version I would honestly stick with that, it's a quality lens imo. It should be plenty capable of anet. Hell, the majority of my shots are with the cheapo 55-300, I just recently got the above 70-300. There's a lot more involved in s...Jump to post
So this got rejected for blurry, appealed, and rejected for "soft at best." I am thoroughly confused as to how this is blurry, and/or where it is soft. Any thoughts?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... ab6157ca92
Hi all, I've just attempted to upload a few images, and the image is refusing to upload after a few hours of loading time. I still have queue slots left, so it isn't that. I'm certainly uploading a jpeg so it isn't that. I've just recently experienced the issue and it is across multiple images in mu...Jump to post
Okay so due to the large number of posts I don't know if I missed anything, but here's feedback on the six linked images. Eyes are also very tired so might be missing things. N569JB: borderline OS in spots, feels a bit flat N461UA: blurry towards the rear, OS in areas probably to mask blur N698DL: O...Jump to post
Hi all, a few more for prescreening here. Thanks! VT-GHI: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/6/8/5267863.jpg?v=v4e364ea2d8d N409AS: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/6/8/5267867.jpg?v=v43ae7c39014 N342UP: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/7/8/5267871.jpg?v...Jump to post
Evan, I doubt there is any fixing the first one due to the amount of heat haze. I'm assuming that was confusing wording and you meant both reasons for the second image. The first one is not going to be fixable, the second is. Also, crop factor doesn't affect aperture. If you have a cheaper lens, yo...Jump to post
Evan, I doubt there is any fixing the first one due to the amount of heat haze. I'm assuming that was confusing wording and you meant both reasons for the second image. The first one is not going to be fixable, the second is. Also, crop factor doesn't affect aperture. If you have a cheaper lens, you...Jump to post
Hi, cannot see the photo, best way to link those is to go to your rejected images, and hit copy image address, then paste that information here. However, in this case, it's not really necessary to see the image to directly answer your question. Common isn't really a rejection reason, but more of a w...Jump to post
Alright so the USAF 73G was accepted, here's the re-edit of 51ZM, and a Four Seasons 757. Thanks!
N51ZM: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 7d1a25b7da
G-TCSX: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... c1fc06f31e
I would suggest you bin all three rejections, especially 352UP, since you it was mentioned multiple times that was blurry. As far as new uploads: N14562: poor light, titles look blurry N698CB: noisy, blotchy sky, blurry at the front N254NV 1: blotchy, noisy, quality marginal N254NV 2: same as above ...Jump to post
Thanks Kas, I'll have a reupload of the Mustang tomorrow. In the meantime, this: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/3/9/5245931.jpg?v=v48a4fb9dd78 was deprioritized and I'm not really sure why. Its an unexpected visit of a military aircraft to an airport that doesn't usually get this t...Jump to post
N226NN has a super blotchy/noisy sky, seems slightly heat hazed as well. The quality isn't there on this one. 7727 is borderline overall quality, borderline OS in areas, and borderline noise. Looks a little blue to me too. Can't get some others to load due to whatever series of 502 error issue is cu...Jump to post
Hi Rainier, imo the titles, tail, cockpit windows are a bit OS. The pole is a bit annoying, but that's 50/50 on rejection or not. As for centering, was it originally rejected for high or low?Jump to post
Hi, Emirates looks blurryish at the front, a bit soft, could probably do with a little more contrast, and the level looks to me to need CW. Would probably be better at 1400, or possibly okay at current size with some more sharpening, especially at nose. Thai is dark but otherwise looks pretty okay t...Jump to post