What I find way worse than the repeated cloning issues is the rude & disrespectful behavior like calling screeners sick and not normal and whatever. I am sorry but from the outside it is very hard to understand that no permanent ban has been raised yet. This is against all lines of conduct. How...Jump to post
If you have anything to do with my person, please delete all my pictures from the database, I'm the village of idiots who see no one, or who see some reasons they see just as in the case of appeal. Those guys you talk about, from the other site that I was removed, you'd better ask what was the real ...Jump to post
This is a picture uploaded. Tell me what cloning see there. The raw capture is for see no obstacoles for cloning reason.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 54bae02442
Im recive this email. "Your image of UR-CAK shows signs of cloning. As you have been previously warned about cloning you now receive an upload ban of one month." Dude screener, are u crazy ? This picture no have obstacoles for cloning motive. Are u normal ? OMG !!!! I guess some of you do ...Jump to post
Is this two picture blurry or not ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... e9994831de
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 08b12a9920
Miguel1982 wrote:According to the rules it is, but you probably didn't want to hear that.
This picture is double or not ?
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Mol ... /5239975/L
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Mol ... /5239989/L
Because I received a ban on the site that I uploaded a photo that was rejected on the ground level, although it says the same reupload, although the picture is edited after the date of rejection of the previous image, on this occasion publicly request the head, to delete all photos and account on th...Jump to post
Good .. to create, I have nothing against. But how is it that I see differently from your people who call them experienced, but my appeals have been accepted by the bosses of these "experienced people" you talk about. If I was right and the picture was accepted, it means that it was unjust...Jump to post
The photos is in appeal. But it's good to see other screens and what mistakes they make. The more their bosses, maybe such screens do not have what they are looking for in this function. I only know how many pictures were rejected by certain scans with inexistence reasons that only they were seeing,...Jump to post
Look here. Reject for same, double etc. but picture is different angle, side, day. Watch and wonder what screeners can exist
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... f735dda7af
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-Lib ... /2624788/L
Im send email on the staff website, but not answer after two weks. Im report double recent picture. Im try here now. Why this guy no recive reject for double ? This aircraft is same, in a same day, same side, same photographers. https://www.airliners.net/photo/Ukraine-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-27UB/404445...Jump to post
Just suspicious it happend to the one guy who is banned from almost every site except here.... And how did his username changed while its duplication. Good luck with old Catalin/lcrv, paul dandea etc.... What are you talking about, dude? On what sites am I banned from? I change what name I want tha...Jump to post
Catalin81's photo with nice angle, lighting, and contrast is much more interesting than 50% of the database comprised of countless plain photos with boring blue or grey backdrop. And if he had just followed some very simple editing guidelines, it might be sitting on the front page right now. I`m re...Jump to post
Some screens are extraordinary. I reject good pictures where only they see some imaginary reasons. Boys, wake up..!!! I uploaded a picture that was rejected for bruises, and I edited again. If this is also blurry, it means that this screener does not have anything to do with aviation pictures. Proba...Jump to post
Because of my own mistake as well, I have given you the benefit of the doubt (not realizing) and lifted your ban. That said, be more thorough and don’t let it happen again, as you’ve built up quite a history of poor editing. @Karl, understood your posts. All opinions are listened to and this includ...Jump to post
I assume the mistake, I did not notice after the editing, Mistake? Did not notice? This is clear photomanipulation and is not the first example of such doctoring from you. Yes, it is a mistake because I did not notice that I was wrong with the edits, if I saw it we did not load the image, and we wo...Jump to post
I assume the mistake, I did not notice after the editing, but it seems too much to ban a week. I have reported so many blurred, dark, miserable images that have been accepted, and I have been told that this is, if the scanned user is, accepts and ready, but does not delete it, or cases with double i...Jump to post
Im recive this mail now for this picture. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Wizz-Air/Airbus-A320-232/4872585/L My sky is not modified, is only a bit dark. In this situation im report this abuse airlines manager. Have a incredibile screener. No proceded like other situation when im banned with no reason...Jump to post
Hi, Would you please share those photos which were rejected with Compression to us here ? So that we can know the situation you have clearly. Cheers, Harry This is only today reject, but have lot picture in this situation. http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/0/2/4829207.jpg?v=v4d0a8b34e...Jump to post
The acceptance guide (http://www.airliners.net/faq/photo_acceptance_guide/#double) suggests that is a valid double rejection. Unless they were taken on different days. And shouldn't this be in the photo feedback forum: http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=8 I think the part of the rule yo...Jump to post
I have upload this picture in data base, but im upload other picture with same plane, but recive reject for double, same side, and same day, but is not relevant for me. Is posibile to upload two similar registration per day, but more 90 dgree angle. In this case is more less 90 gree angle. Look here...Jump to post
I see photos every day that I think should have probably been rejected. I don't ask for the photos to be rejected; I just say, "hey, you might want to ask for a re-upload" or "hey, this photo is in the wrong category". So why not put the issue of rejection when some of my pictur...Jump to post
Screeners are held to the same standards as everyone else.. I know they are the same rules everywhere and for everyone, but unfortunately sometimes people on the site who have thousands of accepted pictures, screening is not done properly, and I easily accept seeing who is the uploaded picture. As ...Jump to post
Instead of complaining all the time about other pictures on the website, which you deem to be dark why don`t you put your rejected pictures here so others can see them. As for the two images you are moaning about they are not dark. HA,HA,HA ... I also put my pictures on other topics. If these are n...Jump to post
Why this picture no recive reject for dark ? because is screener and have lot picture on the website ? Im upload similar picture but screener send me reject for dark but picture was taken at sunset limit of the dark. This is taken in a middle day, but is verry dark http://www.airliners.net/photo/Sau...Jump to post
So you honestly expect each and every screener to be able to identify every airport in the world, and from every angle? Well, I am very sorry, but that's just unrealistic. If you know which place that is, please feel free to use the correction function on the photo. Or if you don't know, but know f...Jump to post
Out of interest, how do you know it isn't BBU?
Why this guy no recive reject for bad info ? Hre is not BBU/LRBS Bucharest Baneasa. Im recive reject for bad info, but other peaple no. I do not say he has accepted pictures that are underxposed. If I comment again, I'm jumping on other people in my head that I'm going over the pictures of others, b...Jump to post
I have some picture on the website, but name aircraft appear incomplete, only type model. Im try to edit, but there appear all aircraft data. What is the problem in this case ? This is a picture.Thanks. http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/NG-5/4521307/L http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/IS...Jump to post