ReneWendt wrote:Kas ( and others),
Could you have a look at the NEF file?
Something is happening in the proces from camera raw to jpeg.
I can upload the file when work is over tonight.
Thanks for the valuable feedback
Rossiya A319 : Would be better under smaller size IMO. VQ-BTW : Quiet underexposed/dark probably due to the poor light angle in this case. VP-BRN : The same as VQBTW and also will be better with smaller size. VP-BQG : Soft or even blurry toward the nose AND title part at this size. RA-42445 : Looks ...Jump to post
Hi Chris, AGU : Still looks soft or me especially the rear/tail part seems very soft. YAB : Level looks better now. But the wing and the tail looks soft/blurry IMO. KC30A : Underexposed and little bit low contrast for me.Light angle /condition was not quiet good. F35A : Front / Nose area looks blurr...Jump to post
Hi Solro, First of all, the sharpness for all of them look fine for me. Exposure does seem bit of tricky maybe due to weather / light condition in this case because of white background cloud.Your second attempt which to increase the exposure did make the BG seems overexposed to some extent. The reas...Jump to post
The exposure for both images does look underexposed to some extent, maybe due to the light angle at that time i think. Nevertheless, i checked this A/C in our DB and found that yours is would be the first image for this livery/paint in the DB ; )
Hello Evan, could somehow be salvaged if done properly or should I just not even bother? As Kas mentioned above, all five images do have those problems. And Blurry can not be salvaged actually. :( N496UA has obvious blurry at the title for me. N224WN as you mentioned it does have blurry and the reg ...Jump to post
Hello Solro, The Winglet shot's background has visible banding effect which can't not solved by reducing the size. Appealing it will not be successful IMO. The effect could be made by many factors. One of the efficient way is to re-edit it and see if it will become better also do a check for the ori...Jump to post
757F seems passable for me although i would like to use a smaller size since this one seems bit of noisy at this size. Second one looks fine IMO. Motive of AE is iffy for me i would probably give SO for this one about this issue. However, the color also seems weird in my screen. Tad cyan & blue....Jump to post
I can't load the image in your latest post.Jump to post
N569JB : Contrast seems fine for me but the title seems bit of blurry to me.You can wait more opinions as i would give it SO. Window : Better but still Marg due to the light condition. N414WN : The whole a/c is quiet blurry to me.Serious halos around the a/c especially tail and wing. N248WN : I supp...Jump to post
The tail part does seem to be bit of blurry. Besides, serious halos surround the whole a/c in this case. Also bit of underexposed.Jump to post
Both of them do not have very nice light condition. The first one looks pretty blurry for me, overall quality seems not so great.
Window shot is definitely Oversharpened as you can see some jaggys. BTW, it could be slightly brighter IMO, but need to take care of noise especially sky.
5270857 5270849 These two probably not as stunning as others here no matter from color or quality aspect. However, people who photograph this one in the airshow all shout WOW at that moment since this is the first time China Air Force did these actions and it's also the first time to see Vector Eng...Jump to post
For the AC B788. As you can see the bottom of the wing and the main gears have slight grey which shows it deserves a little bit contrast. IMO, 15-20 would be enough. As the weather was not very kind, you might be also need to pay attention to the exposure . Hope can help.
The latest version of N14907 will not make it i would say. Sorry. Since it's too blurry especially the half front part. Besides, it's too underexposed. Overall quality is too poor. Would suggest you to pick some shots with good weather and good light condition & angle to upload. Remember to set ...Jump to post
I can't access large image of this one although i refreshed it for 4 times : https://www.airliners.net/photo/Hainan-Airlines/Airbus-A330-343/5226147?qsp=eJwljUEKAjEQBP/S51xUdpXc9AN68APDZNBATMJkBJdl/26Mt6K7qV7BJZt87L5UgUcTUn7CoZLSq8GvffDOpgv86eiQCpPFkuHnaT85tKJ26R0CmZyZpZoE/POrBtFfJY2H8dEfdh1Eb4NxmHs...Jump to post
I used my old Iphone 5s few years ago. In 2016 Zhuhai Airshow, i used it to to take a static ground plane and uploaded with the edited version which looks not bad actually. But i found that if U wanna use a phone to take photos which will be uploaded here later, It would be better to avoid using Zoo...Jump to post
N54GZ : Slight HIF to me. I would tend to move it bit of lower since the tail dominate a lot upper space. N51ZM : Partly soft / blurry to me (Iffy). Reducing exposure or highlight slightly would be better IMO. B-1165 : Tad Oversharpened to me. N259DS : Tad cyan/green cast. Otherwise looks not bad to...Jump to post
N487WN : Oversharpened, Underexposed, Quality. - Poor light condition. N14153 : Heat Haze, Blurry, Soft, Quality, Underexposed. - Quality is too poor. N701GS : Blurry, Soft, Heat Haze, Quality, Underexposed. N241SY : Blurry, Underexposed, Soft, Quality, Noise. N485WN : Underexposed, Soft, Noise, Blu...Jump to post
Hi, The following are the Equalized versions from my PS : http://r.photo.store.qq.com/psb?/V13nQPHh1Yoabz/whTX.F0ZINADyQjByGlVSk8D6681Ucnb03kIPSc9fvo!/r/dEcBAAAAAAAA And here, the RED CIRCLE areas are dirty zones. You can recognize them clearly. http://r.photo.store.qq.com/psb?/V13nQPHh1Yoabz/dmK1sW...Jump to post
N965AT : The sunlit condition is quiet poor and marginal. Visible heat haze along the top side of the aircraft especially above the Reg part. Halo-ish around the tail. Underexposed to me. Partly soft too (like nose section). Whole quality isn't great. Hard to make it i think. Sorry
The LATAM B787 looks poor quality for me. Since the background is brighter than the aircraft, the aircraft seems unerexposed. Some parts look Oversharpened to me such as REG and tail.Engine and gears look bit of iffy as they look like blurry to me. Hard to make it i think.
N794AN : The quality of it is quiet marginal for me honestly. You can see that the sky is noisy especially those darker area and the areas under the wing. UPS : Poor light condition and the level of it seems to need bit of CW rotation. The angle of it is not a good one and the tail and the body look...Jump to post