Hi, I actually deleted that photo, but it would be helpful if you could check 6107693, Thanks! Would like to confirm if it's Cessna 608A taken at JXN ? Although it's ok to do so, highly recommend you to post links in the threads so that everyone can provide their thought on it if you like ! Since w...Jump to post
Anything which requires fixing? https://i.ibb.co/JkxshCM/IMG-8652-Edit-AP-BGK-1600-x-1067.jpg This one is very low contrast obviously I think. I can see slight heat haze along with the top edge of the aircraft in this case, and the size is too large to satisfy this standard in this case as well. So...Jump to post
https://i.ibb.co/SKXTTcZ/IMG-8300.jpg Is this worth occupying an upload slot? The quality for this one is veyr marginal I think. There's a obvious flares from light in the background above the nose of the aircraft.Looks some cw rotation might be needed as well. A little bit right in frame since the...Jump to post
Hi Yousaf, If you want to use Curve to adjust them, would be better to do both at the same time by using Curve since contrast and brightness / exposure are related to each other to some extent.Here's what I will do, you can try it to see the effect on your images. https://r.photo.store.qq.com/psc?/V...Jump to post
Hey Daniel, The light is not really good for this case. Also seems some CW rotation needed. Blurry looks alright for me, but it does look noisy at the dark areas like the bottom of the a/c. Our basic standard for the fences like this situation is that we allow fences, but they have to be lower than ...Jump to post
Hey Yousaf, Beautiful morning light. It looks low contrast for me mainly, and the rear parts seems blurry / soft feeling for me. Not sure whether it's the effect from the engines of something else. Would be better for you to add some exposure / brightness after increasing some contrast in this case....Jump to post
Hi, Just want to be cleared at the beginning that you can only upload one of them since they are the same aircraft with same day and same side. For me the first one looks better than the second one as the second one seems underexposed for me. However, I would suggest to use smaller size like 1200px ...Jump to post
So, for more accurate advices on your pre-screening photos I would strongly suggest you to post those photos after fully editing because we screen your after editing-version not originals although originals can be helpful for explaning something （ i.e. blurry）.
Hi Chris, Sorry for the late reply. Since both of these photos are Scanned Photos (I suppose), we (normal screener & Heads) cannot give accurate opinions on them because these photos would be distributed to another queue （Vintage Queue）for scanned experts to screen. For the second one, if it's p...Jump to post
Hello, I am very sorry that it does look unsalvagable for me as the sunlight is what it is (Strong Backlit). Your latest version does look a little bit better that you've tried to make it brighter, but the noise on the body of the a.c becomes obvious, and the contrast becomes low in this case. Whole...Jump to post
Color looks not so bad I think, but as screener mentioned that the body of the a.c has a little bit magenta / reddish color. Reducing it slightly would be good. BTW, you can actually just creat only on Thread for yourself and post all your problems there rather than making many like this ; ) Would b...Jump to post
Hi, Your photo actually looks fine for sharpness IMO, and you should understand that sometimes our screeners would have different opinions on some subjective reasons like sharpness. As far as I can tell is that your photo and the one by another photographer were screened by different screener in thi...Jump to post
Hi Daniel, The current version seems overexposed to me actually especially the body of the a/c and the background cloud.Little bit hard to distiguish the margin of the a/c and the sky at the top edge of the a/c. If this one was taken after sunset as you mentioned, I would not add lots of exposure or...Jump to post
Hi Yousaf, Flynas A320 looks not bad to me overall.Color looks fine from my side as well, but the quality at the sky seems kind of iffy as it looks noisy / compression at my side. I probably would second opinion this one by mentioning CW slightly and marginal sky quality since the I am iffy about th...Jump to post
Hello ! Yes, we do accept scanned images from many photogrpahers as they are precious for the whole world. If you want to upload scanned photos please ensure to use modern editor (ps or somethins) to make it looks as normal as possible (for color and something else). We have specific screening crews...Jump to post
Hi, My deep appology for this one since I am the first one who rejected it for Double wrongly. After that I've checked it again in our DB and your accepted images and found that you are right. I have already notified our Heads about that to see whether we could do for it. We will contact you ASAP on...Jump to post
This 757 image seems to have some heat haze along the top side of the aircraft even in this small size. The light isn't favored a lot in this case, top side of the aircraft seems very bright, rest part looks quiet underexposed. It would be hard to make it IMO.
Do not see High in frame obviously from this case.Overexposed should be related to the ground side.Lowering highlight / exposure slightly would be helpful although it looks acceptable for me. Agree with Matthew that only nose looks bit of soft. Contrast looks fine for me as well.
Hi Stefan, Sorry for the long waiting and late reply for your issue. I can't access the Appeal Queue since I am not HS, but there currently no obvious problems in system process. Many Heads and screeners are busy with the normal queue recently since they are very long and we hope to "cut "...Jump to post
Hi Daniel, Sorry for the late reply for your issue. I just checked the log to find the comment screener gave you. " Category Cargo needed." is the P.M. for you since you missed the Cargo category when upload. Sorry for the inconvenience about having trouble in receiving Emails. If you got ...Jump to post
Hi, The light is workable IMO. However, the color is bit of strange for me. I adjusted a little bit for the color by my screen, which probably could be helpful for you to refer : https://www.airliners.net/photos/uploads/204068.jpg?t=1583538311 I would recommend to use smaller size because this one l...Jump to post
Hi Rene, Exposure of this shot looks not bad for me since the weather condition is what it's in this case, but I would tend to add a little bit more contrast to it because overall looks grey-ish. Also, some CW rotation needed as well IMO. Many dust spots in the sky area, you would be better to check...Jump to post
Hi Rene, Weather and light looks not very bad since there some dark cloud in the background sky that can make the a/c light enough, but the whole image still looks very underexposed for me. Some CW rotation might be needed as well as the bacground verticle indicates that. I would tend to place the a...Jump to post
Hey Harry, Thanks for the feedback. Yea oversharpened I can fix I was more concerned with the washed out and somewhat overexposed sky. I already put a gradient exposure filter on it but that's about all I can do there. I'll play around with it some more tonight and then give it a shot probably :D A...Jump to post
Hi, Mikhail Sorry for the late reply for your thread. I understand that the reflection on the body is very nice, but the whole aircraft is very oversharpened as you can see some jaggy around th edge of the a/c. Those unknown black spots / objects would be better to be removed although those are bird...Jump to post
Hi ! It is a very nice shot and meaningful one as you told. But the quality for the image looks insufficient to satisfy this size. Thus, I would suggest you to try to use a smaller size rather than 1400px in this case. Current version looks very soft on the body and the since the body is gray + blac...Jump to post
Hello Richard, Sorry for the late reply for this thread. OR-ESO - Blurry, Underexposed, and soft. Airport Overview is quiet dark for the whole image due to bad light angle I think. CW needed IMO. OE-LBY - Blurry especially nose and tail.Center of body looks very soft. OE-LBF - CW Rotation needed app...Jump to post
Agree with Tim in terms of tighter crop needed for those. All of them also look low in frame for me sligtly. SVB: Low contrast, Underexposed, Soft (espeically at this size), Quality and Common might be given since DB has plenty common could be given due to same reason. Newzealand: Low contrast,overe...Jump to post
AF one looks with very nice light, but it looks soft for me at this size especially nose part and some other portions of the whole aircraft. I would also apply little bit CW Rotation to it as well since background sticks look bit of unlevel toward left side.
Hi Chris, Sorry for the late reply. Singapore 77W looks in low quality for me since it suffers from some heat haze I think, and the light isn't very good, which would decrease the possibility of accepting because our DB has already had lots of photo of this REG. Standard would be increased due to th...Jump to post