Devilfish wrote:RJMAZ wrote:The 767 fuselage is too wide for 7 abreast and too narrow for 8 abreast.
Which passengers love!
A380MSN004 wrote:what the point with this fly at rear of the cabin
OA940 wrote:If they can get the 778 to the range of the 77L they are golden.
I'm gonna go ahead and say if you're the 52nd reply, I don't think the post is a duplicate at that point.
I'm also thinking with the KE JV that SEA is done as far as more Nonstops to Asia and DTW-HKG is now pretty redundant as HKG can not be reached through ICN from most every major city in the USA they may even drop SEA-HKG now because it's more effective to use KE to get US based passengers to HKG as...Jump to post
Honestly, I'd say that this MU special livery is perfectly fine. I don't see any problems with it. Most of the other ones mentioned are also good enough in my eyes. As an ULCC, tacky and cheap is likely precisely what Spirit wishes to convey - so it's obviously working :lol: (the lettering is black ...Jump to post
B-HNL, the very first 777 ever built I thought N777UA was the first 777 to be built? I'm a little surprised that DL hasn't switched over to 10-across yet in their 777s, given that everyone else has. Anyone know why not? Just a desire for a better pax experience out of the goodness of their hearts? ...Jump to post
QF1 has always been SYD-LHR, but the midway point has changed over the years. (currently DXB)Jump to post
Headline articles in all the papers with videos, and videos in the tv news, I'm not sure what more you want: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11829230 "Air New Zealand says goodbye to the Dreamliner of its time" http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/news/910...Jump to post
This whole incident has got me thinking about how at the end of the day, modesty standards are inherently arbitrary. I've seen a few mentions of leggings being "tacky" and "inappropriate," but I honestly don't see how this is the case, since leggings do cover up the required area...Jump to post
If the 778 is discontinued, A.net will be filled with daily threads asking when the 778 (or 77L) will be brought back. There will also be lengthy debates as to whether the A350 ULR can comfortably operate SFO-DEL, JNB-ATL, and AKL-DOH.
It will be the 757 and MOM all over again.
I will: Pay more to avoid Fly at a less convenient time to me for business & personal arrangements Take an indirect routing In extremis - not fly at all, (there almost always is a way around the problem) If you're willing to go through all that trouble just to avoid a slightly narrower seat, fi...Jump to post
Overthecascades wrote:Can you add one extra seat per row on a 747-8i
c933103 wrote:They can nowcarry passengers between LAX and JFK?
Boeing778X wrote:Then answer this: How will 777-8 make the LHR-SYD segment nonstop with a full load with the default 10Y layout?
na wrote:748 has better and more individual First and Business class compartments, plus the choice between main and upper deck, and the wider seats in Eco as compared to the newest wave of cattle-class 77Ws are also better
enilria wrote:Oddly DL/AA/US aren't screaming about this like they did with EK/EY/QR.
By "LCC model" I mean: point-to-point network, Navitaire/ticketless system, high fleet utilization, singular aircraft type, non-unionized crew, unbundled add-ons. For a brand new airline, they would struggle to compete against established carriers. For an existing airline, it would be mor...Jump to post
I can't remember if it was the last thread or the one before that but EK413 mentioned that QF were considering not renewing leases on the 2 remaining A330's that haven't been refurbished (EBG and EBL). Some more information regarding that in link below http://australianaviation.com.au/2016/1 ... a3...Jump to post
It seems like only yesterday that people on sites such as Ausbt were predicting the fall of QF and rise of VA. sell off the 777s, let DL handle all of the N.Am longhaul DL would have to increase capacity to compensate. VA would have to wait until DL took delivery of the A359 to abandon the TPAC mark...Jump to post
IslandRob wrote:Can 777@3-4-3 and 787@3-3-3 Y seating on JAL birds be far off? -ir
While we're on the topic of cabotage, I have a question:
Jetstar operates NZ domestic flights with VH-registered aircraft. How did they get permission to do this?
Financial history and considerations aside, I don't quite understand the painfully slow, measured cautious approach, and "wow" factor QF is taking in introducing the 789 into service. It's not like they are the launch customer and an inexperienced operator, and surely they have done their...Jump to post
LAX772LR wrote:Back in the '80s, '90s, and prior? Sure.
In the age of the 777 and A350, not so much.
This thread is a proof ! Let's say, you pay for some seat for price X, then you pay for a seat that is smaller by about 10% for price X as well. Isn't that paying the same amount for a less service quality/product? I don't see any specific proof that CX is not going to reduce fares. It doesn't make...Jump to post
However, we dislike that service quality is going downwards and yet they are asking for the same price! Do you have any proof? This thread is a proof ! Let's say, you pay for some seat for price X, then you pay for a seat that is smaller by about 10% for price X as well. Isn't that paying the same ...Jump to post
Usually, flight 1 is considered to be the flagship route, though I'm sure there are exceptions. The way I see it, here are the conditions typically required for an aircraft type to be the flagship: 1. There must be at least 10 frames of the aircraft type in the fleet 2. If there are widebodies in th...Jump to post
A word about 1:1 replacements. There has *never* been a 1:1 replacement. The 707 had no 1:1 replacement, nor did the 727, 747, 757, 767, or the 772/77W. There is no 1:1 replacement for the DC-9, DC-10, or MD-11. There is no 1:1 replacement for any of the A300/A310 family. The only 1:1 replacements ...Jump to post
LamboAston wrote:No, what I mean is people just coming onto the thread to hate on it.
Doesn't this mean all legacy carriers are now just LCCs? I took Transat to Greece from YUL and it was pretty on par with the recent 777 service from AC. If that's the case, why would anyone fly legacy carriers? Maybe consumer intelligence will catch-up, or a downturn in traffic will lead to rising ...Jump to post
After SQ starts SIN-SFO and ICN-LAX, they will no longer send the A380 to LAX, giving LHR the advantage. Sorry to take off-topic, but what will SQ's presence on the US West Coast be? A359 to SFO, then SIN-ICN-LAX on 77W? Is there one I'm missing? SIN-NRT-LAX will remain, but downguaged to a 77W. No...Jump to post
How much further could the fuselage be stretched without encountering a 739/A346 problem?Jump to post
it is impossible with a 777. That's not true at all. A 77L could do this today, full pax load, no problem at all... and that's without the supplemental tanks. 778 should be able to do it with ridiculous ease, and an A359ULR will probably be able to carry a decent load as well. He probably meant it ...Jump to post