Re: Inconsistent screening

Thanks for the reply so far everyone. Im also interested in what are the minimum requirements in technology to be a screener. There would have to be some. In terms of screen power, and corrections. understanding of DSLR and photo processing would also be high on the list as a minimum. Or isn't ther...

Re: Inconsistent screening

So tonight I uploaded a shot of an Airtractor. The screener said to fix the over-sharpening and the category. And said the following: Correct all listed flaws and reupload as "priority" (first in database). Thanks". So I reload it with the corrections and now another screener...

Re: Inconsistent screening

Thanks for the reply so far everyone. Im also interested in what are the minimum requirements in technology to be a screener. There would have to be some. In terms of screen power, and corrections. understanding of DSLR and photo processing would also be high on the list as a minimum. Or isn't ther...

Re: One word answer rejections

Hi Dave, I took a look at your rejected photo. The screener left a message on why it was rejected for color, "Not double, but strong blue cast" When we reject for color, we do put the reason for the color rejection. Please take the time to read the Acceptance Guide. It is very useful if yo...

Re: Inconsistent screening

Hi, Sorry you’re having issues. Exposure and contrast is always going to be a tough rejection since like you mention, it can be a calibration issue for sure. All it takes is a monitor being too bright or too dim. We have certain guidelines on what equipment we should use when screening. If you give ...

Re: Question about prior screening deprioritized

Hello, I have uploaded two airlines photos with prior screening by new rules from 23.Aug. but both are deprioritized. There is no photos of both airlines at the airport even in Korea on database as mentioned in Q&A so I wonder deprioritized reason. Boeing 747-41R JetOneX (Longtail Aviation) REG...

Re: PAE (Everett) Commercial Passenger Service News and Discussion Thread

ytib wrote:

Is there any onsite car rentals as of yet at PAE, or are all of them a two mile plus shuttle bus away?

Re: Photo doesn't show up?

This happens sometimes, go ahead and submit it priority. In comments to screeners mention that it was accepted, and is stuck in processing.

Cheers,
Daniel

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

Newark727 wrote:

Think we could get this one without the dust spot on the sensor? Should be an easy fix.

Re: Level Rejection

Hello, This picture got rejected twice(appeal) for being not level(CW rotation) but in my opinion it's level. Maybe someone can help! Thanks and kind regards, Tom https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/4/5/6484549.jpg?v=v406a883f025 Hi Tom, Go ahead and appeal that image. It looks level. ...

Re: Priority Screening Inconsistency

The prio guidelines now say that if it's a first visit for a type and airline it qualifies for prio. As a general rule, if we don't have certain type of aircraft in the db from that airline at that airport, it can get prio screening. Hi Daniel, Thank you for your reply. Would you be able to comment...

Re: Priority Screening Inconsistency

Hi PanAm_DC10, last year a uploaded a 77W of Egyptair at AMS (an upgrade from the regular 737s - COVID-related). There were no other photos of an MS 77W at AMS in the database yet, so I uploaded it with priority. However the upload was deprioritized, but it I read your response it should be screene...

Re: settings for canon 90D

i have flicker i uploaded a few photos on there name donald moore It would be easier to provide a link for image. As far as settings and equipment. I'm not sure if you have the Version 1 on the 100-400L or not. Based on what I've seem that lens tends to be soft the closer you get to 400mm. I've sho...

Re: settings for canon 90D

moore1965 wrote:

Does anybody use a canon 90D on here? i need help with some settings have had trouble with soft photos if anybody could help me please let me know

Re: Absolutely BONKERS Screening

Hi Conner,

I've looked at two photos you mentioned. I would have to agree with the screening results. Take a look at the site to see what kind of photos we expect. The FAQ is good guide to begin with.

Cheers,
Daniel

Re: Post-screening gh6912

Based on the available acceptance rules, we need to clear up the registration info issues. The current guide says "If there are more than one aircraft in the photo, type the registration of the most visible aircraft (the registration(s) of the other(s) can be mentioned in the caption field).&qu...

Re: Photographer Ozell Stephens Jr. Passed Away

May he rest in Peace. His great photos will continue to live on the site.

Re: Post-screening gh6912

6275683 And here we have yet ANOTHER example! Pretty sure the airframe closest to the lens is a Southwest bird, not Oman Air. All I’m asking for is consistency. If this is accepted there’s no reason why the F-14 shot would not be Thanks for pointing out yet another example. As a rule yes, it has to...

Re: Unnatural Sky Rejection

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/9/4/6259499.jpg?v=v4d2ec8bb60c Rejected for “unnatural sky” and “low in frame” both are absolutely absurd. Is it really so unbelievable that these colors would occur at sunset? How can someone have so many images in the database and now be accused of...

Re: My 1,000 photo on ANet - a thank you to all that has helped

Hey guys, I just got my 1,000 photo uploaded this morning, and I thought I would come on here to where I spent a lot of my early days working to getting number 1 up there and beyond. https://www.airliners.net/photo/USA-Air-Force/Fairchild-A-10C-Thunderbolt-II/6252793 I want to say a huge thank you ...

Re: Can we upload other photgrapher's photos?

vikkyvik wrote:

dgorun wrote:

, the Air Zaire is no longer on the site.

That's the opposite of what Paul said would happen in the other thread. Can you provide some clarity?

Re: Can we upload other photgrapher's photos?

Per the guidelines the uploader has to own the photo and/or have permission form the photographer to upload the photo. Circumstances happen where it not easy to verify ownership. We do our best with the time we have. If can't verify ownership, we take the photo off the site. We are looking into both...

Re: CAPTCHA issue

We're looking in to it. I was able to successfully report the comment. it should be gone soon.

Re: Priority Screening Inconsistency

ufospotter wrote:

I have a photo,according with the rules of priority screening,but result is depriority. I created a topic here ask what is reason of depriority,but manager deleted the topic

Re: Negative views

Thanks for the posts everyone. Keep posting the view counts if possible.

We will have the development team take look to see why it's happening.

Daniel

Re: Photo issue

Ref. https://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/Cessna-R172K-Hawk-XP/5938541 While the thumbnail looks normal, the large version of this particular photo looks very dark and high contrast. Does anybody else have the same experience? We've seen similar issues when the color space is not set to sRGB wh...

Re: Photographer's choice

If PC voting does not attract a lot of votes every day and is subject to manipulation, then it might be time to do away with having the photographers select PC and replacing it with stand out shots selected by the screeners during the screening process. Other option could be for screeners to tag st...

Re: Photographer's choice

A system with a minimum of X votes would work best I think. I like the idea of upping the pictures required to vote for PC as well. But how do you know it isn’t some very experienced long term photographer with many photos on the site who is feeling upset by something and is doing this to make a po...

Re: Photographer's choice

A system with a minimum of X votes would work best I think. I like the idea of upping the pictures required to vote for PC as well. But how do you know it isn’t some very experienced long term photographer with many photos on the site who is feeling upset by something and is doing this to make a po...

Re: Photographer's choice

airkas1 wrote:

A system with a minimum of X votes would work best I think.

Re: Does correct info no longer matter?

Classic. Attack the messenger and ignore the real issue. If the photos were screened correctly, and more importantly, consistently, this would be a non issue. Thus, my original question. Also, important to keep in mind, the content creators are volunteers too. No one is attacking the messenger. It'...

Re: Does correct info no longer matter?

Kas - Thank you for taking the time to reply. It does not go unnoticed that you (and Jehan) are the only active screeners in the forums. It is a sad state that the screeners who are entrusted with maintaining the standards are unable, or unwilling, to follow the guidelines needed to have an image a...

Re: Blatant hit pumping - how can it be stopped?

I emailed the site manager several days ago asking him to look into this (not the first time I asked). He choose not to respond. It should be pretty easy to see which user account(s) are voting for what photos. I see another one of my photos has made PC again. It is a shame that someone is selfish ...

Re: Blatant hit pumping - how can it be stopped?

If you want to take pictures in poor light - more power to you. But, cheating to get views is weak. It’s good to challenge yourself once in a while. Some photogs don’t stop taking photos because the sun isn’t out. Taking photos of planes on the ground with the sun behind you is easy peazy lemon Squ...

Re: Blatant hit pumping - how can it be stopped?

I see the photo in question has since been promoted on Facebook, so that brings perfect clarity to this: its a non-issue and will actually be rewarded. Actions do indeed speak louder than words. Hi Royal, I don’t understand why you are concerning yourself so much regarding this. Seems to me like in...

Re: Test topic for airport codes on the forum

I took some pictures at PAE today. I want to take pictures at LAX.

Re: Air France returns to Seattle March 25

Here it is arriving today.

Re: Boeing prepares 10,000th 737 aircraft

WN732 wrote:

Who will be receiving this frame?

Re: Alaska to announce PAE destinations tomorrow

amcnd wrote:

Any equipment guesses??

Re: How Much Notice Does Boeing Give For First Flights?

For the "normal" roll outs, they don't post any first flight dates. Since things can change, and stuff can happen.

Re: Emirates A380 at SEA

There was a broken A380 at LAX, the one at SEA was the replacement for it,but it had to stop for fuel because of high winds enroute.