dutchspotter1 wrote:Curious why the blocked nosegear and engine wasn't mentioned as a rejection reason.
Thanks for the advice everybody. I agree there is some heathaze in the original especially in the far distance. I was able to shoot again and edited a new original. Is this any better? This original is sharper overall. Thanks https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/3/1/6011135.jpg?v=v41c133...Jump to post
Hi Stefan, Honetly,I do not recognize neither oversharpend nor overexposed from it. Exposure looks fine for me. Sharpness looks bit soft for me but not bad. That's my point of view. Regards, Hmm, I also thought it looked better than told. It was rejected by priority screener. So does that mean appe...Jump to post
Hello, I am trying to get a photo accepted of a couple of B777`s on the Schiphol runway but somehow it gets rejected for overexposed and oversharpened. I really can`t see the overexposed parts. The original is more underexposed than overexposed if I look at it. There are small glares on the rear of ...Jump to post
Hello spompert Can you let me know the photo ID numbers and I will take a look for you. Hello roadrunner As Johnkrist noted you are the only one to report this. Please contact us at [email protected].net and we will look into this for you. If you have any screenshots they would be helpful Thank you...Jump to post
Still nothing on the appeal queue. Is there some problem going on? Are others also experiencing long waiting times. Appeal photo now one week in the queue. Looks like there is some technical problem. Should I withdraw the photos from the queue? Hope to hear something. Thanks a lot. StefanJump to post
Hello, had this photo rejected for blurry, oversharpened and underexposed. https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/2/3/5822323.jpg?v=v44accea62e6 Strangely enough the original looks not blurry but sharp enough to edit. I find the other rejecting reasons a bit harsh. Maybe a smaller size wil...Jump to post
Still halos around the plane and oversharpened. There is no use in uploading if you aks me. What is your editing process? The halos mostly appear with lifting shadows, don`t you see them? How did you sharpen the plane? I might be wrong but I can see a lot of jaggies all around.Jump to post
airkas1 wrote:Hi all,
As you probably noticed, newly added photos aren't showing. We're aware and hoping for a fix as soon as possible. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Hello, this one was rejected for quality, noise, underexposes, dark.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... a162195608
I agree the light is not very favorable. But I managed to get other shots in same conditions accepted so was wondering what you think.
Stefan, for what's it worth I think you can get acceptances / acceptable shots with every DSLR lense outthere. I don't think it's the point for Karl, that does not even upload at the moment. The question is more: will these shots have sufficient quality for someone that is used to an L-Lense qualit...Jump to post
Hi Karl, I used this lens four quite a while before I upgraded to a L-lens. If I was you I would definitely buy it. Very good quality, cheap and light. Only some vignetting at 250mm at F8 and higher. But I got hundreds of photos accepted with this lens easily. Good luck. StefanJump to post
This photo was rejected for unmotivated crop: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/1/1/5743113.jpg?v=v4c3b8c5b9db I agree the crop is not standard but was hoping it would be a nice addition. I choose this angle because it shows the nose and people queing to get in. I was thinking the peo...Jump to post
Since you posted here, I'm not going to reply to your E-mail anymore. The 2 photos both seem like the upper deck/cockpit are out of focus. I don't know for sure why it was deprioritized, but it does kinda make sense. Nowhere does it show any festivities and it could be any other non-prio worithy ev...Jump to post
Hi, I attended a special KLM event yesterday and made two possible shots of a KLM B747. I have two questions about it. Do they make a chance? There are obstructions but perhaps due to the circumstances (inside a hanger and people visiting the plane) it is allowed? Also I clicked the priority box bec...Jump to post
I have given permission to airliners multiple times now and never asked for compensation. I don`t think there`s a chance of getting something in return and for me it was enough to get the exposure and views. Felt really rewarding to get the attention for my photos.Jump to post
What I don`t get is that the shot of D-ABUM gets so many views (80k) compared to other shots of it (couple of hundred). Am I missing something, but it looks like an ordinary shot of this plane.Jump to post
Hi, the links from your photocorner are not working. Better to link the location when opened in a separate page. The comparison I was able to see. The AirBridgeCargo on the left shows a lot of jaggies on the cheatlines and texts. So there is a lot of difference in my opinion with the one on the righ...Jump to post
Hi Chris, it's never a good thing to compare accepted photos with rejected ones. It's better to look at it from a objective view. Your photo looks slightly high in frame to me. Probably because of the high tail in combination with the horizontal position of the plane. The accepted shot looks also a ...Jump to post