Search found 2098 matches

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 42
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:38 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

getting back to the original question; in your opinion how does the IMB makes as a “possible consequence” a return to violence in NI I am genuinely interested in your view. The UK side wants to push this into a conflict and to make the EU and Ireland side perform something else than remain complete...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:03 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

But please show me a serious scholar who agrees with it. Can you point a to a legal text saying it cannot by yourself or scholar But we are getting side tracked again by your obfuscation, getting back to the original question; in your opinion how does the IMB makes as a “possible consequence” a ret...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 8:45 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

But please show me a serious scholar who agrees with it. Can you point a to a legal text saying it cannot by yourself or scholar But we are getting side tracked again by your obfuscation, getting back to the original question; in your opinion how does the IMB makes as a “possible consequence” a ret...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 2:56 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

I know you will not answer the question/s as that's your usual routine; :roll: personal attqack............... No personal attack, just an observation. Where does it say in the Belfast agreement it rule's out Customs checks on the Irish Border? Not playing your game, sorry. It is a political realit...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:29 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

you still not getting it. WA is a consequence of Britain leaving the EU in combination with the GFA. Wrong, A agreement to complete the WA is not a consequence of the Belfast Agreement or part of the process under A50, also nothing in the Belfast Agreement says we have to remain in regulatory align...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:06 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Article 50 says clearly what the WA does: ....In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the U...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:16 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

So? What’s wrong with that? Nothing it’s a prerogative by Brussels but some on here are assuming it is part of the process under A50 which it is not Article 50 says clearly what the WA does: ....In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude ...

Jump to post
by A101
Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:49 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Dogman wrote:
A101 wrote:
Dogman wrote:

It is a prerequisite of getting a FTA, though. In this particular case.


That is a decision by Brussels not part of the process of A50


So? What’s wrong with that?



Nothing it’s a prerogative by Brussels but some on here are assuming it is part of the process under A50 which it is not

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:43 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Dogman wrote:
A101 wrote:

A WA is not a prerequisite of leaving the EU


It is a prerequisite of getting a FTA, though. In this particular case.


That is a decision by Brussels not part of the process of A50

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:06 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Withdrawal agreement is the key document that enables brexit. WA was signed to be effective from 1st Feb 2020 and which happens also be the very same date 1st Feb 2020 when UK was finally not part of EU any more and celebrated brexit getting done. Coincidence? I think not. If brexiteers don't like ...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:03 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

The whole point of the IMB towards the WA/NIP is to respect the Belfast agreement from the EU from ill intent in its extreme interpretation of goods imported from the UK internal market But do tell how the implementation of IMB will lead to a return to violence? I thought you said you got it? Ok Du...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:27 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Sorry but what stops the terms of the WA and an FTA being defined at the same time? WA gets signed off and immediately after the remaning EU menbers sign off the UK-EU FTA. It is ludicrous to be negotiating these two issues sequentially when they could be done together. You introduce avoidable unce...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:04 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

It was already mentioned here many times why it was impossible. According to the EU rules the FTA had to be ratified by all current members. And that would include the UK. So, in this case the UK would be sitting on both sides of the negotiation table. And would vote on the acceptance of the FTA wi...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 10:23 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Where have i shifted the blame? You shift blame in virtually every single post you make, as is the way of the brexiteer. The problem with brexit, is the brexiteers themselves. Only they have the mind warping abilities to vote for something to garner something we already had, continually change the ...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:14 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

There you go: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/geo ... is-s-bill- “The Withdrawal Agreement and its attendant Northern Ireland Protocol represent treaty obligations of this country to which the government, in which I had the honour to serve as attorney-general, gave its solemn and binding word. ...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 23, 2020 2:22 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Martin Howe is a leading QC? Lol - okay, I’ll take your word for it and raise you one: Geoffrey Cox QC. And Attorney General. And Brexiteer. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/geo ... is-s-bill- Well I can’t open the link you provided, but I found an article on the BBC with Geoffrey Cox on the sub...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:52 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

guess you missed the parts where: - The Johnson government signed the WA - Parliament ratified the WA - The Johnson government puts forward the IMB and explicitly acknowledged that the bill would break international law. Hardly hard to miss it in the news reports But I guess you missed this by a le...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:46 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

So it now the Irish are at fault? So no deal is because of the Irish lobby in America and the Irish membership of the EU. The Irish have a lot of friends then. Seems to be quite useful to be part of a bigger group. Oh good grief, do you actually read what you write and think about what was said? Wh...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:28 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Ah right the legal mumble jumble again, why bother with it. The question you still fail to understand: how will the Irish border remain open with your beloved hardest Brexit? Nobody has been able to answer that one, they did a work around with placing the border in the Irish Sea, because then at le...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:16 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

All of whom were elected in 2017, after the 2016 Brexit vote. If you want to blame anyone, blame your fellow voters for getting that one wrong. Not the EU’s problem or fault. Did I blame the EU for a hostile parliament? I showed that the parliament was hostile and that EU-UK negotiations with the U...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:35 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

You mean that the hostile parliament in control by a fiercely pro remain speaker who wanted to disrespect the wishes of the majority who voted to leave the EU, and were vying for a position where that they could revoke A50 All of whom were elected in 2017, after the 2016 Brexit vote. If you want to...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:26 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

A101, you're rewriting history. The withdrawal agreement was negotiated by October 2019, but not voted/passed. Instead an election was called, in which BoJo sold this agreement to the British public. Then it was read in Parliament, and rushed through. BoJo had no reason to do that, or rather, he ha...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:18 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Ah right the legal mumble jumble again, why bother with it. The question you still fail to understand: how will the Irish border remain open with your beloved hardest Brexit? Nobody has been able to answer that one, they did a work around with placing the border in the Irish Sea, because then at le...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:16 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

You mean that the hostile parliament in control by a fiercely pro remain speaker who wanted to disrespect the wishes of the majority who voted to leave the EU, and were vying for a position where that they could revoke A50 All of whom were elected in 2017, after the 2016 Brexit vote. If you want to...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:13 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

1st up it was an agreement. If one party can change it unilaterally then it is no longer an agreement. Correct it is a withdrawal agreement, it’s still an agreement if it says you can do it. As I pointed out previously the NI Protocol allows you to change it unilaterally Secondly, if the UK can sim...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:38 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

What does this have to do with agreements signed between EU and UK? Are you serious? yes I am serious. What you saying is internal UK problem. EU is negotiating with UK. Last time I heard it meant the UK government and if the agreement is ratified on both sides, then it is not EU business anymore h...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:35 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

So can the EU now decide that they also don’t like the WA that they signed. What about any FTA, can the EU decide in six months to cancel bits. Ist up we are not talking about an FTA, but a withdrawal agreement and more to the point a peace agreement in which the EU tried to break. Don’t think peop...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:13 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

So he knew it was not a good agreement but rather than be up front and ask for an extension to allow sufficient time to negotiate a good agreement, he signed a bad agreement and now wants to tear it up. Is this what he will do with any FTA?. Do you think that the EU would have agreed to something t...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:07 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Two things: fundamentally Parliament is above the Government in a democracy. Second, really the EU forced the UK? Com'on, really you have found a way in your mind to blame the EU :lol: So basically we have a PM who campaigned on getting the WA through parlaiment, actually forced prospective MP's to...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:06 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

No internal mess if the EU didn't try to coerce the UK into signing a FTA using NI, it really goes to show the true colours of the EU to use NI as a weapon Nope, only shows your true colors in misreading the situation. The English - and yes I meant to exempt the English in this case - show they do ...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:41 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

And this situation has arisen entirely by the actions, freely entered into by the UK Government. Unfortunately the detrimental consequences are much more widely spread, degrading the esteem and influence in which Britain has enjoyed. I have to disagree, it was not freely entered by the Government b...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:27 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

No a minority May/Johnson government signed the renegotiated WA under duress from the Benn Act. Do you really think the WA would have been renegotiated if it wasn't for the hostile UK Parliament with the Benn act hanging over his head ready to pounce..... :rotfl: On 28 August 2019, Johnson advised ...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:23 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

No a minority May/Johnson government signed the renegotiated WA under duress from the Benn Act. Do you really think the WA would have been renegotiated if it wasn't for the hostile UK Parliament with the Benn act hanging over his head ready to pounce..... :rotfl: On 28 August 2019, Johnson advised ...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:57 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

I have to disagree, it was not freely entered by the Government but under duress by actions from a hostile parliament and EU. Say what? Under duress? :rotfl: A Johnson-led government with a significant majority renegotiated the WA, then hailed is as a great success. :checkeredflag: Now it's apparen...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 22, 2020 2:13 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

I have to disagree, it was not freely entered by the Government but under duress by actions from a hostile parliament and EU. “Hostile parliament”? You mean the MPs elected by the British people. You mean that the hostile parliament in control by a fiercely pro remain speaker who wanted to disrespe...

Jump to post
by A101
Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:53 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

In my humble opinion most others will see it for what it is, no other country has the unique problems of NI. Protecting the UK internal market and the Belfast agreement But in saying that it’s still not a good look for the UK, if no trade deal comes to pass with the EU then I believe the WA should ...

Jump to post
by A101
Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:08 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54242235 More trouble in Westminster. Serious question, 'Why would any country take the word of this government which signed an agreement and now wants a unilateral opt out'. In my humble opinion most others will see it for what it is, no other country has the...

Jump to post
by A101
Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:28 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

I agree it’s been a shit show as soon as they put a pro-remain at the helm of negotiations to whom they didn’t have the foresight to put the EU in there place from the beginning, they forgot to whom they were indebted too certainly not beholden to Brussels incorporation Euh... the WA was negotiated...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:59 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Can’t sour on the triumph if I personally never wanted that abomination of an WA in the beginning can I, should have ended up in the rubbish bin where it belonged when parliament failed it 3 times. ...but you were among those cheering the new WA along the lines of “they said it couldn’t be done”, c...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:58 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Clairvoyant? English is my second language, so I had to look up its meaning. I thought it was quite funny you're using a word which has a French origin, long live international cooperation. Bags the question why you would use it, perhaps google translate is doing its thing. Anyhow, how would you su...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:53 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

IMB passed its 2nd reading, I’m actually hoping it does not get up so there is more of a chance of the WA being rescinded in its entirety, one can only hope Already soured on last year’s WA “triumph“? I suppose I would hope the same too if I were a Brexiteer. Brexit is turning into the most pyrrhic...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 9:41 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

Yes we know, you are all for maximum consequences and small Brittian, the uK has become a rogue state by not obeying international agreements. The consequences will be huge. The international role of Britain will be dead for years to come. It has lost any moral high ground it has. It is a crazy sit...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:18 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

IMB passed its 2nd reading, I’m actually hoping it does not get up so there is more of a chance of the WA being rescinded in its entirety, one can only hope Yes we know, you are all for maximum consequences and small Brittian, the uK has become a rogue state by not obeying international agreements....

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:53 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

IMB pass 1st hurdle MPs backed the Internal Market Bill by 340 votes to 263. Remember when the WA passed the 1st hurdle? The UK’s played it’s hand. Unless the Commons does 180 (doubtful), or the Lords kiboshes it (possible?), the rest of what transpires in the UK doesn’t matter. Only the EU’s respo...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:03 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

:: IMB pass 1st hurdle MPs backed the Internal Market Bill by 340 votes to 263. Danish minister of foreign affairs Mr. Jeppe Kofod noticed that and warned Danish industries to prepare for the now more likely hard Brexit. Three months to prepare. Three months to invetigate for more favorable imports ...

Jump to post
by A101
Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:32 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

IMB pass 1st hurdle

MPs backed the Internal Market Bill by 340 votes to 263.

Jump to post
by A101
Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:53 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

I haven’t dropped the Vienna Convention, it’s still a course of action the government can use depending what actions the EU take. It’s something open to them as long as they like. Even if Johnson dropped the IMB According to whom? You? Or also some legal experts on international treaties? And if so...

Jump to post
by A101
Sun Sep 13, 2020 5:03 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

For all intents and purposes NI still remains in the UK customs territory with an internal UK market that has existed for over 200 hundred years. UK Parliament is sovereign and can make laws across the sovereign territory of the UK in which NI remains a part of. But Good grief how many times must i...

Jump to post
by A101
Sun Sep 13, 2020 2:30 am
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

A101 I know this is a long time argument of yours, a border infrastructure is not explicitely against the GFA. Right ? And you are right, there is nothing in texto. Most have already suggested that the wording was this way because a 35 pages agreement doesn't allow to be specific and in 1998 UK and...

Jump to post
by A101
Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:16 pm
Forum: Non-Aviation
Topic: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal
Replies: 1135
Views: 46066

Re: Brexit Part IX: Final rush to No Deal

olle wrote:
Reading your comments A101 I fully understands why the troubles in NI started in the first place. London seems to be a very far away from NI and also far away from Scotland...



Meaning what?

Jump to post
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 42