Any idea why… ...the K in EK? ...Y in EY? ...Q in SQ? ...X in CX? Singapore’s SQ comes from “Service Quality”. There is another theory: “Sweet hostess in your sarong kebaya, caring for me as only you know how, across half the world and more, Singapore girl you are a great way to fly!” Perhaps you h...Jump to post
Don’t take me wrong, but there is something insignificant that I do not like: the stylized kangaroo inside the zero. This is the universal sign of « forbidden » isn’t it? Such an occasion deserved a much better livery...Jump to post
I agree, it is not a waste of time. If he is successful, they will be able to raise her plane (unlike the Titanic) and put it in a museum (Smithsonian perhaps). It will be equivalent to finding Tutankhamun’s tomb. Once every one hundred years...
It will be Ballard’s crowning achievement.
3. Also, there had been other missions that had failed, so he knew where not to look. The navy must have known all along they say, with such huge target in their sonars, but would not reveal it. Personally I agree with the lady curator’s opinion. Amelia ditched somewhere near Howland, she won’t be f...Jump to post
I flew on a Tower Air 747 from Gatwick to Barbados in the late 1980s. It was a package holiday so charter flight. Seem to recall the aircraft was N601FF. My 3 memories of the flight out was firstly on take off looking out of the window and watching the two engines on the starboard wing swinging aro...Jump to post
JL has released its new uniform as part of the run up to the olympics. Inline with its conservative brand this is a refresh of the current design. Refresh? What refresh? Who is going to notice anything? Times change and uniforms reflect the spirit of the times. In the tradition of the « Olympic Spi...Jump to post
Some people are of the opinion that the plane was taken over electronically. All you're doing with this post is throwing out a red herring. You don't even seem to believe the theory you're posting. An airliner cannot be taken over "electronically". Of course it can, provided that electron...Jump to post
Some people are of the opinion that the plane was taken over electronically. And since that flight was a “lost case” anyway, the occupants were mercifully “put to sleep” -pilots included- by having the plane climb to 40.000 ft, and then by steering it “out there”, far away from airways, to uncharted...Jump to post
Nice try. If there was « something » in the cargo hold, it would not appear in the cargo manifest. A friend of mine believes it could be just that, and it would never be allowed to reach China. By the way, he told me something about a « dirty bomb ». Does anyone know what it is? Never heard of it.Jump to post
There is no Korean culture that makes any of these norms. Corporate culture is a different thing. This! Corporate culture or even military discipline. When you are sergeant you do not behave like that to your captain. You are asking for it. I would prefer a military where a senior is more afraid of...Jump to post
ITSTours wrote:There is no Korean culture that makes any of these norms.
Corporate culture is a different thing.
Ah, the question brings me back to the good old days of being a poor, starving medical student in Europe, in the days of transatlantic youth fares. (Think $200 rt, unrestricted ticket, other than no stopovers on the way). How did they fill those planes? Well, sometimes they didn't. Best flight was ...Jump to post
There is one more comment I would like to make: Somebody said that the captain got everything right and managed to disappear without a trace, baffling everyone. But the logical question follows: how can you say “without a trace” when he left all the incriminating evidence in his own home? When he co...Jump to post
Once again . . . a poster who thinks he knows how a person committing to suicide thinks. I just don't get that. Somebody seems to forget that Andreas Lubitz could have simply dove his plane into the Mediterranean. Instead, he used that old Rube Goldberg/dripping candlewax technique of setting his a...Jump to post
Going back to the context at hand it could either be interpreted as - evasive to avoid detection OR evasive to stay clear of populated land masses to avoid potential damage to life and property on the ground. Interesting point. It is strange but a few days ago I was discussing that with a friend of...Jump to post
The article served one purpose: to « serve » you their conclusion in the end, just as arbitrary as any, carefully prepared and attractively presented. Nothing can be proven. If the culprit had been one only, we would know it from the very beginning, no doubt. This is a conspiracy where each party co...Jump to post
Somebody asked me way up,in a derogatory way: «So, what is now your pet theory? » The answer is, I have never had a pet theory. I am willing to change my mind,I have second thoughts because I want to understand better. I have changed my mind three to four times. The things I believed once,I simply d...Jump to post
Sounds about right. It's also likely that he made a long turn around the city of Penang so he could look out the window and give a long emotional goodbye to his home town. That makes sense. That also would explain why he would choose that route rather than some other direction. The last land he saw...Jump to post
According to the article in the Atlantic: “There has been a serious flaw in the scenario of pilot-directed (or other) hijacking. Had Zaharie really wanted to disappear his jet, he would not have made the sudden turn to the left -as the plane did- but to the right, where, flying over The South China ...Jump to post
There is an article in the Daily Beast that calls the Atlantic article a "discredited conspiracy theory": https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-atlantics-william-langewiesche-dusts-off-discredited-conspiracy-theory-to-accuse-mh370-pilot-of-hijacking Interestingly, it says in the end: "Of...Jump to post