LAN Cargo : Not sure about the sharpness but looks bit of soft to me. Suggest you to wait more opinions. UA/KLAX : Iffy to me.... But not very soft. S7 : I have seen your RAW file and tried to edit in on my own. It seems that using smaller size like 1024PX or 1200PX can be better. The contrast of yo...Jump to post
Hi Len, The retro is iffy to me. But i think reducing Highlight might be helpful to the overexposed.Noise looks not very bad to me.But sharpness and exposure are iffy to me. UA 777 : Exposure of it looks ok to me but reducing bit of highlight will make it more comfortable. Sharpness looks not bad. C...Jump to post
OA940 wrote:Ouch! Did all the avionics go out or just some?
JeremyXWB wrote:BA 5390 vibes, anyone?
More details and clear pictures please click this link to see (English Version Introduction) :
There is another similar accident happened before.
This morning (May 14,2018). 3U8633 called 7700 in the air and the reason is that one of the pieces of cockpit glass fell off in the Air.
More details and pictures please click this link to see :
http://aeronauticsonline.com/sichuan-ai ... n-the-air/
Airport Overview : I'll let it go since the light condition is very poor and the quality of the whole picture looks poor too. Would be hard to make it i think. D-AAAY : Sharpness of it looks ok to me. Do not see compression issue from it and the noise looks not bad i think. But the exposure and colo...Jump to post
Blue Bird Cargo : HIF looks not bad to me although i would tend to move it little bit downward. Besides, it looks soft and underexposed to me. UPS : Looks better but the cockpit and nose look soft/blurry to me . QR A330 : Looks not bad to me. But i would like to promote bit of exposure since it look...Jump to post
Hi Cassidy, It's very pity that those fences obstruct the aircraft's gears. I remembered that A.net can only tolerate that those obstructions obstruct 50% of the gear or it won't be tolerated. This one, obviously over 50% I think. So unfournately. I like this sunlight and Plane to be honest. You can...Jump to post
Harry I just wanted to say your photos are looking better and better each time. Really nice. I'm planning a trip to Asia sometime late summer this year. If I'm near Guangzhou I will let you know. your airport looks like it's quite good for spotting! Cheers, Cassidy Thank you for your words Cassidy ...Jump to post
Yes, then try to add a bit more contrast (with perhaps a few more whites/brightness to not make the photo look to contrasy). Just enough to not get shot down for reuploading. Let me know when it's in the queue. Hi Kas, I uploaded the latest version this morning. It should be in the queue now. :D Ch...Jump to post
The rejected photo looks ok for me. Hello Kas, thank you. I agree with you that the rejected one looks not bad to me. But since the appealing result and the first rejection shows the same Rejection , I have to edit it again or do some adjustments to upload it again. So what do you think about the l...Jump to post
Hi guys, I got this pic rejected today for "Heat Haze" and "Low Contrast" : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/7/5/4984573.jpg?v=v437584f7a35 Then i edited another one today and give more contrast to it. Hope can get your opinions on it ! Hope it can pass since it's ...Jump to post
Hi chris, This 787 does better than before at some respects. But i think it still has some problems. First of all, the overall quality of it looks not so great since you can see that lots of the details of the planes are lost especially the bottom and the wing. Besides, it still has slight halo arou...Jump to post
Harry you are always very helpful. Thank you. That large dark area (halo) is quite large above the airplane. Are there any ways to fix this or should I throw this one in the trash? How can I prevent this in the future after making sure D-lighting is off? Hi, First of all, I don't know what factors ...Jump to post
Hi, I don't think you workflow has problem which will lead to Halo. But since your camera is Nikon i would like to suggest you to make sure that the" D-Lighting" function has already been switched off by you as this function will cause halo effect. Using "Equalize" in PS can hel...Jump to post
Hi, I don't think you workflow has problem which will lead to Halo. But since your camera is Nikon i would like to suggest you to make sure that the" D-Lighting" function has already been switched off by you as this function will cause halo effect. Using "Equalize" in PS can help...Jump to post
Hi, I would suggest you to show us the photos that you have already finished editing including resize because you are not gonna show the origin picture or such a large size to Screener. Kenya looks underexposed and slight low in frame. Some dirty spots are above the aircraft. TK 77W is pretty blurry...Jump to post
Thanks for your opinion Harry. What about this photo ? http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/9/6/4984695.jpg?v=v4994616cedf I am sorry. I afraid that this one will not make it in A.net since it's pretty blurry toward the front part especially the nose. As you can see those letters An-26B ...Jump to post
From exposure perspective, i prefer the last one. But i agree with the low contrast rejection since it can have more contrast but the exposure looks not bad to me. In addition, Halo should given at the last time since i can see slight Halo above the aircraft and around the cockpit area. Did you appl...Jump to post
Hi,here are my own opinions : Ural : Blurry to me. [Especially the front part and the tail.] LOT E175 : Soft and Blurry to me.Especially nose. Wizz : Front part looks blurry and soft.[Cockpit glasses are obvious.] LOT 738MAX : Soft & slight Blurry. Nordica : Blurry toward the Front part and titl...Jump to post
Victor, check out this link: https://youtu.be/sh6VM4KChhw?t=10m25s Does anyone know if Photoshop elements also has this lens correction option? I can't find it and really miss it. Or do I need to shoot in raw for this? Thanks My Photoshop version is CS6 which does have "Lens Correction". ...Jump to post
The first thing thai i want to mention is that the size you used for those photos are too big. 1 : Pretty blurry to me and slight underexposed. Poor quality i think. 2 : Undereposed to me. Also soft. Smaller size will be better. 3 : Underexposed. Soft. Slight blurry. 4 : Blurry, Quality slight under...Jump to post
1 : Exposure looks not so bad but i think reduce bit of Highlight might be more comfortable. It does can have more sharpness to it.BTW, using smaller size can be better i think. 3 : Do not see any very obvious noise from it. Sharpness looks not very bad to me. But agree with Quality since the whole ...Jump to post
Those two B787 are backlit which makes them hard to make it here. Tiger: Looks underexposed and blurry. Blurry maybe due to Heat haze i think. Jetstar looks pretty weird to me. Did you apply lots of Noise Reduction to it ? Lots of detail are lost especilly the bottom and the wings. Besides, the sky ...Jump to post
Hope can get your opiniosn on this Dash8 as i am not quiet sure if it looks ok ... Seldom edit propeller aircrafts :-\
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ba77cd55a2
How do you guys see compression in general? How do I avoid it? I really don't cosider that your photos rejected for compression have compression issue. If they have, maybe you can check your saving settings of PS or LR. Besides, i found that using too much "Reduce Noise" will cause Compre...Jump to post
Actually the photos isn't dark but the aircraft looks pretty dark due to the weather and light condition as the weather is overcast which will make the BG brighter than the aircraft so it's tough to deal with. And i think that's the reason that you always get "Dark" recently because the ph...Jump to post
UA A319 : It does soft i think. Title and windows look soft to me. B6 A320 : Tail looks soft i think. AA B738 : Looks better than last two but still can have bit of more sharpness i think. DL 717 : Looks not bad to me but still can has more sharpness i think especially the tail.(maybe due to the gla...Jump to post