Those kinds of flexible seats are used by many airlines, with both Airbus'es and Boeing's.
Jump to postIt looks like you forgot the whole MD family... DC-9, MD-80, MD-90.
Jump to postOA340,
Airbus did indeed express interest in bidding for the tanker contract (using the A330-200 and more U.S. based assembly), but I don't think it was ever evaluated, since there was no bidding. The contract was always intended for Boeing.
Sabenapilot, your explanation of engine bleed is very much appreciated -Thanks!
Jump to post<i>"As for the engines, the current Flight International has an article stating the 7E7 will use bleedless engines difficult to adapt to the A330 because they're designed for an aircraft with more electric, rather than hydraulic systems."</i> What kind of bull is this? <img src="/discussions/g...
Jump to postAvObserver - How much more efficient tha 7E7 will be over the A330 remains <b>very much in question</b>. You can claim an 20% figure (source?) all you want, but it is all speculation until they actually start finalizing on specifications and bending some metal. (or composites) <img src="/discu...
Jump to postI can guarantee you that the 7E7 will look much more conventional than these images when (or if) it finally becomes reality.
Jump to post<i><b>"Boeing wants us to believe this B7E7 dwawing is the fruit of months of hard labour by hundreds of engineers and technicians, whereas this link is prove it is most likely something they have come up with in half an hour or so to get at least some media attention in a time where Airbus is truly...
Jump to postSaab is owned by GM; so it's sort of an American car now.
And Volvo is owned by Ford! (Only the car-part, not Volovo trucks)
<i>you look closely you can see more seating ahead of this. It can't all be First & business.... </i> Nope, look closer - it is just a reflection of the same cabin. The windows going down indicates that this is indeed the front section. But I am severely unimpressed by these images... The far out an...
Jump to postHuh? When I flew a Delta Connection CRJ-700 last month, the seating was also 2+2. (and quite comfortable, I might add)
Jump to post<i>""200-250 passengers in three-class configuration 250-300 passengers in two-class configuration 300-350 passengers in single-class configuration" http://www.boeing.com/commercial/7e7/background.html In other words: Bigger than a 757, encroaching on the 767. "</i> Sigh... Why do people keep bringi...
Jump to postI agree with Cx flyboy, Suddenly Boeing trumpets ideas that Airbus have <b>pioneered and implemented</b> for 20+ years (commonality, advanced materials), as if it is something brand new that will create a huge advantage for Boeing. Especially since they have been spending the last 20+ years explaini...
Jump to postCX747: "<i>7S7 (737 replacement) <b>7E7 (757/767 replacement)</b> 777</i>" I'm not sure what specs your have been reading, but how in the world is the 7E7 a 757 replacement? It clearly lies squarely between the 767 and 777 in size, and that is a major problem for Boeing. The 7E7 will cannibalize 777...
Jump to postYeah, Pan-Am flew a LOT of earo A310 flights from JFK. I remember seeing them at ARN (stockholm) daily, for example.
Jump to postIs this aircraft due for retirement, and/or was it part of the SAS/Boeing buy-back deal in exchange for MD-90's?
Jump to postSo what exactly is the point of building two different circular cross section airliners (777 and 7E7), when the difference in diameter is so very small? Heck, the 7E7 will be even wider than the A300-A340 series! <img src="/discussions/graphics/smile.gif" ALT="Smile"> (although very close) It ...
Jump to postHere's an external pic of the cargo-bay F/A crew rest component: <br><center><font color="#EEEEEE" size="1" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva"><a href="/open.file/099314/L/" target="_blank">View Large</a> <a href="/open.file/099314/M/" target="_blank">View Medium<br><IMG SRC="/photos/small/4/1/3/099314...
Jump to postHow about Olympic? They haven't changed their livery for ages...
Jump to postI actually like the new official livery better than Lila's... Lila's proposal looks like a killer whale (Southwest's Shamu anyone?) <img src="/discussions/graphics/wink.gif" ALT="Big grin">, and the cockpit paint looks a bit strange. But the biggest problem with the official livery is the flag...
Jump to post<i>"150 isn't such a bad number when you consider that this was a through flight from <acronym title="Sydney - Kingsford Smith International (Mascot) (SYD / YSSY), Australia - New South Wales">SYD</acronym>, where paxs had already deplaned."</i> I though <acronym title="United Airlines (USA)">UA</ac...
Jump to post150... Not a good load-factor, I imagine...
Jump to post"It says 17% better fuel cost per pax than a 767-300, and 20% better than an A330-200."
So the 767-300 is more efficient than the A330-200? I find this hard to believe... Very suspect.
<i>"I did not realize that. How did Airbus market the aircraft? What was the key selling point?"</i> One word - <b>range</b>. The -200 initially had greater range than the -300. But once the -313X came out (increased MTOW), it had the same range as the -200. This killed off any interest in the -200....
Jump to postIt's a bizarre world we live in - Southwest offering more food service than the majors!
(On 2hr-4hr flights, anyway)
<i>"Low MTOW A330? I cant' find anything about that on the website. Maybe it's hidden in a press release somewhere?"</i> That's because a low MTOW or short-range A320 <b>doesn't exist</b>. We are all talking about a hypothetical aircraft - just as we are about a short-range 7E7. Airbus tried twice t...
Jump to post<i>"I've seen that <acronym title="Lufthansa (Germany)">LH</acronym> <acronym title="Port of Spain/Trinidad - Piarco Int'l (POS), Trinidad and Tobago">POS</acronym> clawing at the air several times departing <acronym title="Phoenix - Sky Harbor International (PHX / KPHX), USA - Arizona">PHX</acronym...
Jump to post<i>"I think the Boeing 7E7 would be great for the routes now operated by <acronym title="Singapore Airlines">SQ</acronym>'s A310-300.s"</i> How do you know? Certainly not by what specs Boeing has released so far. As far as we know, <b>the 7E7 is planned to be a long-range aircraft</b> with a similar...
Jump to postThe lease payments on the 777's were probably too high for them, and they may also have unable to sell enough seats to make them worthwhile.
Anyway, Russia wants good relations with bot the US and EU, so it makes sense that they would have aeroflot buy both Airbus and Boeings.
<i>"Yes, United has been poorly managed, but the attacks of Sept 11th put this industry into a tail spin."</i> United (and many others) were in a tail spin way before 9/11. <i>"Now the government set aside funds to help the airlines. USE the funds."</i> There is no sense in throwing money down the d...
Jump to postNice... Very nice. The Star livery looks much better on an A320 than LH's 744.
Jump to post<i>There is no way UNITED will ever pull out of <acronym title="Denver - Stapleton International (DEN / KDEN) (Closed), USA - Colorado">DEN</acronym>, UNITED owns Colorado.</i> How will UNited stay in <acronym title="Denver - Stapleton International (DEN / KDEN) (Closed), USA - Colorado">DEN</acrony...
Jump to postHowcome, because of that, do the pictures display different aircraft? For example, the Varig/Rio Sul planes
Umm... I hate to state the obvious - but because they were taken at different times. March and June. Look at the inforamtion at the bottom of each A.net image.
<i>Actually, I think it's a smart move. It fits into Boeing's market strategy for more point to point service. But also, <b>the 7E7 will fill the airlines needs for more efficiency on shorter routes</b>.</i> Huh? How exactly is a high-MTOW aircraft frame efficient for shorter routes? It isn't. A lot...
Jump to postSigh... There's already a MASSIVE thread about that document here in the forum:
https://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1027825/
"At altitude over the Pacific you could see the curvature of the earth,"
I suspect that this has more to do with the wide-angle lens of the tail camera...
Hmmm... I wonder. If <acronym title="United Airlines (USA)">UA</acronym> goes under, will SAS perhaps shift their <acronym title="Copenhagen - Kastrup (CPH / EKCH), Denmark">CPH</acronym>-<acronym title="Washington - Dulles International (IAD / KIAD), USA - Virginia">IAD</acronym> flight to <acronym...
Jump to postI assume this will be a direct flight, or is a continuation of Beijing? I'm only asking because Finnair must be stretching their Md-11 fleet pretty thin if it is direct. But I suppose it will be possible when the 5th one enters service.
Jump to post<i>"I don't WANT an LCC to fill the voids. I travel on business sometimes two distant places a week. I want my upgrades and a good FFP."</i> It's not like United is the only full-service carrier. (whatever "full-service" means these days - Southwest with assigned seating and grumpier crew?) Others w...
Jump to postSAS has PTV's in all classes on all A330/340 flights, which is the majority. The only exceptions are the 767 flights (<acronym title="Copenhagen - Kastrup (CPH / EKCH), Denmark">CPH</acronym>-<acronym title="Washington - Dulles International (IAD / KIAD), USA - Virginia">IAD</acronym>, <acronym titl...
Jump to postI'd still rather be on the left side in an MD-80/90/717!!!
Now THAT is something we can all agree on!
Many airlines that fly both the 737/757 and A320 use the same seats (or seat width) for both, thus the aisle is a bit wider on the A320 series. Quite nice IMO. At least that seemed to be the case when a flew UA A320's a while back.
Jump to postThey can't. And even if they had the $$$, they'd be better off designing a new craft rather then resurrecting Buran.
"It's dead, Jim".
For those comparing costs between Soyuz and shuttle - <b>You could launch 20-30 Soyuz</b> for the same price as a Shuttle launch. No joke. Remember Tito payed $20 million for his ticket - and many space observers believe that it probably covered the cost of his flight, plus a small profit. The Space...
Jump to postTwo things:
- Airbus gave EasyJet an exceptional deal
- Boeing gave Ryanair an exceptional deal
It is just natural for other customers of both Airbus and Boeing to try to get deals just as good.
<i>Just a query. Would the shuttle be able to attain orbit if it was carried aloft by the 747 shuttle carrier to an altitude of say 45,000 feet and then seperated, shuttles 3 main engines are then ignited and it flies to <acronym title="Ocana (LEOC), Spain">LEO</acronym>. Would this be possible?? Do...
Jump to post<i>"Don't you find it rather interesting that Boeing has not even selected a preferred initial seating capacity (either 210 or 250) and Flug Revue already has a specific length for it? I assure you, nothing is set yet."</i> Of course nothing is set in stone at this point. What is very likely, howeve...
Jump to post