<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/wilco737" class="quote" target="_blank">wilco737</a> (<a href="#11" class="quote">Reply 11</a>):<br/><i>Please stay on topic </i></font></td></t...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/planespot" class="quote" target="_blank">planespot</a> (<a href="#2" class="quote">Reply 2</a>):<br/><i>these days, the Top 5 is largely dictate...
Jump to postThanks Mark. If this is an acceptable level of lightening than I am genuinely surprised. To me that looks unnaturally 'brightened'. To me the sky looks completely blown out and the grey of the aircraft looks nothing like the actual colour of the aircraft. But hey, if this is what the screeners sugge...
Jump to postThanks for the feedback guys. <table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/angad84" class="quote" target="_blank">angad84</a> (<a href="#4" class="quote">Reply 4</a>):<br/><i>An easy fix, a...
Jump to postHi guys, Had this one done for 'grainy and soft'. I disagreed and appealed, then it came back with grainy and soft removed, and replaced with 'dark'. <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/APPEAL_20131102_e1382608388.7052ussbonhommerichard158edit1280b.jpg" target="_blank">http://...
Jump to postA happy ending for this shot. I tried a slighlty tighter crop on a new edit and it has just been accepted. Thanks for the feedback on this one guys... I very much appreciated it! <br/><center><font color="#EEEEEE" size="1" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva"><a href="/photo/USA---Navy/Boeing-F-A-18F-Sup...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/aussie18" class="quote" target="_blank">aussie18</a> (<a href="#22" class="quote">Reply 22</a>):<br/><i>You need to remember as screeners we are...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/acontador" class="quote" target="_blank">acontador</a> (<a href="#7" class="quote">Reply 7</a>):<br/><i>That's for sure not a very good idea</i>...
Jump to postI guess we are left with only one option in cases like this... wait a few weeks, re upload the shot and take your chances again with the kind of screener you get. I'm sure we all have plenty of shots in the <acronym title="Brit Air (France)">DB</acronym> that were unacceptable to some screeners, but...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/angad84" class="quote" target="_blank">angad84</a> (<a href="#12" class="quote">Reply 12</a>):<br/><i>But there were other (valid) reasons too, ...
Jump to postThanks for the feedback guys. <table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/aussie18" class="quote" target="_blank">aussie18</a> (<a href="#8" class="quote">Reply 8</a>):<br/><i>The image co...
Jump to postHi everyone, I've been playing around with some ''borderline' images from years gone by and thought I'd throw a few into the que. This one came back rejected for 'distance' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/APPEAL_20131014_b1380871296.0935sausten28021280.jpg" target="_blank"...
Jump to postThanks Vik. Rejection upheld on appeal. Any comment on the second edit?
Steve
Thanks guys.
How's this rework. I took your advice Karl and added a touch more contrast.
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...379230670.6754sausten27791280b.jpg
Cheers
Steve
Hi Guys, Just had this one done for ''quality grainy common' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130914_a1378196882.7792sausten27791280.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1378196882.7792sausten27791280.jpg</a> I have two questions. 1) Are the quality...
Jump to postThanks for the input guys. Personally, I thought the crop was interesting and unique. The wingtip to me is not distracting at all. But, I'm happy to go with the wisdom of the crowd. It's an easy fix to crop just below the wingtip.
Steve
Hi guys, Just wanted to run this past a few more sets of eyes and get some opinions. This shot was rejected for ''Crop is unmotivated,please include the winglet for this style crop motiv personal''. <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130807_p1374914206.2041sausten26881280.j...
Jump to postCan I get another opinion on this one. Rejected for ''Sorry Steven, high in frame centered personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130708_u1372232162.4652sausten26511280.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1372232162.4652sausten26511280.jpg</a>...
Jump to postThanks guys. I've always struggled with soft/ sharpness. Just one more. Still getting used to a slightly different look in this new screen. Any comment on sharpness, colour, contrast and grain appreciated. <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/m1373097529.5577sausten26741280.jpg" tar...
Jump to postHey guys, On the weekend my trusty old monitor decided it had had enough and refused to work. I've just bought a Philips 247E3L <acronym title="St. Petersburg (Leningrad) - Pulkovo (LED / ULLI), Russia">LED</acronym> monitor. I'm pretty happy with it so far, but I will be interested to see how ''dif...
Jump to postThanks guys. The original looked ok to me. I'll have play a come up with a smaller version and see how it goes.
Jump to postHey guys, This one was just done for ''still soft in places and even some blur, noisy in shadows, might work in 1024 pixels width quality grainy soft common personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130609_y1369812064.0176sausten25801280d3.jpg" target="_blank">http://ww...
Jump to postFirst off, looks like a great shot Hendra. Well done! <table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/henkita217" class="quote" target="_blank">henkita217</a> (<a href="#126" class="quote">Rep...
Jump to postThanks Mark, Obviously it's zoomed out much farther than typical shots from this spot which has meant more heat haze is included in the shot. I think also the jet wash from the Thai 74 makes it look worse. If you don't mind being specific, were to you see the jaggies. I only ask because this shot ha...
Jump to postCan I get some views on this one. First upload rejected for ''harsh contrast oversharpened contrast personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130531_m1369036757.6867sausten25811280.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1369036757.6867sausten2581128...
Jump to postThanks guys. That was actually the rework of this one rejected for soft/grainy <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130525_t1368514456.9167sausten25541280c.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...368514456.9167sausten25541280c.jpg</a> It was taken from the...
Jump to postCan i get some opinions of this one regarding grain and sharpness.
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...369638425.4356sausten25541280d.jpg
Thanks
Steve
<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/vikkyvik" class="quote" target="_blank">vikkyvik</a> (<a href="#59" class="quote">Reply 59</a>):<br/><i>But at the end of the day, the only shot...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/JakTrax" class="quote" target="_blank">JakTrax</a> (<a href="#54" class="quote">Reply 54</a>):<br/><i>There are plenty of 'marginal' shots in th...
Jump to postThanks Vik. I must admit I find the whole dark criteria very frustrating. This image was taken at dusk (after the sun had gone below the horizon) and has been brightened beyond what was natural and still is considered dark. While as Karl says, plenty of what I and others consider darker shots taken ...
Jump to postThis one was done for ''Darkish. Noisy. Should be better at smaller size grainy dark personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130523_c1368307709.6749sausten25681280b.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...368307709.6749sausten25681280b.jpg</a> I ho...
Jump to postFirst one looks fine to me. Second one looks fine to me. Guess that's why I'll never be a screener! I think its the titles on the second attempt that show the jaggies. Those <acronym title="British Airways">BA</acronym> titles are always tricky to get right. I have heard of using the blur tool to ve...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/derekf" class="quote" target="_blank">derekf</a> (<a href="#45" class="quote">Reply 45</a>):<br/><i>With reference to the rejection due to the c...
Jump to postThanks Mark for the constructive feedback. I've had a play and come up with this.
https://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...368778211.863sausten25801280d2.jpg
Hows this one look?
Steve
No worries Dana. This one was just rejected again (see reply 22 - the typo reject!) This time for ''titled jagged now,also white spec in sky right side of tail,Unmotivated crop on left engine aswell. motiv oversharpened dirty personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/2013...
Jump to postSorry mate. I thought you were allowed to refer to the feedback forum when appealing. I think I said " after seeking advice in the feedback forum" and put a link to here. I'll make sure I don't do that in the future.
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/sausten" class="quote" target="_blank">sausten</a> (<a href="#28" class="quote">Reply 28</a>):<br/><i>I'm still struggling with this one...</i><...
Jump to postAt the moment I increase the contrast to the whole image. I just wonder if by doing that I exaggerate any grain in the sky.
Jump to postSimilar story to above. Rejected twice for contrast (needs more - first time also included cyan colour cast /second time also included soft). Rejected today for' still soft, more contrast needed grainy soft overexposed contrast' I'm curious if by adding more contrast to the whole image i am inadvert...
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/dendrobatid" class="quote" target="_blank">dendrobatid</a> (<a href="#10" class="quote">Reply 10</a>):<br/><i>There are currently quite a few tr...
Jump to postThanks for letting me know Dana. It must be my eyes playing up again! I'm still struggling with this one... <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130505_i1366925403.8275sausten25151280c.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...366925403.8275sausten25151280c....
Jump to post<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/Newark727" class="quote" target="_blank">Newark727</a> (<a href="#5" class="quote">Reply 5</a>):<br/><i>Wait, is that light?</i></font></td></tr...
Jump to postThanks Karl for starting the thread. Agree 100% with your OP. I have been uploading her for a number of years now and have noticed a significant jump in the quality standards expected- particularly with regard to grain. Despite experience and better equipment, my acceptance ratio was at its lowest a...
Jump to postI'm 'retiring' this shot and won't be trying to work on it anymore, but can someone please point out to me the blurry parts? <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130504_a1366836608.6323sausten24421080b.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...366836608.6323...
Jump to postThanks Dana. Is there any way (bar appealing) to find out for sure? I did not receive a rejection email.
Jump to postSimilar issues as my opening post. This shot rejected for 'grainy/ common' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130503_c1366749276.9997sausten25801280.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1366749276.9997sausten25801280.jpg</a> I honestly can't see any n...
Jump to postLooks fine to me. The length and angle of the shadows clearly suggest the sun is sinking lower.. and this is the resulting natural light of that time of day. Having said that... considering my appalling acceptance ratio lately, I'd wait for someone more qualified than I to weigh in, before appealing...
Jump to postAfter years shooting from this location my latest batch of uploads from here have struggled to be accepted. The issue is contrast. This one was rejected for ''low contrast contrast personal'' <a href="http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20130424_u1366058865.6303sausten25151280b.jpg" ta...
Jump to post