If the wing box is outside the pressure hull, it’d be just like any passenger liner. Or, like ACT tanks in baggage. I don’t know how it was designed, I do know the wing box reduces the ceiling height from friends who flew it, esp loads. Maybe ASD knows how it was certified, maybe it’s like the A400.Jump to post
A good, but not very accurate, idea of altitude. Mostly, by how much detail can be observed. From anywhere below 18,000, very good detail, less so in the thirties, by the middle forties, not worth looking out, not much to see.Jump to post
I’m not positive it’s in the pressure vessel, it might not be any different that a center wing box tank, just overhead. No, I’m not saying it isnt, either, I just don’t know. While there is more flexibility in military certification, the C-17 does have civil certification.Jump to post
Yes, thrust to idle, speed brakes as needed, once on the approach, use configuration changes to slow to Vref. We don’t use the boards at 180 knots to slow to 160 knots for the next flap setting.Jump to post
LCDFlight wrote:If the fuselage tank catches fire, this could be deadly to passengers. However, a fire in a wing tank would also be quite hazardous, at least as I picture it.
The only large planes I can think without center fuel are the C-130, C-141 and C-5. The C-17 added fuel in the wing box as a cut-in during production—60,000#, I think. They needed the range. I don’t think the Gulfstreams have center fuel, either. Isn’t that center fuel tank on the C17 clearly visib...Jump to post
The WSJ (paywall) just posted an interesting article which included the fact armorers are supposed to display to the talent that gun is empty. This is the standard protocol used in shooting everywhere when handing off a weapon. https://www.wsj.com/articles/on-set-of-alec-baldwin-movie-some-basic-gu...Jump to post
The WSJ (paywall) just posted an interesting article which included the fact armorers are supposed to display to the talent that gun is empty. This is the standard protocol used in shooting everywhere when handing off a weapon. https://www.wsj.com/articles/on-set-of-alec-baldwin-movie-some-basic-gun...Jump to post
The only large planes I can think without center fuel are the C-130, C-141 and C-5. The C-17 added fuel in the wing box as a cut-in during production—60,000#, I think. They needed the range. I don’t think the Gulfstreams have center fuel, either.Jump to post
Great airplane, poor financial outcome. Much like the A220Jump to post
I suggest you read up on the "Reichstag Fire" of Monday 27 February 1933. Read up on why Friday the 13th is unlucky. Goes back to 1307 and Phillip the “Fair”. Gaslighting, fake news and politicians practicing envy and theft politics are part of the human condition. Of course. But nowadays...Jump to post
And then there is this - https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/25/facebook-jan-6-election-claims-516997 I suggest you read up on the "Reichstag Fire" of Monday 27 February 1933. Read up on why Friday the 13th is unlucky. Goes back to 1307 and Phillip the “Fair”. Gaslighting, fake news and...Jump to post
It’s probably because on a film set there are a couple of baseline expectations about firearm use: 1. There will not be bullets in use 2. The talent will receive the prop from staff and be told by the director, AD, or an instructor how they will use it in scene 3. Actual use will only constitute a ...Jump to post
CNN just reported but won't verify that there was live ammo on set. Apparently the crew did something with this ammo on their own time with a game they played or something along the lines of target shooting or something. Nothing to do with the Movie. Wow. I read that too, plus the Assistant Directo...Jump to post
M564038 wrote:For those who haven't registered this tidbit, McCarthy's right hand man during those proceedings, were later a mentor for Donald Trump. You can't make these things up.
Yikes, that’s one scary drive! Flashbacks to Tacoma Narrows.Jump to post
It’s true, sarcasm is lost on the dull and humorless.
I never said there was any comparison OTHER THAN the basic rules of safe gun handling. It would harm no one to have armorers show actors the status of any firearms, not just affirm it’s safe by saying “cold gun”. Trust and verify.
Maybe he should get lessons from Michelek
I thought it fit nicely into the Craig saga. I am a bit younger so Casino Royale was the first Bond I saw in theatres. Having seen all the older movies I can understand why this film in particular might be too "human". That being said, I enjoyed it but would have hoped for a happy ending....Jump to post
We could easily get to #2– take a real gun of the correct appearance, put a custom cylinder that has small chambers holding a very small (.22 Short) cartridges that make enough noise. The cylinder could not chamber a live round. Hamilton Bowen and others do custom work on revolvers to change the cal...Jump to post
It’s designed into the planes, called center wing tanks. Fuel is also stored in some stabs, B747 for example. We had a 2200# fuel tank about 3 feet from the recorders in a Global.
A gear up landing would be done with the CWT empty
BUT, he should not have been pointing the weapon at anyone. I'm sure Hollywood has figured out camera angels to make it appear that someone is point the gun at another person when in fact they are not. He should have never been pointing that weapon at anyone, period. You obviously have not seen man...Jump to post
The Armorer was there to make sure it was a prop instead of a weapon. The armorer won’t bear the guilt of shooting the DP, Baldwin will. No but they will bear the guilty of failing in their responsibilities that allowed it to happen. Baldwin will have his own guilt on this, but he was told by the p...Jump to post
This wasn't supposed to be a weapon. It was supposed to be a prop, and it was checked, by the person paid to provide the prop. They declared it cold. Probably without checking themselves, to a person whose responsibility was not to fire a weapon, but to act on that info. There are multiple failures...Jump to post
You haven’t handed me the load sheet! I’ve corrected a few loadmasters over the years who made an innocent mistake or miscommunication. A better comparison than the silly idea of pilots checking attachment bolts or me checking the hidden house wiring is pilots checking the take-off data. Despite the...Jump to post
Sporty on the ground, too.
https://twitter.com/bayareafire343/stat ... 87397?s=12
Might seem obvious, but: Your dad don’t make the rules. Things simply can’t work that way when making a movie. The actors perform, all that other junk needs to go somewhere else. What else should the actor check? That the cameras a REALLY rolling? That the boom mic doesn’t distort and the sampling ...Jump to post
I just don't get why there was a real weapon on the set. In Europe all weapons are totally neutralised and unable to fire a real bullet . I’m sure there are clever gunsmiths that could render any firearm to only shoot blanks. Modify the chamber so only special cartridges for blanks fit. Hamilton Bo...Jump to post
Yes, rarely can happen; odds compared to a negligent discharge are millions to one.Jump to post
In the instant case, one actor pointed the gun at a person irrelevant to the scene being filmed and pulled the trigger. The End. If you don't know anything about a film set, how can it be claimed persons were irrelevant to the scene being filmed? :scratchchin: Perhaps, because I’d expect the cinema...Jump to post
There are millions of desirable ICE vehicles ready to be restored and driven. I know of several restorers that can deliver a virtually new 1994 W124 Mercedes. I’m not driving an EV any time soon. I can’t imagine sitting 10 km/hr Mumbai traffic with the AC going full blast to keep the smells, humidit...Jump to post
What I don't understand is that those people hit were behind a monitor not behind the camera. If that was the preferred angle to aim the gun for picture, why wasn't the monitor on the other side of the camera. Oh well, we will get the answers later. It's obvious that you have little or no real worl...Jump to post
I find it humorous that the antigunners are defending Baldwin saying he didn't know any better and the progunners are saying he should've. THS214--guns just don't go off by themselves. The trigger has to be pulled. With this being an old western, in most probability, this was a single action revolv...Jump to post
No, of course not. I don’t try to wire new outlets in my house for a reason—I don’t know how to do so and comply with code. If I did wire something and burn the house, I have only myself to blame and accept the consequences. So you don’t check the wiring of the contractor before using it even when ...Jump to post
No, of course not. I don’t try to wire new outlets in my house for a reason—I don’t know how to do so and comply with code. If I did wire something and burn the house, I have only myself to blame and accept the consequences. Protecting people from their own folly produces a society of idiots, so fa...Jump to post
No, of course not. I don’t try to wire new outlets in my house for a reason—I don’t know how to do so and comply with code. If I did wire something and burn the house, I have only myself to blame and accept the consequences. Protecting people from their own folly produces a society of idiots, so far...Jump to post
It is indeed curious isn’t it. I wonder how something as inherently dangerous as electricity and it’s complex system design, installation and maintenance could become so safe so as to not need special training dished out by enthusiasts to be used safely, some mysteries can never be solved I guess. ...Jump to post
Boeing757100 wrote:And no, this is not a "Pilotless plane vs Piloted plane" thread, this is one where there is one human and one AI.
I’m sure the event will attract plenty of rich, self-important types in their private jets to discuss the climate. If the ramp attracts too much interest, they’ll direct the crews to fly empty to various locations, only to burn more fuel, create more pollution. Been there, done that. I was flying fo...Jump to post
Do you think that all actors should carry a multimeter to check the electrical safety of any switches they need to use during filming? I mean it’s pretty obvious that electricity is dangerous right? Fred Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk That’s a irrelevant argument. You don’t know check your power ...Jump to post
You're in the military. He's an actor. Actually, I was in the military but I learned gun safety at the tender age of about 6. It should be obvious that a gun is dangerous, that pulling the trigger will make it fire, if it’s loaded, and the outcome will be harmful to what it’s pointed at. There is Z...Jump to post
You're all talking about guns as in the weapons designed to kill someone. But this is a movie set, where nothing is at it seems. For all we know Baldwin might have thought the gun wasn't a real one. As flipdewaf suggested plenty of dangerous things are present on a movie set, and accidents happen a...Jump to post
Hand me an open gun and verify its status, hand me closed one, be it a derringer or a howitzer, I’m gonna instinctively open it and check. What are they these amateurs? You're in the military. He's an actor. Actually, I was in the military but I learned gun safety at the tender age of about 6. It s...Jump to post
Yes with a person holding a gun who didn’t take care to se that it was unloaded.Jump to post
Using contract pilots is already being investigated courtesy of the Tahoe accident. Lots of issues there—vetting, training standards, CRM, knowledge of the operations. An MD-87 looks cheap to buy, but the cost of operating is likely beyond the airline’s costs, it’s still an expensive plane. A $60 mi...Jump to post