Re: Rejected photos?

airkas1 wrote:

Alex, I just replied to you in the other thread.

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

1) Wow! I just see familiar white aircraft in blue square at browser address bar and tabs instead of strange paper plane! :shock: UPDATE: now it shows only till page is loaded :cry: then back to paper plane :evil: 2) As developers ask to post examples of old URL not working, will they make old patte...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Kas, thank you for working hard trying to cool down Anetgate :mrgreen: As an answer on Any chance you or the guy could post examples please. can somebody check how ID: 2838333 and ID: 2844207 for example looks like for screeners? Also can somebody check sizes of JPG files of this and 2838315 (which ...

Re: Rejected photos?

The way I read it, rejected photos don't have their filename changed. So to clarify - photos in the queue have the filenames changed, but once they are rejected they revert back to the filename they were uploaded with? No. Photo name changed at upload to match photo id and then never changed again ...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Okey, so I uploaded 15 photos before "A.nexit" and already get 10 of them rejected. I doesn't look much on reasons because I was unable to check how this photos looks like on the site - I just saw them terribly compressed and washed out of colors and contrast on previews and trying to look...

Re: Stop the complaining about the upgraded site... please!

Dear Airliners Crew, ... One can only hope that the crew at '2nd best' jetphotos.net keep their heads cool and just wait and see. Unfortunately at this current point in time, it's not possible to sign up for a JP Elite account. Please note that JetPhotos.net has been purchased by Flightradar24.com ...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

I'm not quite getting the problem here... If I look in the site's source code (it's public, so yeah why not? you're not hiding something here), I see this: <meta name="author" content="SiteSplat www.sitesplat.com"> <meta name="designer" content="SiteSplat www.site...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

The building inspector comes to your old, dated house to give it a once-over. Although the styling is a little dated, it's also classically beautiful and functional. However, the inspector discovers structural problems with your house; which although is only causing minor dips in the floor now, cou...

Re: New Site.

There are internal conversations occurring right this minute regarding a change back to a more familiar color scheme. In those conversations are also a reduction of blank space and a return to a more familiar, compact layout in certain areas. While I can't guarantee that, I do in fact think those c...

Re: New Site.

Let us just compare it with what we will see in a week...

Re: New Site.

Ok, this new site is totally mobile version and touch screen friendly. May be you can allow photos from iPhones and Samsungs into queue then?

Re: Joint Airport Operations Of Civil & Military Aircr

In Russia at least half a dozen really big airports are shared between civil and military operations: https://goo.gl/D9Vzlt Moreover, since 20th of June famous Zhukovsky/Ramenskoe test airfield will be shared between test and civil operations! BTW, civil part is operated by Lithuanian company "...

Re: New Site.

airkas1 wrote:

oldannyboy wrote:

And to add insult to injury I cannot post any kind of photo for my profile

Most upper right corner --> sign in --> settings --> upper box wil allow you to upload a profile photo. --> scroll all the way down --> click save.

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

All very well, perhaps, had there been an effort to bring a swathe of users into the revamp or to announce in advance where the site was heading. OK, now I can formulated what's wrong with whole look there. This is just mobile version of A.net - m.airliners.net - which I get any time I open Airline...

Re: New Site.

Kas, simple question: where is core service for photographer? Page with photo at it's original size, unchanged, not up- or downscaled, not recompressed, with all information about airliner, with photographer name and with ability for providing link to it for outside use? The developers are still wo...

Re: New Site.

I can see that photographers voice are thin and low priority. Maybe lower in numbers but at the very least equal in voice. Trust me on that one. Kas, simple question: where is core service for photographer? Page with photo at it's original size, unchanged, not up- or downscaled, not recompressed, w...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

zkeye wrote:

fhrx wrote:

Just as a side; why did paid membership cease? I'm happy to pay for a good service;

It would appear that a good service is no longer offered.

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

You just have to watch users Online ...17 ? it never has been that low... ome on A.net thats not what you want create here ? I first found this page in 1997 and become an member 1999 ! and since that I was visiting this Page nearly every day !!!! It was one of the fun Pages on the Internet ! Search...

Re: New Site.

I see a majority of people replaying to site change are forum browsers and forum users. I can see that photographers voice are thin and low priority.

Re: New Site.

robbby66 wrote:

SpaceDiva wrote:

It is not your age....

Thank you SpaceDiva....... for your contribution.....I could not write it better !!

Re: Stop the complaining about the upgraded site... please!

Dear Team Members! Please not hide behind DM backs and not stress that your work is unpaid! You definitely was part of beta-testing team. You definitely saw what "new design" will looks like for contributors, i.e. photographers. You definitely know that screeneing process at this site does...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Did anyone believe that photo part of upgrade - photos loose aspect ratio, photos get upsized larger than original size, inability to edit or delete queued photos - was tested and was OK until "site became live"? Sorry guys, I don't know how much did you paid for this redesign but it's def...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

How can I now remove my photos from the site?

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

I can't stress more - it WAS photo site, not forum site nor social network. Without photo part which is now TOTALY BROKEN - why we need go through painfull screeneing process to post to site which resize your photo and compress it worse then flickr - this will became just another forum with couple d...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Wow, waaay too much complaining about something we aren't really paying for. Really? Isn't photographers "pay" for this because they are one and sole reason why this site exist at all? Forums, chats, advertising - all this stuff rides on back of photo horse, because Anet was Aircraft Phot...

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

All links to photos from "old Anet" are dead. You can't see your own photo in right aspect and in full size. At the same time anybody can download your photos free of charge without watermark and in any size. Thanks, Demand Media.

Re: Re:

airkas1 wrote:

kulverstukas wrote:

but this awful page of photo, with broken aspect ratio and with arrows which scale photo to fit screen breaking

The developers are aware of this and a fix is in the pipelines.

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

I don't care about forums and stuff, but this awful page of photo, with broken aspect ratio and with arrows which scale photo to fit screen breaking it's aspect even more - like on cheap TV set...

Do we need some crossbreeding between faecesbook and flickr?

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Oh my God! It's worst thing I seen in decades!

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/angad84" class="quote" target="_blank">angad84</a> (<a href="#83" class="quote">Reply 83</a>):<br/><i>If you don't try to get this up - at ANY s...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/Kaphias" class="quote" target="_blank">Kaphias</a> (<a href="#94" class="quote">Reply 94</a>):<br/><i>but completely distracted...</i></font></t...

RE: Heat Haze

Another trick (if you can't be closer or shoot in winter) is to use as slow shutter speed as possible.

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/Kaphias" class="quote" target="_blank">Kaphias</a> (<a href="#92" class="quote">Reply 92</a>):<br/><i>don't seem to be actively involved in anyt...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Thanks, Angad and Kas! Just to clarify, such shoots are not for Anet too because of people? <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190998.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190998.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/...

RE: An-225's First India Visit

Can I suggest to use gradient filter to lower exposure on bottom of the picture a bit or will it be accounted as digital manipulating?

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190943.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190943.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190943.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplanes.net/images/to191000/190943.jp...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Motivewize this kind is no go to? <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189651.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189651.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189651.jpg" width="650" height="493" alt="http://russianpl...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Are such photos (with ladders) motive relected? <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189682.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189682.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189682.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="ht...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/spompert" class="quote" target="_blank">spompert</a> (<a href="#80" class="quote">Reply 80</a>):<br/><i>I guess with such photos there will be s...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

I think this one don't worth trying even at 1024? <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189419.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189419.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to190000/189419.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Blurry, grainy, soft, quality? <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188748.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188748.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188748.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplane...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

OK. Thanks. Seems it's still to early to return.

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Just checking if my photos still of so terrible quality... <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188668.jpg" target="_blank"><img border=0 src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188668.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplanes.net/images/to189000/188668.jpg" border="...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Motive is enough  <img src="http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/graphics/smilies/wink.gif" width="15" height="15" border="0"/> Any chances of recent shoots (terrible heat haze still here)  <img src="http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/graphics/smilies/frown.gif" width="15...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

Just of curiosity... <a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186919.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186919.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186919.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplanes.net/imag...

RE: Losing My Mind A Little

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/notaxonrotax" class="quote" target="_blank">notaxonrotax</a> (<a href="#18" class="quote">Reply 18</a>):<br/><i>Just for a giggle......appeal it...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186774.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186774.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186774.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186774.jp...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<table border="0" align="CENTER" width="95%" class="quote"><tr><td><font size="2" face="ARIAL, Helvetica, Geneva" color="#9A9DA0">Quoting <a href="/profile/airkas1" class="quote" target="_blank">airkas1</a> (<a href="#62" class="quote">Reply 62</a>):<br/><i>Slightly blurry. </i></font></td></tr></ta...

RE: Is It Anet Worthy 2016?

<a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186772.jpg" target="_blank"/><a href="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186772.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186772.jpg" width="650" height="439" alt="http://russianplanes.net/images/to187000/186772.jp...

RE: Pre/Pro Screening 2016

Which editing program do you use? You don't need to boost overall brightness on the shoot, but push up shadows a bit.

PS at reference photo overall brightness is the same as on shoot in question, but shadows are lighted so it was passable.