Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
pune
Topic Author
Posts: 1452
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:18 am

Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sat May 21, 2022 7:13 pm

Just saw this -

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202205/1266116.shtml

It feels whiny what the NASA gentleman said. Even if we take his statement at face value that doesn't tell why the U.S. isn't looking at a better lunar base or whatever. Instead of blaming China, it would have been far better to share what NASA will be doing.

What sadly was not discussed is that NASA has been defunded right after the U.S. won the space race.

https://www.eclipseaviation.com/why-was-nasa-defunded/

The current POTUS, to his credit has requested more funding for NASA. Let's see what happens.
 
Avatar2go
Posts: 572
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:41 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sat May 21, 2022 7:27 pm

This is mostly political rhetoric. Chinese technological espionage is well documented. The US wants to cooperate but is wary of the theft of IP. So the two have not been able to agree.

That doesn't mean that the Chinese have not made great progress on their own, or will not continue to do so. But the US will not cede their technological edge, so the two are destined to compete in the future.
 
IADFCO
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 4:20 pm

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sat May 21, 2022 7:33 pm

It goes without saying that the Global Times reflects 100% the views of the Chinese Communist Party.

I don't know whether China steals technology (although I have a pretty good idea). However, I'm familiar with the technical literature in flight control systems, and I still have to see a landmark Chinese contribution. Some of their papers are good, some are very good, but never have I felt "wow, they finally cracked problem X that we have been trying to solve for years". Maybe they have, but are not telling, who knows.

Space may be a different story, I don't know, it's not my area.
 
ReverseFlow
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:40 pm

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sun May 22, 2022 2:38 pm

I remember reading about or seeing a Youtube video with Elon Musk who said that SpaceX don't publish patents.
The reasoning behind this was that their biggest 'rival' was a state sponsored space program who doesn't care for patents. And especially if they use them militarily you wouldn't find out.
 
Avatar2go
Posts: 572
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:41 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sun May 22, 2022 3:24 pm

ReverseFlow wrote:
I remember reading about or seeing a Youtube video with Elon Musk who said that SpaceX don't publish patents.
The reasoning behind this was that their biggest 'rival' was a state sponsored space program who doesn't care for patents. And especially if they use them militarily you wouldn't find out.


Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.
 
texl1649
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:38 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sun May 22, 2022 3:41 pm

Avatar2go wrote:
ReverseFlow wrote:
I remember reading about or seeing a Youtube video with Elon Musk who said that SpaceX don't publish patents.
The reasoning behind this was that their biggest 'rival' was a state sponsored space program who doesn't care for patents. And especially if they use them militarily you wouldn't find out.


Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.


That substantively changed a few years ago.

https://insights.greyb.com/spacex-patents/

Remember, a patent is in essence a (temporary or 20 year or so) ‘right to exclude’ others in exchange for public disclosure of the device/technology/method. Some things, if no one else gets to touch it/see how it really works (like the Raptor V2 engines only SpaceX is using themselves), might make sense not to reveal publicly to the Chinese, but I think over time SpaceX’ team has realized they need legal protections not just from the Chinese who will steal anything anyway, but other competitors.
 
ReverseFlow
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:40 pm

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Sun May 22, 2022 8:49 pm

texl1649 wrote:
Avatar2go wrote:
ReverseFlow wrote:
I remember reading about or seeing a Youtube video with Elon Musk who said that SpaceX don't publish patents.
The reasoning behind this was that their biggest 'rival' was a state sponsored space program who doesn't care for patents. And especially if they use them militarily you wouldn't find out.


Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.


That substantively changed a few years ago.

https://insights.greyb.com/spacex-patents/

Remember, a patent is in essence a (temporary or 20 year or so) ‘right to exclude’ others in exchange for public disclosure of the device/technology/method. Some things, if no one else gets to touch it/see how it really works (like the Raptor V2 engines only SpaceX is using themselves), might make sense not to reveal publicly to the Chinese, but I think over time SpaceX’ team has realized they need legal protections not just from the Chinese who will steal anything anyway, but other competitors.
Ah thanks. But the last sentence says:

"Thus, so far SpaceX is not filing patents for its core technology"
So they are obviously still trying to keep some info away from the competition and especially Chinese.
 
AngMoh
Posts: 1204
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:03 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Mon May 23, 2022 12:28 am

texl1649 wrote:
Avatar2go wrote:
ReverseFlow wrote:
I remember reading about or seeing a Youtube video with Elon Musk who said that SpaceX don't publish patents.
The reasoning behind this was that their biggest 'rival' was a state sponsored space program who doesn't care for patents. And especially if they use them militarily you wouldn't find out.


Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.


That substantively changed a few years ago.

https://insights.greyb.com/spacex-patents/

Remember, a patent is in essence a (temporary or 20 year or so) ‘right to exclude’ others in exchange for public disclosure of the device/technology/method. Some things, if no one else gets to touch it/see how it really works (like the Raptor V2 engines only SpaceX is using themselves), might make sense not to reveal publicly to the Chinese, but I think over time SpaceX’ team has realized they need legal protections not just from the Chinese who will steal anything anyway, but other competitors.


A patent is only valid for the country it is filed in. The exception is the EU where there is a EU wide patenting system. A US patent is only valid in the US. If the same patent has not been filed in other countries, it is not protected in the other countries. So if you file a patent in the US and nowhere else, then you are free to use that patent in sales in Australia for example.

A well written patent protects a lot, stops competition and does not tell a competitor anything about your product. GE for example, is very good in that. A poorly written patent tells too much, and not only explains how it is implemented but enables competitors to bypass a patent.

We used to file patents in the US, EU, China and Australia as they were the biggest markets. We also has a line of products which infringed on a GE patent, but that patent was only valid in the US. That product was sold everywhere in the world except the US, where we sold an older system. Later, we developed a newer line of products that no longer infringed on the GE patent and that one became the default product worldwide.

So Space-X can file all they want in the US, it does not give any protection whatsoever in China. It only protects against Jeff Bezos.
 
Avatar2go
Posts: 572
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2022 3:41 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Mon May 23, 2022 2:33 am

AngMoh wrote:
texl1649 wrote:
Avatar2go wrote:

Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.


That substantively changed a few years ago.

https://insights.greyb.com/spacex-patents/

Remember, a patent is in essence a (temporary or 20 year or so) ‘right to exclude’ others in exchange for public disclosure of the device/technology/method. Some things, if no one else gets to touch it/see how it really works (like the Raptor V2 engines only SpaceX is using themselves), might make sense not to reveal publicly to the Chinese, but I think over time SpaceX’ team has realized they need legal protections not just from the Chinese who will steal anything anyway, but other competitors.


A patent is only valid for the country it is filed in. The exception is the EU where there is a EU wide patenting system. A US patent is only valid in the US. If the same patent has not been filed in other countries, it is not protected in the other countries. So if you file a patent in the US and nowhere else, then you are free to use that patent in sales in Australia for example.

A well written patent protects a lot, stops competition and does not tell a competitor anything about your product. GE for example, is very good in that. A poorly written patent tells too much, and not only explains how it is implemented but enables competitors to bypass a patent.

We used to file patents in the US, EU, China and Australia as they were the biggest markets. We also has a line of products which infringed on a GE patent, but that patent was only valid in the US. That product was sold everywhere in the world except the US, where we sold an older system. Later, we developed a newer line of products that no longer infringed on the GE patent and that one became the default product worldwide.

So Space-X can file all they want in the US, it does not give any protection whatsoever in China. It only protects against Jeff Bezos.


I think the issue is that China does not fairly enforce (respect) the law when it comes to infringement by domestic companies. Infringement goes on fairly freely without consequence, even when the patents are filed in China.

https://www.iam-media.com/litigation/wh ... y-in-china
 
texl1649
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:38 am

Re: Chinese aerospace experts slam NASA's chief for 'ridiculous and outrageous' allegations of 'stealing' technology

Mon May 23, 2022 10:59 am

AngMoh wrote:
texl1649 wrote:
Avatar2go wrote:

Other reasons are the expense of researching earlier patents, the limited protection they offer (China, for example, does not respect Western patent law), and the cost of litigation for infringement. Elon's view is that continuous innovation is a better protection overall.


That substantively changed a few years ago.

https://insights.greyb.com/spacex-patents/

Remember, a patent is in essence a (temporary or 20 year or so) ‘right to exclude’ others in exchange for public disclosure of the device/technology/method. Some things, if no one else gets to touch it/see how it really works (like the Raptor V2 engines only SpaceX is using themselves), might make sense not to reveal publicly to the Chinese, but I think over time SpaceX’ team has realized they need legal protections not just from the Chinese who will steal anything anyway, but other competitors.


A patent is only valid for the country it is filed in. The exception is the EU where there is a EU wide patenting system. A US patent is only valid in the US. If the same patent has not been filed in other countries, it is not protected in the other countries. So if you file a patent in the US and nowhere else, then you are free to use that patent in sales in Australia for example.

A well written patent protects a lot, stops competition and does not tell a competitor anything about your product. GE for example, is very good in that. A poorly written patent tells too much, and not only explains how it is implemented but enables competitors to bypass a patent.

We used to file patents in the US, EU, China and Australia as they were the biggest markets. We also has a line of products which infringed on a GE patent, but that patent was only valid in the US. That product was sold everywhere in the world except the US, where we sold an older system. Later, we developed a newer line of products that no longer infringed on the GE patent and that one became the default product worldwide.

So Space-X can file all they want in the US, it does not give any protection whatsoever in China. It only protects against Jeff Bezos.


The patent cooperation treaty really changed how the calculus about where to file comes out for a lot of companies/products. PCT member countries mean you can file in the US and get the EU/much of Asia protection referenced.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: par13del and 17 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos