What I said is not an opinion--it is a well known fact that Lance indeed spends most of his season in preparation for the Tour. Not saying that other riders don't, but they intend to win other races
G-VIIB, I agree that it is a fact that
LA's main focus is the TdF but he is intent on winning other races.
1999
1st Circuit de la Sathe
TT
2nd Amstel Gold
8th Dauphine Libere
2000
2nd Paris Camembert
3rd Dauphine Libere
3rd Classique des Alps
2001
2nd Amstel Gold
1st Tour of Switzerland
2002
2nd Criterium International
4th Amstel Gold
1st Midi Libere
1st Dauphine Libere
2nd Criterium Internationale
2003
8th Amstel Gold
1st Dauphine Libere
2004
1st Tour de Georgia
4th Dauphine Libere
3rd Criterium Internationale
Hard to believe these are the results of someone who doesn't intend to win races other than the TdF. It's really impressive when you consider he isn't peaking during most of these races and is competing against many riders who peak during the spring.
Also found some interesting stuff at the UCI site.
http://www.uci.ch/modello2.asp?1stlevelid=C&level1=1&level2=5
The last points ranking before the TdF clearly shows no advantage to Ullrich in results.
Armstrong Ullrich Hamilton
1999 12th-1226pts 26th-976pts
2000 4-1570 3-1602
2001 1-2098 8-1702
2002 3-1841 6-1480 64-543
2003 N/A N/A N/A
2004 7-1592 9-1437 16-1159
2004 ytd 34-554 36-522 15-720
Sorry the table didn't end up formatted like I wanted it to but it's close.
I couldn't find figures for 2003. The 2004 ytd are for the period beginning 01-01-04 to present.
Considering that there is a 125 point difference between 1st and 2nd at a grand tour(1st being 500 pts and 2nd being 375) when you eliminate the TdF from the points standings there is a virtual tie between the two riders except for 1999 as
LA didn't compete in the '98 TdF yet led
JU considerably despite
JU winning the '98 TdF. Your statement in regards to
JU racing more races and being a more well rounded rider than
LA is false. They are in the same category of TdF specialists and due to their supreme fitness and talent they win some other races too. They are both guilty of focusing on the TdF at the expense of longer flatter season. BTW The above numbers bode well for Hamilton to have a good tour.
Back when a rider could dominate the whole season everybody followed the same approach to the season. Now we have riders who realize that they will never have a chance to win a grand tour so they peak early and concentrate on the classics and world cup. They then can peak again around World Championships time. Someone who peaks for TdF is pretty much limited to one peak a year as it is in the middle of the season rather than the beginning or end. The maximum time that an endurance athlete can peak is 6-8 weeks. With different athletes peaking at different times of a 6+month competition season you can't expect an athlete to dominate all season long.
I'm tired of people complaining that
LA is the only rider that concentrates on the TdF at the expense of all else. He is only one of many that do the same exact thing with one exception.......He does it better than anyone else.
BTW G-VIIB you are a very knowledgeable cycling fan for a 13-15 year old. I'm impressed. Do you ride? I noticed your profile says you run track.
Keep it up!
DL757md