Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 7:55 pm

Ran across the excellent interactive stie on TIME.com the other day, reviewing the battleground states in the upcoming election. Shows just how close the election REALLY is, and where the true key states are.

http://www.time.com/time/election2004/battleground/?cnn=yes

Even with the RNC coming up, I think you'll find, in a month from now, this map will look eerily similar.
 
User avatar
keesje
Posts: 14616
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:18 pm



People in agriculture / oil focussed states like Bush better?
 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:19 pm

Keesje, I thought of just posting the picture, but if you go to the site, you can actually go over each battleground, and read what's up with it. That's the fun part.  Smile
 
N6376M
Posts: 2310
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:54 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:23 pm

Keesje,

the midwest of the US has always been very conservative, while liberalism has always enjoyed support or both coasts.
 
Zweed
Posts: 435
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:31 pm

Yeah Right

Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:27 pm

you mean how close it is in the worlds biggest non-democratic election
 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:44 pm

Actually, N6376m, I don't think the midwest can be labled "conservative" It is MORE conservative than the coasts, no doubt, but it doesn't approach the conservatism of the deep South. The Midwest has alway been very centrist, with some conservative values, but also some liberal values as well. It is why it can be so unpredictable, and usually so key in any election.

And Zweed, there's nothing non-democratic about out elections at all. I think someone who hasn't lived here isn't exactly the best judge of our system.
 
User avatar
yyz717
Posts: 15781
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 12:26 pm

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:07 pm

you mean how close it is in the worlds biggest non-democratic election

Zweed is correct. The US is more of a 2-party dictatorship than a democracy. Every other Western nation has more than 2 parties regularly vying for power.

In the US, each of the 2 long established parties has about 47% PERMANENT support and they fight over the shifting 6% or so. This is not democracy.

 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:17 pm

I most heartily disagree with that assessment, Yyz717. The U.S. has never had more than two parties, and, if you look at the instability of some other democracies in the world, like France and Italy, with multiple parties, constant shifting in alliances and governments being voted down and elections being called quite often in the past, I don't have a problem with our system.

The biggest impediment to democracy in the U.S. is apathy: how so many do not exercise their Constitutional privelage to vote. And apathy also extends to being lazy and voting for a recognized, or an incumbent, and not doing any homework on what a candidate stands for.
 
slider
Posts: 7751
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 11:42 pm

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:54 pm

The biggest impediment to democracy in the U.S. is apathy: how so many do not exercise their Constitutional privelage to vote. And apathy also extends to being lazy and voting for a recognized, or an incumbent, and not doing any homework on what a candidate stands for.

Excellent point, Alpha1, and I'll go a step further.

The tendency to vote for the "lesser of two evils" has propogated this rampant runaway 2-party corrupt system even more. People need to not only vote--there are candidates out there for them if they just VOTE--but also vote their conscience, not a compromise based on what 2 hacks the major parties send up.

We'll get better candidates once we demand them. Period.

And as far as the Midwest, I used to characterize them as conservative, but when I consider the oppressive taxation, from personal income to exorbitant property taxes, not to mention the use of the term "progressive" in government, I run like hell.

 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:56 pm

And as far as the Midwest, I used to characterize them as conservative, but when I consider the oppressive taxation, from personal income to exorbitant property taxes, not to mention the use of the term "progressive" in government, I run like hell.

Oppressive taxation? What are you talking about? I pay taxes in a typical midwest area. No one likes them, but they certainly aren't "oppressive" in any manner. They don't keep anyone in this area from living a decent life. I think, unfortuantely, too many conservatives feel ANY tax is oppressive. But if one looks at the fact, in many areas, taxes aren't as oppressive as some would like to think.
 
N6376M
Posts: 2310
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:54 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 11:34 pm

The US 2 party system exists largely because of the structure of our government. The Western European parlimentary and prime minister system is more condusive to the formation and existence of minority parties because they can very often exert much greater influence on the major parties than their popular support would lead you to believe.

Take for example the US system. Let's assume that between 40 and 45% of the population is either going to vote for the Democrats or Republicans. This leaves about between 10% and 20% of the population as independents. If the people truly voted independent and didn't support one of the major parties, their votes would be at best meaningless and at worst counterproductive to their goal. Everyone knows that a vote for Nader is effectively a vote for Bush, the same way that a vote for Perot was a vote for Clinton.

In a parlimentary system, the leader has to be chose by an absolute majority of the MP's therefore, unless one party can gain a clear majority they must work with the other minority parties to establish a government. This is not the case in the US system.

I believe that the need to form coalition governments serves as a moderating influence to change as any very dramatic change in course could result in the splitting of the coalition and the fall of the government.
 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Fri Aug 27, 2004 11:42 pm

I would not mind seeing a third, centerest-type party in the U.S. I believe the two majors have become to beholden to the extreme elements in their respective parties-the GOP to the religious right, and the Democratic party to elements of the far-left.

I would love to see moderats in both parties, like McCain, Snowe, Zell Miller, and the like, get into centrist party, which would mitigate the power of the extremes.
 
N6376M
Posts: 2310
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:54 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 12:04 am

Alpha1, if a centerist party such as you described were running this year and was polling at 25%, would you still vote for them, knowing that such a vote would basically guarantee a GWB re-election?

I think that this is exactly the problem/impediment with the development of a two-party system in the US. A move from no support to a quarter of the country would be huge in just one election cycle. Unfortunately 25% of the popular vote doesn't get you anything.

We need enough of the country to be willing to waste their vote in one election to have any hopes of developing a viable 3rd party. The risk is, that once the 3rd party starts to gain support, the other two move back towards the center in an attempt to siphon away the middle's support.
 
Boeing7E7
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 9:35 pm

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 1:41 am

you mean how close it is in the worlds biggest non-democratic election

Zweed is correct. The US is more of a 2-party dictatorship than a democracy. Every other Western nation has more than 2 parties regularly vying for power.

In the US, each of the 2 long established parties has about 47% PERMANENT support and they fight over the shifting 6% or so. This is not democracy.


Both of you are incredibly misguided. We live in a Republic not a Democracy and use a representative Democracy system. The President does not hold all the power and check and balances are provided by the Legislative and Judicial branch. While we may not get the President we desire, we have a secondary voice in our local representatives which keep him/her in check. Many of whom are Independents.
 
Superfly
Posts: 37705
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:16 am

Here is an even more accurate site that's updated daily.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com
 
StevenUhl777
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 11:02 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:07 am

I'd absolutely vote for a centrist party candidate if they ran, just to send a message to both parties...

 
Superfly
Posts: 37705
Joined: Thu May 11, 2000 8:01 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 4:08 am

StevenUhl777:
That would be John Kerry.
Kerry isn't running on a leftist platform.
 
Alpha 1
Topic Author
Posts: 12343
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 12:12 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 12:41 pm

Superfly, that's a very detailed site. Thanks for sharing it with us.
 
j_hallgren
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2000 11:48 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:25 pm

Glad to see that someone else knows that it's a REPUBLIC and not a democracy...many people have forgotten that aspect...mostly the Democrats! That's why they keep trying to convince people that Gore won in 2000...because of the popular vote which means squat...its the electoral vote that counts...


And in the Pledge, we say 'and to the republic for which it stands' not the democrary...
 
rsmith6621a
Posts: 1508
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:21 pm

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:36 pm



Great find Alpha1........Thanks.....I hope to have some John Kerry images tommorow
 
L-188
Posts: 29881
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 1999 11:27 am

RE: Interactive Site On The "Battleground" States

Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:42 pm

Kerry isn't running on a leftist platform.

Compared to who Superfly?

Karl Marx?

Kerry's congressional voting record has been show to be left of even Teddy's.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aesma, ltbewr, Majestic-12 [Bot], Paars, WildcatYXU and 19 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos