Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Cragley (Thread starter): With the release of the MIEV next year as well as new products from Honda, Toyota etc, would you consider buying an electric car? |
Quoting Cragley (Thread starter): would you consider buying an electric car? |
Quoting Elite (Reply 4): Nope - at least not now. This is the same reason why I don't go line up for the first iPod or iPhone or tech gadget - I want it to be tested and used so the basic bugs are found and fixed before I buy one. |
Quoting Elite (Reply 4): Nope - at least not now. This is the same reason why I don't go line up for the first iPod or iPhone or tech gadget - I want it to be tested and used so the basic bugs are found and fixed before I buy one. |
Quoting Aviation (Reply 3): Only thing that bugs me at the moment is well, bugs.. the current hybrids are just plain buggy |
Quote: A car powered by an internal combustion engine at 20% efficiency, getting 8 L/100 km (30 mpg), will require (8.9*8)*0.20 = 14.2 kW·h/100 km. At a cost of $1/L, 8 L/100 km is $8 per 100 km. A battery electric version of that same car with a charge/discharge efficiency of 81%, and charged at a cost of $0.10 for kW·h would cost (14.2/0.81)*0.10 = $1.75 per 100 km, or would be paying the equivalent of $0.22/L. Other inefficiencies in an ICE not present in electric cars can further reduce these costs. The Tesla uses about 13 kW·h/100 km, the EV1 used about 11 kW·h/100 km |
Quote: A 55% to 99.9% improvement in CO2 emissions takes place when driving an EV over an ICE (gasoline, diesel) vehicle depending on the source of electricity. |
Quote: New lithium-ion battery-equipped EVs provide 400–500 km (250–300 mi) of range per charge. |
Quoting Planesarecool (Reply 9): I'd buy one of these if I had £55,000 to blow: |
Quoting Fr8mech (Reply 12): Right now both my vehicles are paid off. Between my wife and I, we spend about $130 in gas every 10 days or so. |
Quoting Fr8mech (Reply 12): My vehicles currently have a range of about 350 miles and 400 miles per tank. I'd want a replacement that at least comes close to that. |
Quoting Fr8mech (Reply 12): I'll consider it when the time comes to replace my 11 year old Explorer |
Quoting Aa757first (Reply 14): Just something I was wondering about plug-in cars. As it is now, when the power grid is overloaded (usually in the afternoon on hot days), we sometimes see rolling blackouts. Can our electrical infrastructure handle a significant number of people charging their electric vehicles? |
Quoting StarAC17 (Reply 15): The big issue for me is the charging time which is several hours and even if you take very few long trips greater than the range it is a big problem. |
Quoting Flighty (Reply 16): You could have a 100 mile "runabout" and a gas vehicle for road trips... at least for most households that works out nicely. |
Quoting Analog (Reply 7): Really? I you believe Consumer Reports, the Prius is one of the most reliable cars on the road. For all its faults, the car reliability figures they provide are pretty reliable (pardon the pun). |
Quoting NA (Reply 8): But the Prius is ugly, not exactly cheap and in most circumstances no less thirsty than other cars. Also I doubt that the technical complexity will be in favour of longterm reliability. I don´t understand the hype around it anyway, as obviously do most of my countrymen. A Prius is as rare as a Ferrari here. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 20): Electric cars don't get the mileage I need and only transfer the pollution from the exhaust pipe to the power plant. |
Quoting Flighty (Reply 16):
$5000 / yr after taxes on gasoline is quite a bit. A plug-in vehicle or something similar could probably pay for itself in your case. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 17):
Hmm if you got 11 years out of it, it's probably time to replace it soon! I had a '96 Explorer that I got 8 years and 140k miles out of, and then pretty much everything crapped out at once. |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): I just don't think the technology is quite there yet |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): My concern is infra-structure to support such a move. |
Quoting NA (Reply 21): I get my electrical power from a supplier who distributes only energy "created" from water, wind and sun. No coal, no nuclear energy, no oil, no gas. I don´t pay a penny more than before. Kick the big monopolist stranglers in the butt! |
Quoting StarAC17 (Reply 15): Also another possible solution to keep the battery charged would be to use a small wind turbine (a huge eyesore) or solar cells (only will work when sunny) on the roof to constantly charge the battery. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 20): Electric cars don't get the mileage I need and only transfer the pollution from the exhaust pipe to the power plant. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 10): A 55% to 99.9% improvement in CO2 emissions takes place when driving an EV over an ICE (gasoline, diesel) vehicle depending on the source of electricity. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 20): Besides that, automakers such as GM, Honda, Ford, and BMW are working on and making some progress with hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, though that technology also has issues, such as making and storing the hydrogen (and the amount of energy input necessary). |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 30): IMHO it's better at one power plant instead of thousands of exaust pipes. I guess you may have not seen this: Quoting Revelation (Reply 10): A 55% to 99.9% improvement in CO2 emissions takes place when driving an EV over an ICE (gasoline, diesel) vehicle depending on the source of electricity. Bottom line is less CO2 and other pollutants in the air we breathe. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 30): IMHO I think we won't see hydrogen widely deployed, due to the cost of the infrastructure. Electricity is already widely deployed. |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): I'm not against the electric or hybrid. I just don't think the technology is quite there yet. |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): I'm still concerned about the added cost of utilities. If we all start plugging in...where will the power come from? More powerplants. |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): Anyone really think the current congress will allow more nuclearI? Please...even if they bow down to economics and reality...the moron enviro-nazis will do everything they can to stop ANY powerplant, whether it's nuclear, coal, oil, water or bean sprouts. |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 23): Let's pay attention to the law of unintended consequences when we answer this question: What happens when a large portion of the population adds an electric car to the grid? Who is going to pay to put all these extra outlets in public areas. Who pays for the electricity used (well, you can use a coin fed meter, I guess). My concern is infra-structure to support such a move. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 31): To me it's a case of "out of sight, out of mind". But the pollution is still there. That electricity has to come from somewhere. But the addage of there's no free lunch is applied to everything really. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 33): Not many of us see the energy used to drill for oil, transport it to refineries, refine it, pipeline it to distibution hubs, truck it to gas stations, etc. All of these are producing pollution as well. As an engineer I can tell you anti-pollution is more effictive at one big power plant instead of thousands of individual cars. Not to mention the car isn't having to carry around the catalytic converter everywhere it goes. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 33): Yes, it'd be metered, just like no one gives you gas for free. Probably have a credit card swipe. But again it'd be best if everyone charged at night where there's all that excess capacity. |
Quoting EMBQA (Reply 32): Just wait until it comes to to replace your battery packs........!!! Cheaper my butt...... |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 34): Not arguing with you about pollution from the production of oil, but for the amount of energy we put in, we still get more out of fossil fuels. That's one hard reality that has kept us wed to hydrocarbons unfortunately. Either way, for a power plant, let's say coal fired, you need to mine the coal, process it, then transport it to be burned. It's not just at the power plant. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 34): And while cleaner, if an electric car is still limited in range and has to frequently recharge on long trips, then the practicality just isn't there. Plus it's not just emissions pollution. Don't forget disposal of the vehicle. The chemicals in today's cars are bad enough. Now we've got battery acids. |
Quoting Boeing4ever (Reply 34): No one said it would be easy... |
Quoting Fr8Mech (Reply 35): A portion of society, me included (unfortunately), would be charging during the day. Probably not enough to strain the grid but who knows. We already deal with rolling brown/blackouts in the summer. I just don't think the power infrastructure can support a mass migration at this point. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 36): Yep, energy density of fossil fuels is very good. That's what allows you to drive around in a car that's ony 15% or so efficient. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 36): Well, I don't think gasoline powered cars will disappear overnight. I guess I don't take enough long car trips to worry much about range, once we get to 200 miles range I'm good. If I'd ever need to take a longer trip, I'd rent a gasoline powered car. |
Quoting Revelation (Reply 10): The cynic in me says the plugs will be metered so the cost of the electricity is elevated to that of gasoline, so the electic companies can make as much profit as possible. Hey, it works for Exxon-Mobil! Let's hope this doesn't happen. |
Quoting NA (Reply 8): But the Prius is ugly, not exactly cheap and in most circumstances no less thirsty than other cars. Also I doubt that the technical complexity will be in favour of longterm reliability. I don´t understand the hype around it anyway, as obviously do most of my countrymen. A Prius is as rare as a Ferrari here. |