Here's a picture of the ol' girl I trained on.

A Cessna 180
Cal

Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Ronglimeng (Reply 3): I guess a C-180 is a pretty good plane to do a float endorsement with? I see a C-172 on floats outside my office window and its performance it kind of pathetic. |
Quoting Ronglimeng (Reply 3): So where do you go from here? Any chance of a job? |
Quoting DiamondFlyer (Reply 5): I've always been confused about this. In Canada, is it just an endorsement, similar to a complex/tailwheel/high performance endorsement here in the US, or is it another separate checkride? |
Quoting FighterPilot (Thread starter): Hey, the other day I acquired enough hours for my float plane conversion |
Quoting FighterPilot (Reply 6): It isn't just a single check ride. You have to have 7 hours on floats logged and of that 5 has to be dual and there has to be 5 solo takeoff and landings. |
Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 10): When one of your two floats touches the water surface before the other one, wouldn't there be a serious drag and reduction of speed on that one side of the airplane, slowing down that wing and speeding up the other wing, creating additional lift on the other wing, so the side that is still airborne will go up even higher, and in unfavorable circumstances make the plane flip? I know this is hardly a problem on wheeled airplanes landing on land, but for example on the glider we have to take extra care not to touch the ground with a wingtip while still at high speed, or especially at take-off when being towed, because it would slow down one wing, accelerate the other, and the extra lift on the faster wing will only make matters worse, potentially flipping the plane around. |
Quoting Birdwatching (Reply 10): |
Quoting FighterPilot (Thread starter): Hey, the other day I acquired enough hours for my float plane conversion. I can now land on both land and water! Here's a picture of the ol' girl I trained on. |