Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): Our years of graft and gluttony and inability to address the symptoms of poverty have resulted in an entire generation of young people that couldn't even serve if we really needed them to. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 5 percent have a criminal record. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): The report, drawing on Pentagon data, |
Quoting Fr8mech (Reply 3): Question: Is this data of folks who have actually been turned away, or is the Pentagon extrapolating from the data in the general population? |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 9 percent ineligible for mental problems. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 6 percent have too many dependents. |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 2): Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. Change this requirement. The military will certianly straighten up these drug users for sure. |
Quoting Fr8mech (Reply 3): Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. I think some extra time in Boot Camp or Basic should take care of a few of these folks. |
Quoting Eaa3 (Reply 5): Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 6 percent have too many dependents. Does the military not accept people with to many kids? |
Quoting Windy95 (Reply 6): Do you guys really think that boot camp or the military way of life stops drug users.? |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 9): Well I guess we're screwed. |
Quoting Eaa3 (Reply 5): Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 6 percent have too many dependents. Does the military not accept people with to many kids? |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 7): Quoting Windy95 (Reply 6): Do you guys really think that boot camp or the military way of life stops drug users.? Not always. Keep in mind, the government still classifies marijuana as a drug even though it's effects is less harsh than alcohol with is legal. So technically, a 17 year old busted for possession of marijuana would be considered ineligible for 'illegal drug use'. Boot camp could certainly change that person's way of life. Crackheads on the other hand..... |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 11): I just wanted to chime in the biggest reason for Marijuana or any illicit drugs being illegal in the Military has to do with some occupational hazards one being a notable aircraft crash on the Navy but the history goes back to Vietnam. Heres a little history. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 35 percent ineligible for medical/physical problems. |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 2): The military will certianly straighten up these drug users for sure. |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 7): So technically, a 17 year old busted for possession of marijuana would be considered ineligible for 'illegal drug use'. |
Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 15): Quoting Superfly (Reply 7): So technically, a 17 year old busted for possession of marijuana would be considered ineligible for 'illegal drug use'. Not so. People who have "experimented" with marijuana are not only allowed to enlist, but become officers. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 35 percent ineligible for medical/physical problems. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 9 percent ineligible for mental problems. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 6 percent have too many dependents. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 5 percent have a criminal record. |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 16): I believe the AIr Force wouldn't allow people to enlist if they had tried marijuana back in the day. Not sure if thats still the case. |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 16): I know selling drugs or similar is an automatic disqualifier. |
Quoting AGM100 (Reply 19): Hell most of them can not even fold there freeking clothes and shine there shoes ! |
Quoting AGM100 (Reply 19): Hell most of them can not even fold there freeking clothes and shine there shoes ! |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): 35 percent ineligible for medical/physical problems. -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. -- 9 percent ineligible for mental problems. -- 6 percent have too many dependents. -- 5 percent have a criminal record. |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. |
Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 10): My feelings exactly. We maybe raising a next generation of misfits. Look around, that should tell us. Young America is my favorite expression when I look around, sad. |
Quoting BlackProjects (Reply 28): If it was a worse case Scenario how long would it take the US to go and fetch the Lifers and Gang members who have Killed and put them in Unfotm and March them off to war? |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 4): Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): -- 9 percent ineligible for mental problems. Keep in mind, many in this younger generation has been over-prescribed unnecessary behavioral drugs such as ritalin, prozac and similar drugs. Many are just normal kids that need more attention, discipline, better parenting, etc. Many could serve our country well. |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 16): I believe the AIr Force wouldn't allow people to enlist if they had tried marijuana back in the day. Not sure if thats still the case. I know selling drugs or similar is an automatic disqualifier |
Quoting Superfly (Reply 2): Combine this with the fact that India and China is producing more engineers and doctors than we are will have serious long-term consequences. |
Quoting L-188 (Reply 30): If we spanked our kids more they wouldn't need the meds. |
Quoting CasInterest (Reply 31): Most of these kids would straighten up under necessity. However necessity isn't something the Youth of the US have had to really deal with. |
Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 22): You can yell and scream that we are terrible |
Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter): 18 percent ineligible for illegal drug use. |
Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 10): My feelings exactly. We maybe raising a next generation of misfits. Look around, that should tell us. Young America is my favorite expression when I look around, sad. |
Quoting StuckInCA (Reply 35): The older generations should take a hard look in the mirror rather than pointing fingers at "Young America." It didn't happen overnight. These problems have been decades in the making. In many ways, I feel like my parents' and, to a degree, grandparents' generations have bettered their lives at the expense of the future. Now they (many) sit around collecting SS, and fat pensions pointing fingers at "Young America." Young America is struggling to fund your pension and your Social Security. Young America is YOUR creation! |
Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 32): Quoting L-188 (Reply 30): If we spanked our kids more they wouldn't need the meds. So does this mean we can get a bipartisan effort to cripple pharmaceutical production and advertising for antidepressants?? |
Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 37): Trust me, my two were raised like I was. They had more by far, but today they are middle aged Americans that I have no problem with. Hard working and moral. I am now working on my Grandchildren to be the same. |
Quoting L-188 (Reply 38): It would be nice if the liberals stepped on board, but they consider spanking child abuse, so they would rather start them out on the anti-depressents and them move them over to Mary-Jane and Heroin. |
Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 37): |
Quoting L-188 (Reply 38): Lets face it, having to fend for yourself does tend to give you a different world view. |
Quoting WarRI1 (Reply 40): You can say this for mandatory military service, it tought most a life long sense of Patriotism, a code of conduct and discipline. It did in my generation anyway. Something seems to be missing from many who do not go into the service. Discipline maybe? |
Quoting StuckInCA (Reply 39): Ugh. You had a great respectable union job. You like to rant about "them" and "the man" and "wall street." You allude to day when hard working men raised honest boys who, I presume, fished and hunted who grew up to be god fearin' christians who got union jobs at their daddy's factories... Nothing wrong with any of that. I wasn't even trying to talk directly to you with my post. My point is that you (and your generation) should consider how your choices and actions have affected the world and where we are today. Thinking how you did (almost) everything right and only got what you deserved while "Young America" is just a bunch of unintelligent, unmotivated, unskilled fools isn't helping anyone. I'm saying that America's older generations have more to do with your perceived opinion of "Young America" than "Young America" does. Feel free to disagree. Or to wait until your union sends you a handy postcard in the mail telling you how to feel. |
Quoting L-188 (Reply 41): I am not for the draft for couple of different reasons. But one has to wonder if it's abolishment in the mid-seventies had a lot to do with the degredation of American society since then. |
Quoting L-188 (Reply 41): it does teach dicipline and a sense of responsiblity, remember the stories of the judge saying, "The Army or Jail" to teenagers |
Quoting KiwiRob (Reply 20): If 75% are unable to serve now, just imagine what the next generation is going to be like |
Quoting StuckInCA (Reply 39): I know there are studies showing the opposite. It leads to violent children for one thing. |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 44): The desensitization of society away from moral or traditional values especially the 20th Century |
Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 44): The desensitization of society away from moral or traditional values throughout the years especially the 20th Century. |
Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 45): Quoting Mike89406 (Reply 44): The desensitization of society away from moral or traditional values especially the 20th Century If you think values ever existed anywhere other than in a few people's minds, you are sadly mistaken. History is wrought with people that may have preached one thing, but did just the opposite. The only difference today is that most people are no longer secretive about what they do |
Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 46): Traditional values don't mean moral by any stretch of the imagination. Traditional values were once that blacks are inferior to whites, that any non-Christian/non-Muslim/non-whatever deserves to die etc etc. You can't say that just because my generation holds different values than what was "traditional" means they are necessarily worse. I would argue that my generation is far more accepting of differences than yours (all you have to do is look at the age distribution of support for same-sex marriage to get a glimpse of that). In my mind, that is more moral than shunning those who are different. |
Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 46): Also, being gungho about joining the military and fighting a war isn't "Patriotic" or "moral." I consider it a lot more moral to be against going to war unless it is absolutely, positively, verifiably necessary. It saves millions of both civilian and military lives that way. |
Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 46): To those who say that my generation have been spoiled and handed everything they want on a silver platter, I will say yes some have that, but so did some in the 50s. Granted we are a generation that is a product of the Baby Boomers, who have matured and spawned in relatively opulent times (arguably, the entire post WWII half of the 20th century was relatively opulent) so we may have grown up with more access to resources than the older generation, but that does not mean we are handed our lives and success. My parents were able to provide me not only the bare essentials, but much more than that. They provided me with every tool I needed to succeed, but still, they could not hand me success; no parent can. I worked my ass off in school, stayed away from drugs and alcohol, gave back to the community, and tried to the best of my ability to be a good person, I say this not because I am the exception and I want to make myself look good, but rather because I am not the exception. I have met many people just like me, and their success inspires me to work even more. Finally, as to a lack of purpose, I would point to the 1960s and say "look at those teens, what are they doing with their life?" and yet they grew up to be fully functional members of society. Moreover, the multi-faceted problems of the modern world give us even more sense of purpose than perhaps the previous generation. When things are good, it is hard to see a goal, but when things are bad, the goal is clear. One of the things I like best about coming here to MIT is that I get to interact with people who have the greatest ambitions that I could imagine. People here look to cure cancer, help stop global warming, manufacture organisms for high-efficiency batteries, adapt wind turbines for greater efficiency. There are many faults with our generation, but they are not faults never before-seen. My generation will have its growing pains just like yours did, but just as yours did, it will grow up and strive to make the world a better place than it is currently. This is what I see everyday, this is what I believe, and this is all I can believe. If you cannot see this, or are unwilling to see this, I am truly sorry for you; that must be the saddest emotion possible |
Quoting Speedbird174 (Reply 48): IMHO some of the reasons for ineligibility are totally and utterly nonsense, as mentioned in previous posts by others, those with criminal records, drugs offenses and a few offspring here and there would do well in the military. Honestly, they would come out changed men and women after basic military training, different attitudes, skills, much fitter and healthier etc etc. It would do them GOOD. And the country too. Only those with serious medical/psychological/physical reasons should be officially excluded. |