Quoting Mir (Reply 268): Why do we need Olympic soccer, and why do we need Olympic tennis? |
I agree. Not only that, but for football there is a requirement for multiple large stadiums, which is fine in locations like Britain, but difficult and expensive for many regions, and could be a major deterrent for many bids.
Building one large stadium for opening/athletics, plus some smaller ones (basketball/handball, swimming, velodrome, hockey) is expensive enough, but add the expense of 3-4 football stadiums, very difficult.
There are some sports that also require dedicated stadiums, but for the most part, only one is needed with perhaps a smaller secondary one for qualifications (like a tennis stadium, plus a couple showcourts).
Therefore, I was initially against Rugby Sevens becoming an olympic sport, unless they keep football (as the same stadiums can be used). If football becomes dropped, then suddenly rugby becomes and expensive sport to have. As for golf, I'm a bit torn, most places have a golf course that can be used, but it might be a major deterrent for places without one, as it takes a huuuuuge amount of space. Also, golf is like tennis and football, already a widely televised sport that doesn't need the olympics.
I'm all for the other sports currently in the olympics, especially for the ones where the event that the athletes look forward to the most is the olympics, which is not the case for football (however, womens football deserves to be there, but will be an expensive thing to keep), tennis, golf. As for basketball, it is one of the bigger events for everyone but North America.
Anyway, I would also like to congratulate Eirik Veraas Larsen for Norway's first Gold medal! (About time)
-CXfirst