Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Max Q (Thread starter): |
Quoting comorin (Reply 2): The nice thing about square riggers is that they don't heel as much as other rigging. They must be designed, I think, for running ( wind behind) rather than sailng into the wind? |
Quoting Max Q (Thread starter): never had a chance to go on a squarerigger |
Quoting comorin (Reply 2): Thank you for the book recommendation, I will look for it |
Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 4): Problem solved. http://www.sorlandet.org/en |
Quoting PITingres (Reply 3): Yes, the square rig is designed for running. I believe that the square-rigger sailed best with the wind on the quarter. (i.e. at an angle from a straight following wind.) With a wind from dead astern, the fore sails are shadowed and can't contribute, which also leads to a tendency to bury the bow. You are correct that a square-rigger can't sail as close to the wind as a fore-and-aft rig. |
Quoting Scooter01 (Reply 6): To further contribute to this thread, I just want to mention that my great grandfather, Niels Eriksen, was a captain on this ship: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skomv%C3%A6r_(barque) Very much like the USCG "Eagle" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segelschulschiff_Horst_Wessel A barque is not a full-rigger as the aft mast has "fore and aft" sails. I read his diary many years ago, and what I found most facinating was how they managed to navigate up or down a S-shaped river by angling the sails to turn the ship or even make it move sideways. He also lost his wife early, so that made him a single father of a young teen-age daughter (my grandmother), and what better to do than bring her along on some of his voyages. I can still remember her telling some stories and she even contributed in a radio-program to raise money for a new rescue-vessel. |