For me personally:
Best Bond: Sir Sean Connery - best actor to play Bond; Timothy Dalton - most faithful portrayal of literary Bond.
Let me explain: I think Connery is the best actor to have played Bond. I don't think any of the other actors to have played Bond come close to Connery's acting talent, with the exception of Craig. Connery's performance in his first two films were nothing short of magnificent. He 'owned' the character. Connery is Bond.
But Dalton gave the more accurate to the novel portrayal. His was the Bond who was every bit the world-weary professional killer that hated his job and only killed when he had to, and who would drown his nightmares with a few too many stiff drinks. His was the Bond who was very much human rather than superhero, and who had seen death too many times to glamorise it. I think Dalton had the best portrayal of James Bond. He played Bond the way it was meant to be played.
The way I see it, Connery was the best actor to have played Bond; Dalton was the best Bond. But the former statement doesn't do any justice to Dalton's by the book portrayal; neither does the latter do any justice to Connery's superlative early performances which no one has so far got near (52 years later, I still think
From Russia With Love is the best Bond film ever made). If I had to rank the actors, Connery would be number 1 and Dalton a close second.
Best Bond Movies:
1.
From Russia With Love
2.
On Her Majesty's Secret Service
3.
Dr No
4.
Goldfinger
5.
Thunderball
Best Bond Song: Goldfinger by Dame Shirley Bassey
Worst Bond: Sir Roger Moore
Worst Bond Movie: Die Another Day
Worst Bond Song: Die Another Day
Quoting bmacleod (Reply 21): Roger Moore brought humor into Bond's character, and although I enjoyed it, many Bond fans were turned off by it. |
... myself included. I'm very much a 'Fleming purist' when it comes to Bond films. I believe Fleming's novels is the standard by which Bond films are to be judged, and the Fleming way is the only way to play Bond. In my view, every film should seek to interpret the literary Bond as faithfully as possible; the only difference being the time and place that the character's missions take place.
Moore was, in many ways, the polar opposite to Fleming's Bond. Where Fleming's Bond was cold and ruthless, Moore's Bond was a gentleman and a charmer. Where Fleming's Bond was a killer, Moore's Bond was a lover.
I don't think that would apply to Fleming's Bond. Bond's job isn't glamorous. His job is to be "as cool about death as a surgeon. If it happened, it happened. Regret was unprofessional." He smokes and drinks his humanity away, all the while living the high life due to his belief that he won't waste is days trying to prolong them, but rather living life to the full because as a 00, he has a low life expectancy and any day could be his last.
Don't know about you, but I certainly don't want to be him. I think the films has turned up the glamour of Bond's high life without adequately addressing the dangers of his job and its effect on Bond's psyche.
Quoting bmacleod (Reply 33): I've heard Dalton was seen as too stone-faced and serious to be an effective and appealing Bond...even Daniel Craig smiled more and was more "mellow" than Dalton. |
I think the fact that not many people have read the books is part of the reason why not many people warmed to his performances. I don't think it is a reflection of Dalton's performance at all.
Quoting zckls04 (Reply 35): Dalton IMO was the best Bond, because he actually knew how to act. The Living Daylights wasn't the best of stories admittedly, but was still the best Bond movie in a decade. Licence to Kill was superb.
Problem is he came right after the Roger Moore period, so all people wanted was silly one-liners and gadgets. Dalton's character was a lot closer to the books. |
This is where I disagree. If I have anything to say about this at all, there won't ever be a black Bond, because that's not the character that Fleming wrote.
Quoting zckls04 (Reply 35): I'd rather have the actor that's best for the series, whoever that may be. |
Not anybody can play James Bond. The actor must not only be able to act the part, he must also look the part. Fleming has given his description of James Bond's appearance in his novels - about six feet tall, slim build, black hair side-parted but falling down to a comma above his right eyebrow, blue-grey eyes, scar down his right cheek, has a 'cruel' look about his mouth. Sure, none of the actors to have portrayed Bond have looked exactly as described, but they mostly fit the bill on one way or another. Dalton, in my view, was the closest.
Quoting zckls04 (Reply 41): Is race really one of those basic elements though? I don't feel like Bond's whiteness is a particularly important part of what makes him Bond. |
Yes, it is. Bond is white, and although not expressly stated in Fleming's novels, his mannerisms clearly indicate that.
Whether fictional or not, Bond has an established background which includes him being white. One question I've always struggled with is why there is a push to make Bond black. Why Bond? Why not introduce a new character to the franchise who does the same job as Bond in the MI6 and is Bond's ally? Or even create a whole new franchise based on a main character whose job is an MI6 assassin?
Quoting kevin (Reply 49): Michael Fassbender would make a great Bond. |
I think Fassbender is a bit too old now. Assuming Craig comes back for one more in 2018, the next Bond won't make his debut until 2021. In that case, I'd like to see Henry Cavill or Nicholas Hoult as James Bond.
Actually, no. Connery wasn't Fleming's first choice. Fleming wanted David Niven or Cary Grant. I believe they were considered (and quite possibly offered) the role before Connery was. The producers were the ones that wanted Connery.
[Edited 2015-11-30 06:49:56]