Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
ContentCreator wrote:It was entertaining watching that old guy get shot in the face on television. Too bad that Chevy Tahoe ™ with Goodyear ™ Snowblaster Tires didn't stand up to the commercials thought.
As for white privileged... I don't think so. The case had been going on for so long (in Nevada) and the Obama administration was fearful of another Waco. I enjoy a bloody siege every once in a while though- ruined lives on one side and decades long government careers ended by violence on the other. Exciting! Keeps both sides in check.
ContentCreator wrote:white privileged... I don't think so.
ContentCreator wrote:The delusion in this thread is amazing. Nothing to do with better lawyers, nothing to do with the nuances of the case, its decade long history (with precedent), nothing to do with any of that. Everyone was in on it. Its all because they were white they were acquitted.
Did you see the video of those Black and Hispanic Clinton supporters beating that homeless woman, asking her where Trump was to save her while she was being assaulted on the ground and laughed at? Was that white privilege? Can you IMAGINE the outrage if white trump supporters were doing that to a black homeless lady? It would be ALL OVER the news and people here would be calling them racist pigs, etc. But nothing...nothing at all.
White privilege? Please.
Hillis wrote:Native Americans protesting on THEIR LAND to keep a pipeline that could ruin their sanctuary from being built are shot with rubber bullets, put in dog cages, and strip searched in the open. A bunch of crazed, white cowboys who weren't even from that area are acquitted after that standoff.
Yes, White Privilige beyond a dout.
CPH-R wrote:The prosecution botched their job, the defense got extremely lucky with that jury member that got thrown off (how on earth he got through jury selection is beyond me), and the remaining jurors were, not to put a finer point on it, morons who apparently didn't grasp the legal understanding of 'conspiracy'.
Flighty wrote:Urban chicago is one example. Where are government troops there? The Texas Mexico border is another.
coolian2 wrote:ContentCreator wrote:The delusion in this thread is amazing. Nothing to do with better lawyers, nothing to do with the nuances of the case, its decade long history (with precedent), nothing to do with any of that. Everyone was in on it. Its all because they were white they were acquitted.
Did you see the video of those Black and Hispanic Clinton supporters beating that homeless woman, asking her where Trump was to save her while she was being assaulted on the ground and laughed at? Was that white privilege? Can you IMAGINE the outrage if white trump supporters were doing that to a black homeless lady? It would be ALL OVER the news and people here would be calling them racist pigs, etc. But nothing...nothing at all.
White privilege? Please.
Post the video.
Hillis wrote:Native Americans protesting on THEIR LAND to keep a pipeline that could ruin their sanctuary from being built are shot with rubber bullets, put in dog cages, and strip searched in the open. A bunch of crazed, white cowboys who weren't even from that area are acquitted after that standoff.
aerorobnz wrote:They should have been shot dead on site so that they never went to trial.
VeeOne wrote:Post the video.
Just search it on YouTube. It's everywhere.
tommy1808 wrote:VeeOne wrote:Post the video.
Just search it on YouTube. It's everywhere.
as per Forum rules you are required to back your claims up,.....
best regards
Thomas
VeeOne wrote:tommy1808 wrote:VeeOne wrote:
Just search it on YouTube. It's everywhere.
as per Forum rules you are required to back your claims up,.....
best regards
Thomas
Go to YouTube and type in "Clinton supporters homeless woman" and click on the first video. How more clear can i be?
VeeOne wrote:tommy1808 wrote:VeeOne wrote:
Just search it on YouTube. It's everywhere.
as per Forum rules you are required to back your claims up,.....
best regards
Thomas
Go to YouTube and type in "Clinton supporters homeless woman" and click on the first video. How more clear can i be?
coolian2 wrote:VeeOne wrote:tommy1808 wrote:
as per Forum rules you are required to back your claims up,.....
best regards
Thomas
Go to YouTube and type in "Clinton supporters homeless woman" and click on the first video. How more clear can i be?
Post it yourself if you want to make these claims.
Also nice effort making an alternate account just to back Trump. Why not just be open about being an orangutan under your normal airliners.net alias? Too ashamed?
ContentCreator wrote:Did you see the video of those Black and Hispanic Clinton supporters beating that homeless woman, asking her where Trump was to save her while she was being assaulted on the ground and laughed at? Was that white privilege? Can you IMAGINE the outrage if white trump supporters were doing that to a black homeless lady? It would be ALL OVER the news and people here would be calling them racist pigs, etc. But nothing...nothing at all.
White privilege? Please.
flyingturtle wrote:
The natives and the blacks should found their own NRA, and try to get as much political clout as possible.
zckls04 wrote:ContentCreator wrote:Did you see the video of those Black and Hispanic Clinton supporters beating that homeless woman, asking her where Trump was to save her while she was being assaulted on the ground and laughed at? Was that white privilege? Can you IMAGINE the outrage if white trump supporters were doing that to a black homeless lady? It would be ALL OVER the news and people here would be calling them racist pigs, etc. But nothing...nothing at all.
White privilege? Please.
The homeless woman was black, IIRC, so not sure how much that tells us about white privilege, particularly given that many of the people haranguing her were black (or members of other minorities). Her signs were covered in things like "Fuck Mexico", so it's also questionable whether the crowd were really Clinton supporters (Clinton isn't mentioned in the video as far as I can tell) or just angry at her racist placards. She also wasn't beaten- it appears she was tripped up, not that that makes that or the subsequent appalling behavior of the crowd any less uncomfortable to watch.
(for those too idle to search, here's the clip in question- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lqoQ92gHsU )
VeeOne wrote:The whole point is that Trump doesn't have a lock on garbage supporters. And minorities can be racist and privileged too.
DocLightning wrote:CPH-R wrote:The prosecution botched their job, the defense got extremely lucky with that jury member that got thrown off (how on earth he got through jury selection is beyond me), and the remaining jurors were, not to put a finer point on it, morons who apparently didn't grasp the legal understanding of 'conspiracy'.
So evidently, there is a requirement for that charge that they had to plan to harm the people at the wildlife refuge. So basically the Prosecution chose the wrong charges.
Something in me wonders if it wasn't a sympathtic prosecutor who threw the case.
DLFREEBIRD wrote:[
then why did the FBI feel the need to shoot one of them dead?
LMP737 wrote:flyingturtle wrote:
The natives and the blacks should found their own NRA, and try to get as much political clout as possible.
That would be one way to get the GOP to support gun control.
DLFREEBIRD wrote:then why did the FBI feel the need to shoot one of them dead?
Hillis wrote:Maybe the Fed should have taken a page out of what we see from local law enforcement when it comes to far too many African-Americans, and just riddled them with holes?