That's a serious question.
I mean, they didn't vote for the candidate who said the most sensible things, not for the candidate who respected women or minorities ...
You open by saying you have a serious question, and then immediately in the next sentence expose your own prejudices.
First of all, you can never vote for someone who "said the most sensible things" when she has a 30 year history of being a pathological liar. Even when it was not necessary for her to lie, she would. So scratch that off the list right away.
Where do you see prejudices in my sentence ???
Clinton made quite a conventional campaign, nothing special, except that she fainted and Trump was very amused of that.
Trump made a very new campaign, never seen before, full of "unsensible things", and it's just the plain facts:
- “An ‘extremely credible source’ has called my office and told me that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud”
- “Robert Pattinson should not take back Kristen Stewart. She cheated on him like a dog & will do it again – just watch. He can do much better!”
- “Ariana Huffington is unattractive, both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man – he made a good decision.”
- “You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as you’ve got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.”
- and so on ...
Oh, about respecting women and minorities ?
- “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re not sending you, they’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bring crime. They’re rapists… And some, I assume, are good people.”
- “Our great African-American President hasn’t exactly had a positive impact on the thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore.”
- “I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”
And so on ...
Last edited by sebolino
on Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.