KarelXWB wrote:The separation is illegal and against the Spanish constitution. A lot of people will go to jail for this, including Puigdemont.
tommy1808 wrote:It is against the Spanish constitution and Spanish law. That does not automatically mean it is "illegal", it may very well be
but Catalan is certainly large enough to invoke self determination, and if they can make that stick, secession would be legal regardless of what Spanish law says.
Derico wrote:So Catalunya has neither a right to exist nor can it be denied existence. But one must seriously question their thought process, if they really believe a small republic on a Mediterranean corner will be prosperous by being outside almost all relevant international organizations and arrangements in this day and age. That is the reality of the world which might be highly uncomfortable for the independent lobby to admit and accept.
Derico wrote:All that said... this regionalism in the year 2020 is anachronism. I know many say that supranational bodies are asfixiating national self determination, but the reality is in-order to have a competitive economy, thriving culture, vigorous trade, you need many international friends, borders open to new products, ideas, and yes people, or you stagnate. This maxim has been constantly true since Rome, through Tang China, Japan, Argentina, now the USA and Britain, and others. When you close yourself you decline. If it was true in the era of the chariot it can only be more true in the era of 5G.
KarelXWB wrote:tommy1808 wrote:It is against the Spanish constitution and Spanish law. That does not automatically mean it is "illegal", it may very well be
As the referendum was illegal, I fully expect this separation to be illegal as well.
but Catalan is certainly large einough to invoke self determination, and if they can make that stick, secession would be legal regardless of what Spanish law says.
I doubt Catalonia will succeed.
Madrid can send the Guardia Civil to Catalonia and arrest the entire parlement.
tommy1808 wrote:Whoever uses force first, has lost.
Best regards
Thomas
dtw2hyd wrote:I know it would set a bad precedent, but wouldn't it be better for both if Spain let them go. They are at a point of no return. Imposing direct rule is going to prolong the issue and economies of both regions will suffer. A quick amicable divorce is always better than long bitter battle.
VSMUT wrote:There is a lot to indicate that only a minority of die-hard independence seekers bothered to turn up, and that minority now gets to decide the fate of the entire region. .
flyguy89 wrote:I think the Spanish government has handled the situation badly, but this independent bs is equally moronic. These pro-secessionists walk and talk as if they have some massive mandate from the people when all the polls and stats show Catalans at best evenly split on the notion.
tommy1808 wrote:but they probably have standing under international law, and that outranks Spanish law....
tommy1808 wrote:VSMUT wrote:There is a lot to indicate that only a minority of die-hard independence seekers bothered to turn up, and that minority now gets to decide the fate of the entire region. .
Like those hundreds of thousands people currently protesting the declaration of independence in the streets of Barcelona?
Oh wait... they don't exist....
Best regards
Thomas
Catalan premier Carles Puigdemont and all of his govt are removed from their roles. Spanish PM calls for regional elections on the 21st Dec
Spain public prosecutor announces will be filing charges of rebellion agnst Puigdemont - carries a sentence of up to 30 yrs [email protected]
Tugger wrote:tommy1808 wrote:but they probably have standing under international law, and that outranks Spanish law....
That is not true.... what international law are you speaking of?
There is no "international law" that outranks a sovereign nation's laws.
We may have bodies like the WTO and the UN but they do not outrank any of the nations they serve (or don't serve).
Tugg
Tugger wrote:tommy1808 wrote:but they probably have standing under international law, and that outranks Spanish law....
That is not true.... what international law are you speaking of?
There is no "international law" that outranks a sovereign nation's laws.
Article 25
[Primacy of international law]
The general rules of international law shall be an integral part of federal law. They shall take precedence over the laws and directly create rights and duties for the inhabitants of the federal territory.
KLDC10 wrote:The optics would be very bad for Spain if the government were to attempt to deploy the Guardia Civil or Army into Catalonia this evening. It seems like there are tens of thousands of Catalans on the streets of Barcelona. It could get very messy indeed.
DocLightning wrote:Spanish politics are a strange thing by the standards of most other Western democracies. The Francoist history makes strong nationalism very unpopular. Waving a Spanish flag around in Spain (other than at a FICA game or on a Spanish government building) is an invitation for a beating, or at least a berating. Many -if not most- Spaniards are primarily allegiant to their autonomous community (Cataluna, Extremadura, Andalucia, etc.). While conservatives in most Western democracies favor devolution of governmental power to more local authorities and the reverse for liberals, this alignment is reversed in Spain for this reason.
I agree with many others here that the idea of Catalan independence without the consent of Spain and the EU is a recipe for utter disaster. And yet, Mr. Rajoy went ahead and used force already to stop the referendum. What was he so afraid of? Even if the referendum had passed, the Spanish government could have said "Ha ha, that's cute" and otherwise ignored it, but instead he sent in the Guardia Civil. This is *HORRIBLE* optics for any Spaniard on either side of the debate.
For decades, Mr. Franco used the Guardia Civil as a tool of fear to cow a terrified populace. Since the return of democracy to Spain, the Spanish government has worked *very* hard to restore the public trust and faith in the Guardia Civil, and they did a very good job of it. And then Mr. Rajoy in one fell swoop badly damaged all that work. The image of Spanish citizens being beaten in the street by the Guardia Civil is a page right out of a very horrible history of Spanish fascism. Moreover, I think that these actions will leave a bad taste in the mouth of many Spaniards, even those who do not support Catalan independence. Come the next elections, I suspect Mr. Rajoy will find that his Partido Popular will suffer for these very poorly thought-out decisions, irrespective of the outcome of the Catalan Independence Movement.
tommy1808 wrote:It is against the Spanish constitution and Spanish law. That does not automatically mean it is "illegal", it may very well be, but Catalan is certainly large enough to invoke self determination, and if they can make that stick, secession would be legal regardless of what Spanish law says.
best regards
Thomas
787Driver wrote:Well I hope Spain will act swiftly. You can't just have territories breaking free left and right. Should Manhattan also be independent if they decided they wanted to? Where does it end? Also, it's the wrong direction to go in this day and age. It's better to be united than being a lot of small territories without any influence both financially and politically.
VSMUT wrote:The election was a mess, and can hardly be described as democratic.
BestWestern wrote:The Scottish independence vote is an example of a better run referendum. 12 months of proper debte, followed by a proper poll. No self declared vote, No ballot stuffing, no four week ‘Campaign’.
scbriml wrote:tommy1808 wrote:It is against the Spanish constitution and Spanish law. That does not automatically mean it is "illegal", it may very well be, but Catalan is certainly large enough to invoke self determination, and if they can make that stick, secession would be legal regardless of what Spanish law says.
best regards
Thomas
Well, provide a list of nations that will recognise an independent Catalan (Scotland, surprise, surprise) versus the nations that have said they will not recognise it (which includes most, if not all, EU nations).![]()
How far do you want to take this? I've just declared The People's Republic of Wokingstan. BTW, I'm the president, so you should bow before me.
VSMUT wrote:787Driver wrote:Well I hope Spain will act swiftly. You can't just have territories breaking free left and right. Should Manhattan also be independent if they decided they wanted to? Where does it end? Also, it's the wrong direction to go in this day and age. It's better to be united than being a lot of small territories without any influence both financially and politically.
Disagree. It is up to the population of a given place if they want to break away. It should just be done in an informed and properly democratic way, and as a last resort.
BestWestern wrote:As I said in the first thread, a coup d’etat has taken place, and the leaders need to be arrested, by force if necessary.
People, cannot, undemocratically, state their patch of land is independent of a nation.
The Scottish independence vote is an example of a better run referendum. 12 months of proper debte, followed by a proper poll. No self declared vote, No ballot stuffing, no four week ‘Campaign’.
seahawk wrote:Russia should recognize Catalunya.
787Driver wrote:VSMUT wrote:787Driver wrote:Well I hope Spain will act swiftly. You can't just have territories breaking free left and right. Should Manhattan also be independent if they decided they wanted to? Where does it end? Also, it's the wrong direction to go in this day and age. It's better to be united than being a lot of small territories without any influence both financially and politically.
Disagree. It is up to the population of a given place if they want to break away. It should just be done in an informed and properly democratic way, and as a last resort.
Disagree. You are actually being undemocratic and maybe you don't even realize it. Let's make an election in all of Spain and ask people if catalonia should be independent. See that would be a democratic election. You have a small minority of people in Spain who wants an independent little state that would never be allowed to join the EU, UN, etc. Independence will not help them. And do you then think that even parts of cities should be allowed to declare themselves as an independent state?
BTW many large companies are already leaving Barcelona.
787Driver wrote:You have a small minority of people in Spain who wants an independent little state that would never be allowed to join the EU, UN, etc. Independence will not help them.
BestWestern wrote:What has happened in Catalonia is no more than an attempted coup, with the support of Russia.
“Catalan" was the highest-trending hashtag among Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence operations....
VSMUT wrote:
First, no, the rest of a country shouldn't decide if Barcelona or Manhattan should be part of a country. Only the population of Barcelona or Manhattan should decide that. It isn't too hard to imagine that the majority of a country decide to sit on the lazy behind and freeload on a single hardworking and highly taxed economy, which is actually remarkably similar to the situation in Spain and Italy over the past weeks. It is the responsibility of the rest of the country to make sure that Catalonia actually wants to remain part of the country, and that shouldn't be done using BS referendums decided by the lazy majority. In other words, Catalonia, Manhattan and Northern Italy should feel that they get a fair deal as well, and if not, they should be in their full right to just leave. Do you really think that the population of Serbia should have been allowed to vote on Kosovan independence? How on earth do you think that would have worked out?
Second, if proper non-biased information campaigns are run prior to the election, then most places wouldn't want to declare independence in the first place. Unfortunately we have seen the exact opposite with the Brexit mess and now in Catalonia.
Finally, if we actually started doing the sensible thing and began splitting up countries according to ethnicity rather than ill-prepared Colonial plans, then we could probably eradicate a majority of conflicts in the world.787Driver wrote:You have a small minority of people in Spain who wants an independent little state that would never be allowed to join the EU, UN, etc. Independence will not help them.
The EU doesn't want Spain to split up, but don't think for one moment that they wouldn't invite Catalonia in for discussions about membership as soon as it happened. Catalonia is too big, centrally located and economically important to ignore them. Barcelona is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the EU according to Eurostat. Even without the big banks and corporations, thats a tremendous economy in itself. Now if we were talking Asturias or Navarre, then yes, the EU would probably ignore them.
VSMUT wrote:The EU doesn't want Spain to split up, but don't think for one moment that they wouldn't invite Catalonia in for discussions about membership as soon as it happened. Catalonia is too big, centrally located and economically important to ignore them. Barcelona is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the EU according to Eurostat. Even without the big banks and corporations, thats a tremendous economy in itself. Now if we were talking Asturias or Navarre, then yes, the EU would probably ignore them.
VSMUT wrote:
First, no, the rest of a country shouldn't decide if Barcelona or Manhattan should be part of a country. Only the population of Barcelona or Manhattan should decide that. It isn't too hard to imagine that the majority of a country decide to sit on the lazy behind and freeload on a single hardworking and highly taxed economy, which is actually remarkably similar to the situation in Spain and Italy over the past weeks. It is the responsibility of the rest of the country to make sure that Catalonia actually wants to remain part of the country, and that shouldn't be done using BS referendums decided by the lazy majority. In other words, Catalonia, Manhattan and Northern Italy should feel that they get a fair deal as well, and if not, they should be in their full right to just leave. Do you really think that the population of Serbia should have been allowed to vote on Kosovan independence? How on earth do you think that would have worked out?
Second, if proper non-biased information campaigns are run prior to the election, then most places wouldn't want to declare independence in the first place. Unfortunately we have seen the exact opposite with the Brexit mess and now in Catalonia.
Finally, if we actually started doing the sensible thing and began splitting up countries according to ethnicity rather than ill-prepared Colonial plans, then we could probably eradicate a majority of conflicts in the world.
The EU doesn't want Spain to split up, but don't think for one moment that they wouldn't invite Catalonia in for discussions about membership as soon as it happened. Catalonia is too big, centrally located and economically important to ignore them. Barcelona is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the EU according to Eurostat. Even without the big banks and corporations, thats a tremendous economy in itself. Now if we were talking Asturias or Navarre, then yes, the EU would probably ignore them.
VSMUT wrote:Finally, if we actually started doing the sensible thing and began splitting up countries according to ethnicity rather than ill-prepared Colonial plans, then we could probably eradicate a majority of conflicts in the world.