salttee wrote:That's just a rhetorical trick you're using. There is no official definition or arbiter for this "technical definition" you guys are postulating. This "technical definition" is all your own invention, it doesn't exist as fact.
salttee wrote:Now you want to use legal definitions and it is obvious that you have zero legal training.
Words have meanings
I still don't get what you are mad about. I agreed with you in almost every regard and even "colloquially" in saying that they replicate automatic fire and should be banned or severely regulated. I disagreed with some particular wording (because it's wrong,) you get all mad and say there is no official definition, I quote the official (according to BATFE) definition, then you go on about me using official definitions (?) and that I can't use them since I have no official legal training (ok I guess no one but lawyers should talk about anything) and that no one solicited my opinion (I didn't see where anyone solicited your or anyone else's opinion, you do know what a forum is right?)
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree (or maybe you can just disagree to agree to disagree just to be petty) but now we are clogging this thread, we should probably stop quabbling or continue via PM (which I'm sure neither of us want/care to do) but I'll let you have the last reply if you want, fire away bro