SteelChair wrote:1836Sam wrote:SteelChair wrote:I think the Attorney General of the United States is waiting because he is attempting to decide if he is just going to release it, or if he is going to use it as evidence when he refers charges against those who conspired to steal Presidential election.
If I were him, I would hold it for several months, thereby helping the democrats continue to implode chasing a paper tiger
If only Jeff Sessions had never recused himself, this whole silly episode could have been avoided. As it is, the House and the 2020 election have been handed to the Republicans.
Hey there's a theory, and what a humdinger! You have added a "D" to my multiple choice question. Thanks SteelChair!
Anyone else want to choose "D"?
Do you believe that the Mueller Report, once released, will:
A) Completely vindicate the Prez of the "weird Russia stuff" that is in the public domain by explaining just what was going on (i.e., "complete and total exoneration," but this time for realsies, although it'd be weird that Barr excluded this . . . I'd say that'd be making a materially false statement!)
B) Reveal itself to be a hoax, i.e., "Dear Congress, SOHRRY!" (I guess that sorta goes with (A) . . . I know you have implied that before, MAGOG)
C) Will reveal not yet public information of other "weird Russia stuff" that doesn't meet the prosecutorial standard for conspiracy, but it doesn't matter because the standard in your opinion is it's only a problem if it's prosecuted (I've been calling this the "Jussie Standard")
D) Mueller wrote a report implicating his investigation as a complete hoax, the AG is sitting on it and will release at the most politically opportune moment
Wait, that's kind of (B)!
There was no obstruction. (Hurts doesnt it?l
Thr FISA warrant was based upon the (discredited) Steele dossier, which was a piece of opposition research funded by the Clinoin campaign. The Steele dossier was then promulgated as an actual intelligence product by Brennan and McCain.
SteelChair (SteeleChair . . . hahahahaha . . . a joke!), you sound like a smart guy. Really on top of things. Thanks for help stimulating a discussion!
But who said anything about obstruction?
And why would I or any American be hurt if our President was not a criminal? I mean, we might be a little hurt if he was "almost a criminal"--I'm sure you'd agree too.
But you may be right . . . this may be a grand conspiracy of the highest levels, involving Secretary Clinton and a bunch of Deep Staters. In fact I've heard this theory before, so you're not alone!
I guess where I'm puzzled is how does that explain everything done by the Prez in public . . . you know, what FreequentFlierFriend and I are calling the "weird Russia stuff"? Do you think the Deep Staters were practicing like Jedi mind control?
If so, I find that scary!