Barr has refused to appear to the House committee on Thursday using the excuse of a change in format by the Democrats in his questioning by them by a staff lawyer rather than 8+ House members doing so. Barr knows if that form of questioning was used he would be humiliated and destroyed. The House needs to Subpoena him, but I am afraid he would fight it with Trump as his side to the SCOTUS so delaying it and not have to respond to it.
She scared him for life, he’ll never want sit in front her ever again! That’s why he’s not in at the House Hearings today - the ATTORNEY General is scared to death to face ‘any’ attorney as that ass-whipping he took. He won’t be returning anytime soon.
You know who did have the courage to get questioned by a lawyer infront of congress? Christine Blasey Ford. Barr is a chicken - needs to grow some balls.
Barr is a lying coward just like Trump.
Interesting. The Repubs kept saying how furious they were that Cohen lied to Congress. I wonder if they will also be angry about Barr doing the same.
I wont get into Barr, but for some reason Nadler added a rule that allowed for Judiciary Committee staff lawyers to ask an additional hour of questions on top of what the members are already allotted? Is this really necessary? By its very nature, most of the house members who sit on the Judiciary Committee are themselves lawyers and they should be more than capable of asking Barr the tough questions.
So why the the GOP need a lawyer to interrogate Christine Blasey Ford? They were perfectly capable of questioning her themselves?
Ok, Since you seem to be claiming that you know something I don't, I'm ready to listen. Please provide me with some page and paragraph numbers
What is is with Republicans and an aversion to reading? Would you rather that the Muller report was just a series of photos/diagrams and had lots of mentions of you?
This is why you come off as a joke..instead of acknowledging a simple FACT, you'd rather dismiss it and render it meaningless, a critical failure of you to acknowledge 'illegality' even for the smallest of crimes.
Yes, they're a troll account. Just like the guy here who keeps claiming that he's a liberal.
Like many independents, I called for AG Holder’s ouster for his refusal to prosecute Wall Street buddies.
Yeah that was a massive failure on the part of the Holder and the Obama administration. Why would anyone give the Banks an Olive Branch and then expect them to give something back in return?
Because another AG sucked does not make the current AG suck any less - since all he’s good for is sucking up to the WH instead of serving us impartially.
To be fair, it was a pretty successful with hunt, 34 indictments is certainly better than let's say, the multiple Benghazi probes.
Indeed and millions of dollar's returned to public coffers thanks to Manafort's forfeitures. The Starr investigation/report was much, much wider in scope than the Mueller investigation, but I don't remember that raking in cash.
Barr already had his playbook mapped out, minimize, deflect and outright lie about the contents of the report and pray the general publ;ic would look and say "oh this investigation that's been going on for 2 years, shows up on the news every night has returned with it's finding and it was all about nothing, have a good night, move on"....I mean seriously, that may have worked in the 60's and 70's, but there is no way it's going to work now.
Well, it has worked exactly as planned on the MAGA folks. Obviously none of them were ever going to actually read the report, so Barr's bullshit summary was a very effective means to control the narrative.