The original summary statement?
The summary clarification statement?
The rehashed statement the morning of the redacted Mueller Report?
All that running back and forth of 'I meant this, No, I meant that ..ummm I meant this.
And the lying before Congress when asked if Mueller was in agreement...he answered he did not know WHILE has fat ass was sitting on a letter from Mueller written a month earlier stating they were not in agreement.
Those actions point to a very confused LIAR at best to a shady, no integrity bullshit lawyer willing to masked the truth and skirt the law as he sees fit at worst...and that's how appears to most Americans today.
Mueller's letter did not say that Mueller disagreed with AG Bar's summery of findings which AG Bar confirmed in a telephone conversation. Mueller's concern was that AG Bars summery of findings could have been larger in scope. When Mueller's report was released, ALL of Mueller's concerns were addressed. By any stretch of the imagination, AG Bar did not lie about anything.
I watched the entire five hours of AG Bar's testimony and was appalled that after the hearing, the bold faced lie after lie after lie that Negative Nancy spewed for what was it 15 minutes? No. AG Bar did not lie about Mueller's letter or anything else in that 5 hour Democratic kangaroo court. Both Negative Nancy Pelosi and Jerry Nadler both need to be recognized for their slimy despicable misconduct in executing their public office and forced to resign or forcibly removed from public office.
It sure is underhanded that MSNBC/CNN didn't feel the need to report actual and verifiable facts in regards to this and decided that a false narrative and bold faced lies are in the best interest of their viewers.
Mueller's letter and phone call said that Barr mislead the American people. Mueller raised the question about why his report and Barr's report were so far off.
And you still have not answered my question.
What question is that? Try reading my last post. The truth is in there.
Scroll down to paragraph four and please explain how some of the ridiculous claims posted in this thread about lying and withholding evidence by AG Bar are valid. Mueller's letter did not pertain to anything in AG Bars summery of findings as being contested by Mueller and Mueller's concerns in his letter were completely addressed when the full redacted report was released.
It sure looks like Nadler will have to be led away in handcuffs to stop this horrific miscarriage of justice. In his 19 terms in office I wonder what other under handed things he has done for what he assumes "The American People"
should want.Mueller's leaked letter to AG Bar that was NOT released to the public.
Washington, D. C. 20530
. l5 .
March27, 2019 R5 (1/134 :5 13.17
6' 2, .
The Honorable William P. Barr
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice
Re: Report of the Special Counsel on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the
2016 Presidential Election and Obstruction of Justice (March 2019)
Dear Attorney General Barr:
1 previously sent you a letter dated March 25, 2019, that enclosed the introduction and
executive summary for each volume of the Special Counsel?s report marked with redactions to
remove any information that potentially could be protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure
that concerned declination decisions; or that related to a charged case. We also had marked
an additional two sentences for review and have now con?rmed that these sentences can be
Accordingly, the enclosed documents are in a form that can be released to the public
consistent with legal requirements and Department policies. I am requesting that you provide these
materials to Congress and authorize their public release at this time.
As we stated in our meeting of March 5 and reiterated to the Department early in the
afternoon of March 24, the introductions and executive summaries of our two-volume report
accurately summarize this Of?ce?s work and conclusions. The summary letter the Department
sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture
the context, nature, and substance of this Of?ce?s work and conclusions. We communicated that
concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is new public confusion about
critical aSpects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose
for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public con?dence in the
outcome of the investigations. See Department of Justice, Press Release (May 17, 2017).While we understand that the Department is reviewing the full report to determine what is
appropriate for public release?a process that our Of?ce is working with you to complete?that
process need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the
misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about
the nature and outcome of our investigation. It would also accord with the standard for public
release of noti?cations to Congress cited in your letter. See 28 C.F.R. 609(c) (?the Attorney
General may determine that public release? of congressional noti?cations ?would be in the public
Robert s. M?eller, 111