Pathological lying, bigotry, hate, and misogyny worked great for your party and President, so why you mad brah?
He has NO idea...none of them do.
They just want 'it all' for themselves. All = Anything not nailed down, rights, privilege, laws, etc...'just us' mentality.
And democrats just want socialism to run amok. Only state owned businesses, state owned housing, the government controls everything. They want to ban firearms, open the borders completely, and rob everyone of any wealth they have while enacting 90% income taxes to redistribute income more equally.
See, I can generalize too. Now do I think that’s what the vast vast majority of Democrats want? Of course not. I’m not looking to take anyone’s rights away, anyone’s privilege, nor to add any laws. Again, this entire equation is a balance between self sufficiency and government dependency. I lean toward self sufficiency (which you consider selfish, so be it) you lean toward the government providing more, which creates dependency.
Exactly why you'd make a piss poor entrepreneur.
"I lean toward self sufficiency (which you consider selfish,"
A page from Ayn Rand's shit-sheet.
People who bought into that smorgasbord of BS are ...the most extreme 'greed is good' crowd.
They somehow actually believe that they find themselves in their current situation due the fact it was achieved solely on their own.
Chunkahontas actually thinks he was born and made himself wealthy. Pops had a minor role. Mom? Who?
Ayn Rand, anyone (not most people) with a modicum of inside Film Studio workings of the days of Louie B. Mayer (of MGM) days when they were virtually a nation unto themselves.
Rand, a haggardly looking battle-axe amid a business centered on the World's most beautiful women - period.
Movie pictures are NEW to the masses, they are captivated as imaginations run wild.
Rand, gotta give her credit, played the role of the poor person's Uncle Tom (if ur not up to speed on UT's...see SCOTUS Clarence Thomas + history)
Rand certified the pursuit of unabated greed at all/any cost and weaponized it for the CEOs of the day. The World's poor had no choice to submit the official conditional standard of existing in this life, the 'the poor get poorer, rich get richer' mantra. And the race was on make that a permanent state of things.
What good is 'self sufficiency' as a slave, any place, any era?
You have three choices.
1) To work hard and conclude it's best for the group overall.
2) Self sufficiency - look out only for #1, screw everyone else, sell out and tell the boss everything that is happening (putting all others in danger, while elevating your value Ayn Rand/Clarence Thomas)
3) Resist and Die.
There are no other options.
And supplant 'slave' with term 'worker bee' and you have 90% of the world's population within that range.
You are the product you are born in....you had no decision in any of that. You had help, a lot of help, then..now and up to how ever far you go.
Your 'self sufficiency' attitude only works with wholesale disregard of others except when they are useful (see the US president---> Cohen+others) ....then dispose of them when finished- like when you partake with cheap hooker.
Yes, the Kum-baya approach is far superior and far more JUST.
It is Humane.
..and if the species is survive and prosper, it'll be done by team work, not 'survival of the most ruthless' aka greediest/last man standing.
"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson