So you want civil unrest in EU and more crimes. It's clear that you don't know law and why it exists and how it works.
I gave example of Ukrainians in Poland. They come there to work, without any housing and the likes. And I civil unrests whatsoever. It’s more about expectations management.
Social assistance and free housing should be bare minimum.
Well - let’s say I am a middle class taxpayer constantly battling with ever increasing cost of living. And now someone who just came heck knows from where for a sake of welfare, at the expense of my own taxes, will compete with me for housing and jack its price up? Do you think I find it fair? I do not. And this has nothing to do with social justice, this is state-supported racketeering.
Why you want to not even try integration?
I never said I am not against. One doesn’t affect the other. There are millions of people in the West who work at day time and work on their education, take classes in the evening. That includes language classes.
Just turn the boats away from Europe tow them back to where they cam from. I’d also send in special forces to sink them in port before the migrants use them. Shooting the smugglers would also be a good start, they’re little more then pirates praying on human misery.
This is what you wrote:
Agree 100%. And - to begin with - stop attracting them. Modernize immigration system. Don’t hesitate to kick out those who break the law. No welfare, no social assistance, no free housing. You came to a safe place - look for work, support yourself, pay taxes.
First part I agree, but your post was not about Ukrainians in Poland. If you don't have money then you steal. No welfare, no social assistance means more crimes. Also, as a middle class taxpayer your housing cost wont go up.
If you read my earlier posts it clear that I am against welfare immigration (or whatever it is called). I am also against refugees from countries that have a track record of not integrating. In Finland for example Vietnamese integrated well, Somalis, Iraqis and Syrians not so well.
Refugees "invasions" happens inbetween. Often it happens in connections with major conflicts.
In sweden we have during the last 100 years experienced these in 1940s with refugees from Finland, Norway, Denmark, Baltics, Jews from concentration camps, 1950s Hungary, 1960s Praha, 1970 Chile and south america, 1980s Iran, Poland, 1990s Ex yugoslavia, 2000 Somalia Afganistan, 2010s Syria.
Economical refugees: 1940s -> 1970s Finland, 1960-1970 Italian, Greece, 1980s Latin american etc, 1990-2020 Poland and Baltic states..
Swedish people was themself between 1860 and 1930s economocical refugees to special USA.
In 1944 Sweden recieved 140 000 refugees from Finland. Sweden had in that period a population of 4 million people.
Many in Sweden was very sceptical and still is.
But Sweden has gained dramatically of these people. In relations, exports by creating new industries. Partly by not being depending like finland on only a few big industries we got less effected by the last crisi in 2008 for example.
Today many countries that are most against to recieve refugees in Europe are often the ones that until recient been sending their own population abroad as refugees or economical refugees.
We easy forgets that major parts of Europe has been refugees or economical refugees during the last 100 years. Now after a long period of peace shall we then close the door for the countries that often opened the door when we needed help?