And if it comes to the very low amount of men made CO2
That low amount of CO2 is 100% of the CO2 emitted beyond the equilibrium state, which makes all natural sources irrelevant when it comes to climate change.
Your "arguments" is one of the most obviously wrong.
To make a arbitrarily differenz between naturally released long time stored carbon like from vulcanos and from men relased carbon is simply populism to let the numbers fit in.
No, it is a fact that the sum total of increase since pre-industrial age can be tracked nicely with the carbon emissions we made by burning fossil fuel and methane release from our life stock, that we can migrate to CO2eq neural by adopting the right grazing techniques as well...
There is no „good“ and no „bad“ carbon.
Good and Evil are subjective terms and even climate change, science and reality deniers will find CO2 sufficiently evil at a few vol.%.
It is also quite bad carbon if my tax money goes to climate change migration, a totally preventable expenditure, instead of something useful.
It got released in an amount and has driven changes in magnitudes where it simply makes no more differenz if you stop the men made transport related relased long termin stored carbon now.
The breath of the people worldwide, the relase from the agriculture, the natural relase via photosythesia ....
I guess you don´t really get what equilibrium means.....
they are sufficient to drive a clima change.
Oh.. that is why, when all of that was already present for 1000s of years climate was stable and only changed over geological time scales, while it picked up by a factor of 1000 or so once we added gigatonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere.
I guess Cyano bacteria also never bothered to think about climate change from their Oxygen release...... no one would expect them with an IQ of zero due to not having brains..... until the "There is no good or bad oxygen" fraction realized they had just wiped out almost all live on the planet.
No sense to stop all traffic and shut down the industrie ....
A flight can be carbon neutral for about 10% of the ticket price, less on long haul, and i work in the manufacturing IT industry and we will be carbon neutral by 2021 for less than 1% cost increase..... why do we do that? Because it is the right thing to do and some of our bigger customers require us to do, although not necessarily that early.
No need to shut down anything. Unless of course you don´t adress the issue, then your employer will shut down at some point. Over lack of customers. If for example Siemens is one of your customers, you are either carbon neutral by 2030 or they won´t be anymore. Good. Time to cull the cancer from our economy.